Follow this blog:
RSS

Why humanity grads make the best technology leaders

By | May 22, 2012, 4:00 AM PDT

Yahoo CEO Scott Thompson recently got into some hot water over apparent misstatements in his official bio that added a bachelor’s degree in computer science to his accounting degree. It’s not clear if the erroneous credential was a mistake, but if it was intentional, Thompson may have been feeling the pressure to show technical acumen.

But is technical background really essential to lead or work in the tech industry? Tech entrepreneur and educator Vivek Wadhwa, for one, recently wrote that “Silicon Valley needs humanities students.” It’s time to take on the prevailing conventional wisdom that tech companies need to be run and staffed by tech grads, he advocates.

Could, say, a philosophy major help run a tech company? Wadhwa points to the example of Damon Horowitz, a philosopher and serial entrepreneur who co-founded Aardvark, which sold to Google for $50 million, and is presently the in-house philosopher and director of engineering at Google.

Wadhwa also references his 2008 survey of 652 CEOs and heads of product engineering at 502 technology companies. While they tended to be highly educated, only 37% held degrees in engineering or computer technology, and just two percent held them in mathematics. The rest have degrees in fields as diverse as business, accounting, finance, healthcare, arts, and the humanities. A college degree is good to have, but it really doesn’t matter what field it’s in, Wadhwa says:

“I believe humanity majors make the best project managers, the best product managers, and, ultimately, the most visionary technology leaders. The reason is simple. Technologists and engineers focus on features and too often get wrapped up in elements that may be cool for geeks but are useless for most people. In contrast, humanities majors can more easily focus on people and how they interact with technology.”

A history major, for example, “may more readily understand how ease of use and design can make the difference between an interesting historical footnote and a world-changing technology. A psychologist is more likely to know how to motivate people or to understand what users want.”

Aaron Shapiro, writing in Mashable, notes that the world is awash in tech opportunities, and provides some tips on how non-tech types can get a tech  job:

Learn how the Web works: “There’s no need to be an expert coder, unless you’re an aspiring engineer, but you should know enough about technology to make informed business decisions about it… The first thing anyone should do is learn HTML and maybe even some JavaScript. Codecademy and W3Schools are two great places to start. Or pick up a newbie book from Amazon.”

Start with a digital job in your current company: “Many non-tech companies are desperate for help building an effective presence on the web… This way, you can show up for your first interview at that desirable tech firm with a success story behind you.

Knock on the door of a disrupter: “One of the easiest ways to get into tech is to go after a job at a startup that’s looking to disrupt the industry in which you’ve spent your career.”

Position yourself as an innovator: “Working for a scrappy disruptor or the digital department of your current company will surely give you the chance to be a pioneer.

Accept that you’re not as “senior” as you think you are: “Individuals switching industries need to start with a more junior role… Invest time to learn the business and the pay cut won’t have to last long.”

Become a thought leader: “Build a profile for yourself as an expert by sharing your point of view on industry issues. Do it in-person, at industry events and meetups, and digitally through Facebook, Twitter and comments on relevant articles.”

Tech employers themselves are anxious to find and recruit professionals with business and people skills beyond tech skills. A survey of 376 IT employers I conducted and published last year, in cooperation with Northern Illinois University, sponsored by IBM, and as part of my work with Information Today Inc./Unisphere Research, found that about one-third of companies are seeking professionals and managers that can bridge the divides between IT departments and business leaders. Project management, analytics/business intelligence, and enterprise architecture skills are in demand by more than half of the companies surveyed.

(Photo: National Science Foundation.)

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Joe McKendrick

About Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick

Contributing Editor, Business

Joe McKendrick is an independent analyst who tracks the impact of information technology on management and markets. He is the author of the SOA Manifesto and has written for Forbes, ZDNet and Database Trends & Applications. He holds a degree from Temple University. He is based in Pennsylvania.

Follow him on Twitter.

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick is an independent consultant and editor. Joe has performed project work for the following companies in the IT marketspace: IBM, Systinet/HP, Teradata. He has performed project work for the following organizations in partnership with Unisphere Research (Unisphere Media): IBM, Oracle Corp., International Oracle Users Group, Oracle Applications Users Group, Professional Association for SQL Server, International DB2 Users Group, International Sybase Users Group.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
6
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+2 Votes
+ -
Humanity Grads
This is a nice theory - and it SOUNDS reasonable - but it's wrong! Having a humanities background is certainly a plus, and focusing on the 'intersection of technology street and liberal arts street' was arguably Steve Jobs greatest guiding vision that led to making Apple the most valuable company in the world. However, although there are a few examples to the contrary (or so I'm told!), successfully running a technology company requires tech-savvy leadership on a fairly technical level -- i.e., someone with a science background, minimum. The notion that any good manager can run any company breaks down when it comes to technology companies. (Case in point: John Scully + Apple) I've seen scores of companies fail by believing that it's all about -- and ONLY about -- management skills. If you don't have a tech background, engineers will quickly find all of the areas where you're in the dark technically, and use that knowledge to routinely manipulate and fool you -- no matter how good your humanities background might be! (If you're an engineer you'll know what I mean, and if you're not, you won't.)
Posted by MAM@...
22nd May
+1 Vote
+ -
Hmm
"It???s time to take on the prevailing conventional wisdom that tech companies need to be run and staffed by tech grads, he advicates."

advocates*

I think this is an interesting idea, and one that has been rigorously integrated into my graphic design program at OCADU (in Canada). But I agree with the above poster. There needs to be a certain skill set that is present before jumping into deeper knowledge of humanity. This is true in graphic design, and positively true in tech as well.
Posted by JL05XI
22nd May
0 Votes
+ -
Thanks...
Thanks for the typo catch -- fixed! And it's good to hear your program recognizes the value of diverse education.
Posted by Joe McKendrick
22nd May
+1 Vote
+ -
Recognition of the true value of individuals
Those without solid knowledge in the technical aspects of any project can be easily mislead by subordinates. I know of numerous cases in which some researchers show numerous publications of no real value in solving a problem while another provides the true solution in a single publication. In science it is quantity first, universities particularly, where it is publish or perish. Those with many papers with little value will be safe. A faculty member with a few of considerable value will be dumped. Too often decisions on rating performance and the publications seldom have the technical skills to judge the paper's worth. The argument that all these submitted papers are refereed and thus are good publications, refereed by others of the same ilk. Journals need papers to continue publication so they accept any passed by those referees. Finally, Chemical Abstracts abstract over 2 million publications every year but little changes in science occur even over a decade. There seems to be little contained in many millions of publications. Those without technical knowledge will only expand all this.
Posted by danarid@...
22nd May
+1 Vote
+ -
This reads just like . . .
This reads just like the MBA arguments that have ruined so much of the US business. "You can manage anything without understanding what it is."

It's totally CRAP!

You can't manage what you don't understand. Most Humanities majors are very well suited to jobs in Advertising or Sales, but they just don't understand tech.
Posted by YetAnotherBob
24th May
0 Votes
+ -
The best manager.
Is often someone without a degree.
Posted by Hates Idiots
25th May
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!