Follow this blog:
RSS

Why can’t a man be more like a woman?

By | December 22, 2009, 5:21 AM PST

“Why can’t a woman be more like a man?” If you are a Broadway musical buff like yours truly, you will recognize this as the classic lament of Professor Henry Higgins, as he puzzles over the bundle of brains and emotion that characterize the woman he discovers to be the love of his life, Eliza Doolittle.

I found the song repeating in my brain this morning (which is not a good thing as the lyrics are RATHER objectionable), as I skimmed a book review over on the Huffington Post with this RATHER intriguing title: “The Most Important Book Every Man Should Read.” Being extremely appreciative of great headlines, I wondered right away, “Why, as a woman, am I being excluded from that invitation?”

So, here’s the skinny: The author Steven Leveen is CEO and co-founder of Levenger, one of my all-time guilt pleasure stores. (I’m a pen and journal addict.) The subject of his blog is a book published this fall called “Half the Sky: Turning Oppression into Opportunity for Women Worldwide” by Nicholas Kristof and Sheryl WuDunn. This book, Leveen believes, has the potential to become the most influential book of the new decade.

I don’t have my hands on a copy (yet), but Leveen’s review makes it pretty clear that anyone with an interest in a smarter planet should read this book. Wait, scratch that, my copy has just finished downloading to my Kindle.

The focus of the book as you might expect is on human rights (notice I don’t say women’s rights) and the ongoing oppression and plight of women in certain developing nations. Mind you, this is something that I, as a woman, know woefully little about. Leveen’s takeaway from reading this book is that the “average white guy” is likewise sheltered and needs to understand more about the effect that education can have at improving the situation. Three examples why, which are played out in the book:

  1. Educated women delay child-bearing and have fewer of them
  2. Educated women will have more money-earning opportunities
  3. Educated girls help educate other children at higher rates than boys (this revelation I found especially fascinated)

Here’s one of Leveen’s main takeaways:

“The female half of our human capital is desperately needed to understand and effectively fight obstacles facing developing nations, no only overpopulation and poverty but even disease, terrorism and calamitous climate change. The way to hold up our whole sky is to free women to take part in the lifting.”

Heavy. Actually, not if men and women share the load.

As a woman, my agenda for writing this post is immediately self-interested and suspect. That’s why I loved Leveen’s own entry so much and wanted to point to it in order to underscore the message. The main point of his review is that men and women will succeed in the sustainability movement by working side by side and not at cross purposes.

So, all you males out there, spend five, heck 10 minutes, today trying to think from the women’s point of view. It won’t make you any less of a guy, but it might make you a more complete person.

And all you females, you should likewise remember that we’re in this together. While in many cases, male oppression and cultural tradition is the root cause of women’s poverty the solution will be all that much more powerful if it includes the yin and the yang.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Heather Clancy

About Heather Clancy

Heather Clancy is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Heather Clancy

Heather Clancy

Contributing Editor, Business

Heather Clancy has written for United Press International, ZDNet, Entrepreneur, Fortune Small Business, the International Herald Tribune and the New York Times. She holds a degree from McGill University. She is based in New Jersey.

Follow her on Twitter.

Heather Clancy

Heather Clancy
Writing publicly about what the high-tech industry is actually doing to help itself and the world get greener or more sustainable is one way I figure I can contribute more meaningfully to said effort. I'm also a big OMG-kind-of-fan of smart leadership, which is why the goodly folks who publish this blog let me go on about this topic and why I am always on the hunt for forward-looking business management ideas.

My daily writing is focused on looking for topics for my blogs, GreenTech Pastures and Business Brains. I also write often about emerging technology trends such as mobile computing, unified communications and cloud computing. Occasionally, I will pop up at an industry conference in some sort of speaking capacity. In cases where a speaking engagement involves a sponsor that may be covered in this blog, that fact will be disclosed in coverage as appropriate.

My corporate writing work usually consists of crafting research white papers about some aspect of technology. In the event that my commentary (in written, audio or video form) mentions a company for which I have provided consulting advice, I will disclose that fact. However, there is no connection between these projects and the topics that I'm covering in my blog.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

29
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Preaching to the Choir
I found your column very interesting. Three thoughts come to mind immediately:
1. As a conservative, white male in America, I am sometimes amazed at what is considered revelation or new ideals. We caucasian males (since the article makes a distinction, so will I) have known for some time that education is the best route to higher wages and a better life for our families. There are a million stories out there of people of all color and gender working their way through college (often taking more than 4 years) to give their children a better life than they had. This is a Conservative ideal. But is surprising that it does not get much "airplay" from the liberals in our country since they are "supposed" to be the compassionate ones (remember I am a conservative). The fact is that the best thing for men and women in this country, and of course the country as a whole, is a job and not a handout. Education means a (much) better job is possible.
2. Any man married for more than a couple of years should understand that it is absolutely necessary to be able to see things from their wife's point of view. How many breakups are a result of the husband NOT doing this?
3. The oppression of women in the world is not due to a generic "male oppression", which is normally used as a means of guilt induction. I am not responsible for the oppression of women in Africa or Asia. It is a direct result of facist and marxist dictators, who, by definition, gain their power by putting people down. Any idealogical "fight" that does not begin and end with addressing this will not have any meaningful impact on women in these countries.
I am interested to see if your take-away from the review matches your take away of the book.
Posted by Craigmeister68
22nd Dec 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why can't a man be more like a woman?
uuuummmm Mr Craigmeister68,
How do i say this without getting into a ... with you?
#1. What is a obvious to you may not be so obvious to others. How about this, "wow, i thought everyone knew that. i surprise myself over these things. thank you for the reminder that what is so obvious to me may not be so to others."
#2. Answer. Many, for which i can vouch having counseled about 1000 couples over the last 35 years. And it is a two-way street.
#3. I think, from my experience as a corporate psychologist, male oppression is rather generic -- meaning generally applicable,suitable for a broad range. I agree you are not responsible and yet i think the intonation of you note is rather "putting down" and rather antagonistic. And since you are addressing a woman your desired outcome may not happen. And of course we run into the problem of idealogic and fight which seem to go hand in hand.
Rather than dialogue with curiousity to understand, not agree with necessarily, the others' point of view.
Regards
dr. jim sellner, PhD., DipC.
Posted by drjimsellner
22nd Dec 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why can't a man be more like a woman?
The notion that women's oppression is due to the modern thought systems of marxism and fascism seems more than a little off base and unduly politicized - women's oppression has existed in many forms for many thousands of years prior to our neat categorization of political movements into these sorts of categories.

Also, the Conservative movement has plenty of its own means for oppressing woemn - namely very limited notions of family life and marriage relations that can keep women lacking in autonomy, isolated in the home, undereducated and overtasked with childrearing and household work,and subject to their husbands' control, even in developed countries with open societies.

The more important point made in the book and in this comment is that the education of women, and their access to free choice about how and where they live, how many children they bear, how those children are educated and so forth almost always moves the balance in a positive direction - even for issues like global warming and poverty, that seem only tangentially related to women's rights.

These are not conservative ideas - or liberal ideas. They are simply the reality of the situation as it has been reflected over many years, and studied in depth over the past few decades.

Finally, contrary to your limited ideas of what 'liberals' do ("encourage dependency") - I would venture that many, if not the majority, of the efforts to suport women and help lift them out of povertty through empowerment are carried out by people and organizations that you would reflexively condemn as "liberal" as though that is some sort of stigma.
Posted by MissLiz
22nd Dec 2009
0 Votes
+ -
Educate & Empower Women
This will never happen as long as there ia Islam in this world.
It's a Medievil,Opressive & Violent religion
Posted by effectsman
22nd Dec 2009
0 Votes
+ -
Re: Educate & Empower Women
Actually, Islam itself is not particularly violent. And if you'd like to call it medieval, then Judaism and Christianity are the epitome of B.C; they're much older than medieval times, I hope you know. And actually, just like with all religions, it is mostly the extremists who believe in opression and violence. Many Islamic girls are able (particularly in developed countries) to receive full educations and live as equals among their peers, both male and female.
And before you say it, no, I'm not Islamic; I simply believe that Islam does not directly correlate to oppression. In some cases, yes, certainly, but I distinctly remember the Bible says something about women beig submissive to men as well... so you can't say it's JUST Islam.
I'm not hatin on u, I'm just sayin.
Posted by myomi
19th May
0 Votes
+ -
Preaching to the choir, again...
You may think that this book is covering new ground, but clearly the economic ideas have been around for a long time. The developed and developing economies of the world for the most part encourage women to control reproduction and participate in the economic life of those countries. The parts of the world where this is not the case will continue to suffer from higher poverty rates and slower development.

When this book is published how many copies will be sold in Somalia, how about Pakistan. Maybe we should make the book into a pamphlet and airdrop it into the parts of the world where it is actually needed.

Of course someone will tell me I am out of line and there is much more to do here in the U.S. etc. There is a concept in economics called diminishing returns that posits that the marginal return of increased investment reduces with every additional unit of investment.
Posted by fgleeson667
22nd Dec 2009
0 Votes
+ -
A few points.
1) I am responsible for my actions, not the actions of others
that may share some feature with me in common, whether that be
gender, religion ,race or culture. I will not accept any guilt
by association nor will I accept that because someone else has
been unjustly treated that I must be unjustly treated to
achieve "balance".

2) How men and women interact vary according to their cultures.
The extremes being someplace like America vs most of the Arab
world. It always amazes me that people of one culture expect
people of another culture to act in the same fashion. While I
can certainly see how one may prefer one to the other, and
further there is potential benefits of one over the other, the
thought that people in power will easily let go of it is naive
at best. Being surprised that they do not "see the light" is
just plain stupid.

3) Comparisons of how much a person earns is only valid if you
compare job, education, and current relevant experience levels.
In other words, if compare things that are actually similar.
I have grown weary of the complaints that 4 years of education
in one field should be treated the same as 4 years in another.
Jobs get paid based upon supply and demand. If you are able to
demand a higher rate and you do not choose to pursue it, then
its YOUR responsibility. Choosing a field that is less lucrative
is a choice. You do something that is less rewarding in some
fashion in order to be better rewarded in another. Or you delay
gratification by investing in additional education in the hopes
that it may latter assist you toward your goals.

4) It is easier to hire someone who is not in a protected class
because in part its easier to fire them if they are not up to the
job. The level of documentation one must accumulate to fire
someone who is incompetent is raised when one must protect
oneself from nuisance lawsuits.
Posted by richard233
22nd Dec 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why can't a man be more like a woman?
CraigMeister, dictators may get their power from keeping people
under the yoke of oppression, but it wouldn't do them much good if
they were empowering their husbands. Whole tracts of people are
oppressed by any effective dictator. Rather, the oppression of women
comes from societies, communities - even (tragically) families.
I know that female oppression still happens in many places but I'm
sick of being told that "white men oppress women"; I'm a white man
and I've never oppressed anyone. Really. I'm not part of any
conspiracy, old-boys' network or ruling class. And I don't think any
of the many women I know (of my generation, at least - I'm 34) have
ever been oppressed, either.
So can we please quit insinuating that I'm some sort of tyrant just
because I'm one of the 50% of the world without a womb? It's not
nice.
Posted by steve_jonesuk@...
22nd Dec 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why can't a man be more like a woman?
Men and women will always be different... its just biology, were designed to have different strengths and weaknesses, that the other balances out.

But once you have accepted that the remaining arguments come down to social ideals of complete equality and the ability of women to have good jobs.

unfortunately you come back then to man is better in some jobs and women in others... but its the struggle to make women the same or in most cases better than men (just because women were oppressed in the past its now mens turn) in specific areas they are not best suited for that causes friction.

2 people cannot drive the same car, you need one to lead and one to follow.. in the same manner men will be better at cretain things and women will excell in others.

people need to stop trying to force a square peg into a round hole, it will reduce tension and allow for the equilization to continue.
Posted by aboocock@...
22nd Dec 2009
0 Votes
+ -
The brains of men and women are wired very differently
From conception until the onset of sexual distinctiveness, a developing baby's brain will have numerous interconnections between the left and right hemisphere. In the male baby, the onset of testosterone will cause most of those interconnections to dissappear, retards the growth of the part of the brain that processes smells while enhancing the growth that processes visual images. What do these differences generate?

1) Women can multi-task and switch tasks with ease; men have difficulty doing so, and it is almost impossible for men to multi-task. On the other hand, men can concentrate on a single objective much, much faster than women. This explains why men are crankier when interrupted; it is with difficulty that we shift gears. If we were engaged in an enjoyable activity, we don't want to be disturbed. "Why can't you wait until the commercial to interrupt me?" has become a de facto saying by most men watching sports on TV.

2) The part of the brain that processes smells is 3x as large in a woman as it is in a man. This is why fewer women die of food poisoning; they will smell something wrong and not eat bad food, but men can't and die more often as a result. On the other hand, the part of the brain that processes visual images is 3x as large in a man as it is in a woman. This is why men can park cars where women dare not tred (don't laugh, I have a video of a woman trying for over 4 minutes to back into a parking spot unsuccessfully; finally, a man volunteers to park her car and does so on the first try!) This also explains why many more men then women get addicted to pornography. Their brains are pre-wired to process the images faster and they get hooked.

3) Women must read, write, speak or hear 25,000 syllables a day to maintain their sanity. Men don't. This explains the popularity of soap operas among women or why they spend hours on the phone (in the Disney cartoon movie 'Peter Pan', as Wendy is sewing his shadow back to his feet, she begans to rattle on until Peter objects to the concatony with "Women talk too much!")

Another major difference is the distribution of intelligence among men and among women (the bell shaped curve that peaks at an IQ of 100 and falls off on either side). In men, the curve is flatter and more spread out than it is for women. This explains why many more men are winners of the infamous Darwin Awards (Google it if you don't know what it is) and also explains why there are more Albert Einsteins than Marie Curies in the field of science.

I expect to get beaten apart for these politically incorrect observations, but I refuse to apologize for telling the truth.
Posted by LarryPTL
22nd Dec 2009
0 Votes
+ -
your article missed the point entirely.
You bought the book didn't you? End of story.
Posted by Spiritusindomit@...
22nd Dec 2009
0 Votes
+ -
Battle of the sexes
It is amusing to read the comments, there seems to be more comments to justify the status quo as well as powerless to change it because of biology, marxism or it just the way it is. Men and women have different traits; but there is a large variation in how those traits manifest in individuals.

The undercurrent is not about the differences; it is about who is in charge, who gets to make the decisions and who gets to be dominate the other. I have not read the book but the quote indicates that it is about both sexes working together rather than against each other.
Posted by sboverie@...
22nd Dec 2009
0 Votes
+ -
Clarification
MissLiz, I wanted to give a little more of my opinion. After looking over your remarks and thinking more about the article itself, I thought it good to clarify. I suppose I was offended by the idea that "the average white guy" would not have a clue about the plight of women or about oppression. My points were a response to that whole idea. My claim of the importance of education being a Conservative ideal was misguided. I was attempting to contrast the stereotypical "Liberal/Marxist" agenda with the American "it is up to me" work ethic. I put "Liberal/Marxist" in quotes to reflect the policy differences, rather than the actual ideals. Also, I should also say there is a difference between the policy makers and talking heads that provide the "airplay" I mentioned and the folks that you rightly say are really trying to help people.
Conservatism has, at its root, freedom for all. The family unit itself is not oppressive. People are oppressive (That was my point about the dictators. There are specific people involved.) Having children and caring for them is the most natural thing a couple can do. The woman sacrifices the most in this arrangement due to biology not sociology. The nuts and bolts of how each family works is up to the family.

and Dr. Selnor, I concede that my tone was a bit grumpy. I did not think that Mr. Leveen's guess was based on any sort of reality. I think now that he probably does not travel in any "average white guy" circles. It also occurs to me that there are rooms full of marriage help books because most men do not, as part of their nature, see the world from the wife's point of view. That is a sad reality.
Posted by Craigmeister68
22nd Dec 2009
0 Votes
+ -
We'd never get anything done
A lady friend once told me how happy she was to work out of her home. That she didn't have to deal with all the scheming women where she worked. Earlier this year there was a NYTimes article on the very subject about how women spend so much time stabbing each other in the back. Tiger Woods affair was reported because of a cat fight. No thanks. I'd rather be a man. At least with a gun we see it coming.
Posted by ken.bld@...
22nd Dec 2009
0 Votes
+ -
What a sexist book.
If you are writing a book, an article, or anything that takes one
side over the other - then YOU are just alienating the opposite side
to your cause, not helping it. Do men oppress women? Yes they do.
But not all of them, and I hope, not even a majority of them. Do
women oppress men? Indubitably. What about the men who feel the
exact same helplessness, frustration and fear at the hands of women?
Why doesn't the book speak for them as well? Oh, but surely I must
be joking. I am not. We must embrace an "equality of difference" -
men & women are different and as such will NEVER be equals, except
in certain limited circumstances. Instead, let us treat each other
as unique individuals who sometimes share common traits. If our
shared common trait is a job, a level of education or other such
quantifiable aspect, then by all means, let us treat each and every
one of us as equals in that particular arena, but please do not
expect me to treat a woman or a man, as my equal when they are not,
either being inferior or superior to me. That would be like asking
a pro golfer to equate himself to a quadriplegic, just because they
both have a "handicap". Yes, a play on words, entirely unfunny, yet
true. That kind of thinking is what will lead to a generation of
bland and indifferent people who will never stand out, because to
stand out is to oppress someone else who isn't as fast, as bright,
as "same-gendered".
Posted by marioveguez
22nd Dec 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why can't a man be more like a woman?
One important thing to keep in mind is that women have the
role of insuring the survival and advancement of
society, and they can only do it by thinking like women -- not
men. While male testosterone pushes us males into action,
often that action is counterproductive to the best interests of
society as a whole. In the recent book by Dr. Pat Allen and Don
Schmincke, "The Truth About Men Will Set You Free...but
first it'll p*ss you off!" (available on Amazon.com), is
geared toward showing women how to intercommunicate with
men on authentic levels, but Dr. Allen makes an important
point in the last chapter that women -- and only
women -- can insure the future of society, by assuming their
inherent responsibility of keeping male energies in check.

If you need another example, consider the Euripides' play "The
Women of Troy" which is cautionary tale cloaked in comedy, in
which female prerogative is used to great advantage in ending a
senseless war. Remember, women can only be oppressed when
they allow themselves to be oppressed. They have an incredible
bargaining chip in the fact that we males are totally dependent
upon them for everything that is meaningful in life.
Posted by erapka@...
22nd Dec 2009
0 Votes
+ -
Dr. Laura has a view on this subject
From Dr. Laura's prospective - I feel that she could
sum up all the opinions above.

I wanted to find the few radio broadcasts that
she spoke on 'Why can't a man be more like a woman?' subject
matter - just could not find them.

Dr. Laura addresses this subject many times in her talk
show. Basically - listening to a series of maybe 7 programs
- you could get the jist of what she might say.
Posted by Donald.Nagy@...
22nd Dec 2009
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Why can't a man be more like a woman?
For heaven's sake, there's a vas deferens between men and women. I thought everybody knew that!
Posted by wsportydog
22nd Dec 2009
0 Votes
+ -
Vas Deferens
Well said, in 1958 I was in the RAF, and during a fun lights-out discussion about birth control the use of a rubber band around the testicles was mooted. I was able to slip in the same joke...."it would make a vas deferens"....after a protracted silence in the darkness a voice announced "you swine!"
Posted by Terotech
15th Nov
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why can't a man be more like a woman?
forget the petty gender war and realise facts, you are what you are
its what you are that makes the difference, if you are a maths marvel, you are, if you are a super carer person, you are, those are areas that typical are male/female but nothings 100% there are the odd female whos brilliant in maths and the odd guy who's a great carer
sure its true a smaller breasted woman is taken more serious in most cases than a large breasted, but that can be fixed and its far healthier to do so
people get on in the world due to 2 things, luck and having the right idea at right time, most successful are successful because they mega smart, its because they had 1 or both of the above and the drive to carry it
as for oppression, many know 3rd world countries oppress women, thats mostly religious stand point though as it was in white countries in the past but at the same time you should not call someone oppressed because they're doing what they want - its a choice for a educated woman to have excess amounts of babies, shes not oppressed just because she has a different view to a manager
theres always more at work with people than just gender
Posted by jubilee.xmen@...
23rd Dec 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why can't a man be more like a woman?
that should of said :
most are successful because they are't mega smart,


yes my brain is't wired perfectly :P
Posted by jubilee.xmen@...
23rd Dec 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why can't a man be more like a woman?
Because men in developing nations don't treat women equally, I'm supposed to think more like a woman? Why? what is that supposed to accomplish?

If you feel so strongly, I suggest you go to a developing nation and start educating them on the wonders that will result if they just start behaving differently. Oh, what a great world it will be!
Posted by jtdavies
23rd Dec 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why can't a man be more like a woman?
I have to wonder why it is that men are always expected to try to
understand women more. What's wrong with putting the shoe on the other
foot, and letting a woman see what life is like from a man's point-of-
view sometime?

It's not all baseball, beer and chicks for us either, you know.
Posted by David_A_Reed
23rd Dec 2009
0 Votes
+ -
Hey Heather...
Governor Terminator says California is full of girlymen. Why don't you move out there?

lol...
Posted by Wintel BSOD
23rd Dec 2009
0 Votes
+ -
Wow, these grapes are sour...
@LarryPTL: You are regurgitating a litany of stereotypes, half-truths, and long-since-debunked theories. Please stop.

The bulk of comments in this thread read like privilege throwing a tantrum. I guess some things are just a little too close for comfort huh?

Oh, and those who keep coming back to re-state their case time and again without adding any new info? I refer you to http://xkcd.com/386/
Posted by _crystalsinger_
23rd Dec 2009
0 Votes
+ -
To 'LarryPTL', RE: Why can't a man be more like a woman?
You posturing will fool nobody (well, except those who really want to be fooled).

And yes, it is posturing. You proudly proclaim you are ready to be beaten up for telling the truth, but it was NOT the truth you told.

It has already been well-established, for example, that all these people who claim to be multi-tasking well are just fooling themselves. NOBODY's brain is wired to do it well. Not men, not women.

We should not be surprised then, to find that there is a lot of the same self-deception in many of your other breezy claims as well.
Posted by mejohnsn
25th Dec 2009
0 Votes
+ -
Asking The Wrong Question
The big question around the world is not why men/women can't be more like women/men. Nor is it a matter of which planet they are from.

The big question is why women don't have equal access to opportunity as men. Yes, in emancipated parts of the world like North America and Europe, women have equal rights as men to education, medical care, property ownership, and legal representation. But even here in America, it is still a too-common practice for women to be paid 2/3rds the salary of a man with equal degree and years of experience in the same field - in spite of the recent Lilly Ledbetter law.

That is still not equality. That is exploitation.

Much of the world is not even as emancipated as Americans are. Clitoridectomy is still practiced in 28 African and 8 Middle Eastern countries. In even more countries. women have no basic rights of access to education, legal representation, and ownership of property. Women in these cultures are even denied rights to medical care without permission of a male head of the household. In these cultures, the husband of a family has the right to kill a child and his wife if the child disobeys the husband.

One company I worked for encountered these social attitudes when a client in a midde eastern country had a problem requiring a problem-solver on-site. So the company sent its best trouble-shooting engineer ... who just happened to be a woman.

The client organization was completely shocked and offended. The client culture was so patriarchical that the client building didn't even have a bathroom they would allow the engineer to use. She couldn't even get service in a restaurant without a man accompanying her. The situation was so intolerable that the company had to quickly bring the woman engineer back home.

These practices are not exploitation. These practices are real oppression, nothing less than slavery.

Too many men are simply uninformed about the true nature and extent of exploitation and oppression of women in the world. All of these practices are holdovers from ancient cultural norms where the only access a woman had to the basic necessities of survival and child-rearing were through a man - and the woman only had one thing to trade.

It's simply barbaric. Yet whether blatant and enslaving or subtle and hindering, these practices continue all around us. Every man should get an education and be an active voice for cultural change to stamp out cultural inequities wherever they are.

As a man myself, the differences in physiology and biology between men and women are only important in personal relationships. I enjoy working with women because they are great contributors to a team. I welcome relating with women as equals bound solely by our feelings for each other and nothing else.

The truth is that most men are just plain scared of intelligent, confident, and capable women.
Posted by cardhun@...
27th Dec 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why can't a man be more like a woman?
1. Educated women delay child-bearing and have fewer of them

... this is a problem in most of the west. We need workers to support our aging population. Even China is giving tax breaks to have more children. We need the education women to have more children that can handle complex jobs.
Posted by mashford@...
28th Dec 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why can't a man be more like a woman?
You might be a redneck if you can cut to the chase: Tyranny has benefits to the tyrant. Tyranny is achieved by the use of force. Force tends to be used by larger people to tyrannize smaller people. Men are larger than women.

This explains the fact that men with nasty personalities, the kind neither male or female like, tend to tyrannize women in order to keep that free labor and free booty coming in.

Most of the Third World, and much of the developing world, has a redneck culture and a redneck education., both of which see short-term benefits in bigotry.

This explains why the elimination of tyrannical government does not produce elimination of domestic tyranny or of sexism. Elimination of Islam, though, would go far toward eliminating all three of such tyrannies. Few know how many slaveholder families in the South were of Islamic descent.
Posted by littlepitcher
12th Jan 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet Community and join the conversation! Signing-up is free and quick, Do it now, we want to hear your opinion.