Follow this blog:
RSS

‘Battery-powered building’ runs on equivalent of 1.1 million AA batteries

By | November 13, 2011, 4:00 PM PST

Winston Energy's high-capacity batteries roll off the assembly line

Winston Energy's high-capacity batteries roll off the assembly line

In order to power the first floor of the newly battery-ified University of California, Riverside’s Bourns College of Engineering, workers installed a 1.1 megawatt bank of high-end lithium-ion batteries. But what does that even mean? Well, given that a the median AA battery contains about 1 watt-hour of electricity, that’s the equivalent of 1.1 million AA batteries.*

Which, because I know you’re wondering, is almost enough AA batteries to cover the entire bottom of an 50 meter long, Olympic-size swimming pool.

The purpose of all this energy storage? Taking the building off grid by storing energy gathered by a roof-mounted bank of solar panels. Eventually, the school hopes to leverage this initial, $2.5 million donation of batteries from Winston Global Energy CEO Winston Chung to power the entire building.

If the future of cities is solar power, we’re going to be seeing a lot more of these kinds of energy storage projects. Right now they’re breathtakingly expensive, but the point of rolling them out is that there is just as much efficiency and cost reduction to be learned from actually building these things as there is from innovating new designs for the batteries themselves.

*I’m assuming that press releases claiming that the battery bank is “1.1 megawatts” mean “1.1. megawatt hours,” because a bank of batteries capable of delivering 1.1 megawatts of power even for a short amount of time is fairly improbable in this application.

Photo: Winston Energy

More on Smart Cities:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Christopher Mims

About Christopher Mims

Christopher Mims was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2011 to 2012.

Christopher Mims

Christopher Mims

Contributing Editor

Christopher Mims has written for Scientific American, WIRED, Popular Science, Fast Company, Good, Discover, Slate, Technology Review, Nature and the Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions at Duke University. Formerly, he was an editor at Scientific American, Grist and Seed. He is based in Washington, D.C.

Follow him on Twitter.

Christopher Mims

Christopher Mims

Christopher does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what he covers.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
5
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
POWER versus ENERGY - an easy trap to fall into...
You say "...a bank of batteries capable of delivering 1.1 megawatts of power even for a short amount of time is fairly improbable in this application"...

You were right to comment on the inappropriate units used in the press release but as it stands your explanatory comment is conceptually wrong - because a megawatt is a unit of POWER running continuously and has no time dimension at all.

And, conversely, a megawatt-hour is a unit of ENERGY that can be consumed over any time interval depending on the electrical demand. For example, it could be delivered as 1 megawatt of power for 1 hour, 2 megawatts of power for half an hour, 4 megawatts of power for a quarter of an hour, and so on. Or (much more likely in practice) 0.1 megawatts of power for 10 hours!
Posted by cosserat@...
14th Nov 2011
0 Votes
+ -
MW vs MWh
I "assume" the press was correct in printing "1.1MW" rather than "1.1MWh" for the power-generation "ability" of the battery bank (Watt is a simple multiplier of voltage and current during nominal power delivery for the battery bank). The actual energy (Wh) the battery bank can deliver will need to be calculated taking into account of individual battery's IV curve, battery bank design, system loss, duty cycle, etc.

The original author apparently knows too much about battery as "energy storage" device thus made a wrong assumption for MW-MWh conversion. To further illustrate: a 200W solar panel does not deliver 200Wh of electrical energy by default or by design.
Posted by cliftsay
14th Nov 2011
0 Votes
+ -
1.1MW versus than 1.1MWh
Who knows what the authors of the original press release meant?

If they really did mean to say that they had a battery system that could deliver 1.1MW of POWER but at the same time failed to state how long that power delivery could be sustained before the battery drained flat then they were clearly seeking to mislead the public. It could be flat in one second!

If on the other hand if they meant to say that they had a battery system that could deliver 1.1MWh of ENERGY then that would be a technically sufficient statement.

My main point is that Christopher Mims should have checked and corrected the ambiguous press information he had received. That's what journalists are for (or should be).
Posted by cosserat@...
Updated - 16th Nov 2011
0 Votes
+ -
Battery life???
My lithium batteries last about 3 years max. How's this concept going to pay for itself unless the batteries can last for say 25 years - like the solar panels? I hate articles like this that offer no clue as to the economic feasibility of the concept being discussed - or how close that economic may or may not be.

Unfortunately cliftsay - you are absolutely correct. Smart Planet articles like this are leading the race to the bottom regarding journalist content providers - as they parrot, summarize and reduce already biased press releases even further without the slightest bit of journalistic balance, or even mentioning the unanswered questions created by the press release. I've had a conversation with Andrew Nusca - (SP editor) about this very subject and there is clearly interest on bettering the content quality of SP, but unfortunately that interest is yet to materialize in the actual quality of their articles.
Posted by dduggerbiocepts
Updated - 2nd Dec 2011
0 Votes
+ -
battery storage
In England, if we generate electricity,through pv or wind,and do not use it immediately, it is fed into the grid. In fact we are being paid a premium rate for this. There is no need for storage, so no expensive short lived batteries are required.
Posted by kitemanmusic
2nd Dec 2011
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!