Follow this blog:
RSS

Will your industry be transformed by ‘open innovation’?

By | September 5, 2012, 1:41 PM PDT

Back in May, SmartPlanet contributor Joe McKendrick wrote about how some McKinsey data that examines how crowdsourcing is being used by certain companies to help inform decision-making.

Managers should also consider a related issue, open innovation, that will guide what percentage of their future business processes in the future will be considered proprietary and what is likely to become commonplace (aka much more cost-effective), according to some separate research from McKinsey.

The impetus for this intellectual exercise was sparked by some developments in the software industry: IBM and several other developers decided to place some of their patents in the public domain — inspired in part by the ecosystem of innovation surrounding the Linux computer operating system. The move led to more third-party innovation related to those technologies which, in turn, helped IBM increase its market share for some related products.

This begs the question: could the so-called open source model have a similar effect in other industries, allowing companies to use more commonplace technologies or practices throughout their operations for certain processes — enabling them to devote more investment or innovation resources to areas the might become market differentiators?

McKinsey suggests looking at three considerations to get to the answer:

  1. Are there specialty companies throughout your industry that offer proprietary approaches to handling certain functions?
  2. Are established companies looking to cut operational expenses by moving to common approaches?
  3. Are theses systems complex, which means certain pieces might accidentally infringe on other intellectual property?

If the answer to those questions is likely to be “yes,” your company might find itself at the mercy of an open innovation approach that could threaten its ability to compete.

McKinsey offers this chart as an illustration of how different industries might fare:

Things like consumer products or medical equipment, for example, are at higher risk of intellectual property clashes (just ask Apple and Samsung, which are duking it out in court over smartphone innovation). But you’ll notice that open innovation works across a broad range of industries, the McKinsey research shows.

The researchers write:

“For companies in both categories, relationships are crucial. Specialized innovators may find it desirable to work toward mutually beneficial royalty deals with suppliers and buyers that have adopted open solutions. Integrated players that want to pursue the IP-free option will need allies (which might even include established competitors) to share the cost of reshaping the ecosystem.”

Either way, managers are well-served to open their minds to open innovation options.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Heather Clancy

About Heather Clancy

Heather Clancy is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Heather Clancy

Heather Clancy

Contributing Editor

Heather Clancy has written for United Press International, ZDNet, Entrepreneur, Fortune Small Business, the International Herald Tribune and the New York Times. She holds a degree from McGill University. She is based in New Jersey.

Follow her on Twitter.

Heather Clancy

Heather Clancy

I am fascinated about how businesses of all sizes can transform their operations through technology -- not just to make themselves more efficient, but to rise above their competitors. That's the theme for my two ZDNet blogs, Small Business Matters and Next-Gen Partner. For SmartPlanet, I'm focused on profiling inspirational and controversial business leaders who have great leadership lessons to share. I also write regularly and passionately about corporate social responsibility and sustainability issues for GreenBiz.com.

Occasionally, I will pop up at an industry conference in some sort of speaking capacity. In cases where an engagement involves a sponsor that may be covered in this blog, that fact will be disclosed in coverage as appropriate.

My corporate writing work usually consists of crafting research white papers about some aspect of technology or moderating Webcasts. In the event that my commentary (in written, audio or video form) mentions a company for which I have provided consulting advice, I will disclose that fact. However, there is no connection between these projects and topics that I cover in my blogs.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
1
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
McKinsey Missing the Point - Innovation is PERVASIVE
I wrote the book, THE OPEN SOURCE EVERYTHING MANIFESTO: Transparency, Truth & Trust (released 5 June 2012). I like your article but you and McKinsey are both missing the point: open innovation is pervasive, proprietary does not scale, does not play well with others (across insular industry boundaries is vastly more important), and is unaffordable in the long run (all proprietary ignores "true cost" economics). When combined with industry allowable waste standards (see PwC The Price of Excess), bottom line is that McKinsey--and the industries they advise--are on death row. [all of my comment is open for reuse in any form]
Posted by Robert Davud STEELE Vivas
6th Sep
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!