Follow this blog:
RSS

Want to attract and keep talent? Give employees purpose

By | May 23, 2012, 1:59 PM PDT

There have been plenty of research studies suggesting engaged employees who actually care about the company that employs them or, at the very least, about the sort of work they do are more likely to be productive. Fair enough.

Increasingly, however, professionals and job seekers are seeking purpose along with their paycheck.

Now, new research from non-profit organization Net Impact suggests a link between employee satisfaction and the focus that their employer puts on corporate or environmental responsibility. It turns out that professionals that are in a position that they feel will make a better world or contribute to society are much more satisfied than their counterparts — by a 2:1 ratio.

The authors of “Talent Report: What Workers Want in 2012″ note:

“We see these satisfaction levels reinforced when digging into ways people feel connected to impact through their jobs, too. For example, 45% of employees who say they worked directly on a product or service that makes a positive social impact report being very satisfied with their jobs, compared to 29% of those who don’t. The research finds similar numbers for people who provide input on sustainability or corporate responsibility issues at work or volunteer alongside their co-workers.”

The Net Impact research is based on a sample of 1,726 university students about to enter the workforce and employed college graduates from three different generations: Millennials, Generation X and Baby Boomers. The satisfaction numbers above obviously apply to those who are employed. Overall, approximately 55 percent of that group reported that they felt they were in a job role where they could make a social or environmental impact on the world.

If probably isn’t a surprise to you that the data shows students were more like to rank finding “an impact job” as either “very important” or “essential” to their happiness. Approximately 72 percent indicated that this was so, versus 53 percent of the currently employed survey respondents.

Moreover, 35 percent of the students said that they would take a 15 percent pay cut to work at a company committed to corporate social responsibility; 45 percent said they would be willing to do it for a job that makes a social or environmental impact.

Net Impact reports that attitudes about working for a company or business with a purpose are more similar than not across different generations. Between 61 percent and 70 percent of the respondents across all generations believed that they held personal responsibility for improving society.

Indeed, gender seemed to be the biggest differentiator: 60 percent of employed women said that working for a company that prioritizes social or environmental responsible is very important, compared with 38 percent of men. I have a sense that those numbers might reflect simple economic realities, and that it probably reflects the rise of two-income households.

There were some notable generational differences, however, surfaced in the Net Income survey:

  • Less than half of the students voted in the past year, versus 77 percent of the Boomers
  • More individuals from older generations said they had actually boycotted a product or service because of the values of the company that makes it
  • Boomers were more likely to donate or volunteer in their community

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Heather Clancy

About Heather Clancy

Heather Clancy is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Heather Clancy

Heather Clancy

Contributing Editor

Heather Clancy has written for United Press International, ZDNet, Entrepreneur, Fortune Small Business, the International Herald Tribune and the New York Times. She holds a degree from McGill University. She is based in New Jersey.

Follow her on Twitter.

Heather Clancy

Heather Clancy

I am fascinated about how businesses of all sizes can transform their operations through technology -- not just to make themselves more efficient, but to rise above their competitors. That's the theme for my two ZDNet blogs, Small Business Matters and Next-Gen Partner. For SmartPlanet, I'm focused on profiling inspirational and controversial business leaders who have great leadership lessons to share. I also write regularly and passionately about corporate social responsibility and sustainability issues for GreenBiz.com.

Occasionally, I will pop up at an industry conference in some sort of speaking capacity. In cases where an engagement involves a sponsor that may be covered in this blog, that fact will be disclosed in coverage as appropriate.

My corporate writing work usually consists of crafting research white papers about some aspect of technology or moderating Webcasts. In the event that my commentary (in written, audio or video form) mentions a company for which I have provided consulting advice, I will disclose that fact. However, there is no connection between these projects and topics that I cover in my blogs.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
5
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
Hmmm.
Where the results on, say, the, "Have you ever boycotted a product or service" weighted to account for the fact that Boomers have simply had a lot more time, and therefore opportunity, to have done that, and other things?
Posted by cadmium
24th May 2012
0 Votes
+ -
As far as I know, no
I had that thought, too, but voting with your pocketbook or wallet is not an insignificant thing
Posted by Heather Clancy
24th May 2012
+1 Vote
+ -
Bean counters are laughing all the way to the bank
"Moreover, 35 percent of the students said that they would take a 15 percent pay cut to work at a company committed to corporate social responsibility". Mugs.

CS and environmental responsibility can be pretty meaning less (BAe, GE etc I'm sure will say they are both). I'd say that it is properly social responsible to get as many people out of poverty as soon as possible - but that will conflict with environmental responsibility (or at least I'll be told it will) - so the 'environment' will win out every time. No wonder the developed world finds it difficult to find young people who want to contribute to actually making something.
Posted by preeves
25th May 2012
+2 Votes
+ -
Bean Counters
Most probably are laughing all the way to the bank. I must be a rare bread for a bean counter: I might pay more if that's what it took to get a responsible employee. All other things being equal, I think a socially and environmentally responsible employee has much more value to me.
Posted by ThinkMore
25th May 2012
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Beans and Social Responsibility
yeah, that's why GE just took their whole xray division out of Wisconsin and moved it to China....say...isn't the CEO of GE The President's "Job Czar" who is supposed to create jobs? I guess he did...in China...wonder how socially responsible he felt for the raft of people they turned loose in WI?
Posted by GregGold
25th May 2012
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!