Follow this blog:
RSS

Downtown Austin’s vision for a sustainable future

By | August 26, 2011, 4:20 AM PDT

Austin, Texas is considering a new master plan that would help the city take a big step toward improving its downtown and making it a sustainable city.

With a stated goal of becoming one of the most sustainable cities in the nation by the city’s bicentennial in 2039, what are the steps the city is taking to become a top-tier sustainable city? Here’s Austin’s blueprint for the next 10 year to help reach their goal:

1. Initiate a new generation of downtown signature parks. Complete Waller Creek as a linear park between Lady Bird Lake and UT, along with Palm and Waterloo parks to provide a green “necklace” that can support the revitalization of Downtown’s east side.

2. Complete the first phase of urban rail. Connect Downtown, the Capitol Complex, UT and the East Riverside Corridor. Enhance Congress Avenue -“the Main Street of Texas” - and other urban rail streets to promote transit as a high quality mode of choice.

3. Re-imagine East Sixth Street as a destination for everyone. Improve the pedestrian environment, diversify activities, protect the unique historic character and provide for coordinated management, so that “Old Pecan Street” can live up to its full potential as one of the most unique streets in Texas.

4. Provide permanent supportive housing. Construct and manage safe, secure and affordable long- term housing and services for those who face the complex challenges of homelessness, substances abuse, mental illness or physical disability.

5. Invest in Downtown infrastructure. Make utility and drainage improvements that address existing deficiencies and that support positive development in a sustainable way. Establish flexible funds and the leadership that can respond to development opportunities dynamically.

6. Amend the Land Development Code. Revise regulations for the downtown area to promote a mix of uses, incentivize well-designed dense development, preserve unique districts and destinations and result in buildings that contribute to a vibrant public realm.

7. Establish a “Central City Economic Development Corporation”. City government cannot do all this alone. A special entity should be created to leverage actions by both public and private sectors to develop projects that benefit the community, such as affordable housing, parks, cultural facilities and public infrastructure.

While there are no specifics about where funding will come from to pay for the $350 million, decade-long project, public-private partnerships could help take the burden off the city’s budget. The city is also getting feedback from residents by letting them play Sim City, of sorts, with this handy tool that lets them choose what projects to prioritize with a $80 million budget.

Regardless of how it’s funded this is a worthy plan that really focuses on making great places in the city — parks, retail, mixed-use development — that will draw in people and money while providing more transportation alternatives to the car.

Photo: Definitive HDR/Flickr

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Tyler Falk

About Tyler Falk

Tyler Falk is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Tyler Falk

Tyler Falk

Contributing Editor, Cities

Tyler Falk is a Communications Fellow with Smart Growth America. Previously, he was an editorial assistant for Grist. He holds a degree from Goshen College. He is based in Washington, D.C.

Follow him on Twitter.

Tyler Falk

Tyler Falk

Tyler does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what he covers.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

5
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Master plans only work if..
People follow them.

Every city or town I have ever lived in ignores their zoning rules and grants waivers for nearly every project in the city even if they allow schools next to factories and land fills next to hospitals.

The people giving the biggest political contributions always win.
Posted by Hates Idiots
26th Aug
0 Votes
+ -
landfills? hyperbole?
Please provide a list of at least one city or municipality which has constructed a landfill next to a hospital. Or a hospital next to a landfill. Your comments are not helpful.
Posted by johnhopkins1@...
26th Aug
0 Votes
+ -
Lawrence Massachusetts.
They put the Burke Memorial Hospital right next to the city landfill, which was right on the banks of the Merrimack River so it still leaks pollution into the river.

When they closed the landfill they built an incinerator adjacent to the landfill mound. They pumped black smoke in the heart of the city for decades, next to the hospital and they used the fly ash to cap the landfill.

The decaying landfill mound has a ball field and a dog park on it now.

When I 495 was built starting in 1958 they ran the Lawrence portion between the Burke Hospital and the landfill. The hospital was demolished in the early 1980s and replaced with a Grainger outlet store and a car dealership.

To this day Google still brings up results for the hospital that place it in the middle of a highway interchange where the Grainger outlet is located.

Google has a nice sat photo of the area. Adjacent to the landfill mound is the old correctional farm which is still used as kind of a prisioner halfway house.

A dump, a prison, and a hospital next to the old white gas plant, currently an LNG storage facility just up river. The city junk yard was next to the farm until a few years ago. It is now a Super Fund candidate across the street from a new school.

Lawrence General hospital is less than a half mile away up river.

It was a well planned city in the 1860s, but the implimentation left a lot to be desired.
Posted by Hates Idiots
Updated - 30th Aug
+1 Vote
+ -
I live in Austin
I lived here from 1957-1966, and from 1974 to the present. My wife has lived here since 1974.

The Austin master plan is a crock, and the city council is ridiculous.

Urban Rail.
We have a commuter rail now, that the council somehow persuaded people to vote for after it was rejected by the voters for years. It terminals at the Austin Convention Center. There is a large convention in town now, but the rail doesn't run on weekends. Parking meters now are mandatory on Saturdays, or there is the $7 parking garage. The current rail system is a total boondoggle. It would have cost less money to provide every rider a new Prius and a parking space. It's a nice, clean, comfortable train that doesn't go anywhere or at the right time. This, or course, was the idea. Now, the council can use that to push the idea of a "real" train system.

The only rail that would make sense is Riverside Dr to UT and/or Metric Blvd to UT, to service the tens of thousands of UT students who live there. Congress Ave (The Main Street of Texas? what a joke). Congress Ave, the widest street in Austin, is so congested now that adding rail would only make it worse.

East Sixth Street.
"Improve the pedestrian environment" What does that mean? Get rid of the thousands of drunk college kids or keep loud music off the street? They already close the street to vehicular traffic during all events and many weekend nights.
"diversify activities" - I guess that means fewer bars?
"protect the unique historic character" - Unique? Towns and cities all over Texas have old buildings

???Old Pecan Street??? can live up to its full potential as one of the most unique streets in Texas." - What a joke. A singer-songwriter friend of mine visited from San Diego. She toured Sixth Street after player her gig elsewhere. Her comment? "I've never seen so many people with so much alcohol in one place before." The average Austin resident doesn't go to Sixth Street except for special occasions, because it's a place for college kids to go get drunk.

They changed the name of First Street to Cesar Chavez Street; how long before they change the name of Sixth Street to Che Guevara Avenue?

Waller Creek Park
Sheesh. They paid homeless people to pick up trash in Waller Creek, and then suspended the trash from the convention center ceiling as "art". They want Waller Creek to be Austin's version of the San Antonio River Walk. Good luck on that one. I doubt that joggers would use it; I'm not sure who would.

The Austin City Council is great on spending Other People's Money, and then raising taxes and fees for the citizens to cover for their little pet projects.

The photo was taken from a great "make-out" spot... if you don't mind the three other couples that are also making out there at the same time.
Posted by bb_apptix
27th Aug
0 Votes
+ -
hnhub
We have a commuter rail now, that the council somehow persuaded people to vote for after it was rejected by the voters for years. It terminals at the Austin Convention Center. There is a large convention in town now, but the rail doesn't run on weekends. Parking meters now are mandatory on Saturdays, or there is the $7 parking garage. The current rail system is a total boondoggle. It would have cost less money to provide every rider a new Prius and a parking space. It's a nice, clean, comfortable train that doesn't go anywhere or at the right time. This, or course, was the idea. Now, the council can use that to push the idea of a "real" train system.

The only rail that would make sense is Riverside Dr to UT and/or Metric Blvd to UT, to service the tens of thousands of UT students who live there. Congress Ave (The Main Street of Texas? what a joke). Congress Ave, the widest street in Austin, is so congested now that adding rail would only make a / it worse.
Posted by s.zj
Updated - 30th Aug
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet Community and join the conversation! Signing-up is free and quick, Do it now, we want to hear your opinion.