Follow this blog:
RSS

Urban advocacy council advocates producer responsibility for waste management

By | November 20, 2009, 6:29 PM PST

Attention those of you who sell products that have a lot of extraneous packaging. Or products that are known to have an adverse effect on the environment. The U.S. National League of Cities has written and adopted a resolution that favors producer responsibility for handling disposal and overall lifecycle management.

This resolution got my attention because it comes just a few weeks after a coalition of states lined up to blast an electronics industry lawsuit against New York City that seeks to alter some of NYC’s recycling and technology takeback policies.

The basic premise behind the new resolution is that product manufacturers and the direct consumer, not taxpayers or local governments, should be responsible for dealing with the lifecycle impact of their product.

Here’s a statement from Heidi Sanborn, Product Policy Institute Outreach Director and Executive Director of the California Product Stewardship Council: “This resolution empowers local governments by speaking with one voice on the need for waste policy reform. It tells Congress to protect producer responsibility legislation at the state of local levels.”

It also puts manufacturers and product vendors on notice that state and local governments will play hardball on this subject.

You can find a copy of the resolution at this link.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Heather Clancy

About Heather Clancy

Heather Clancy is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Heather Clancy

Heather Clancy

Contributing Editor, Business

Heather Clancy has written for United Press International, ZDNet, Entrepreneur, Fortune Small Business, the International Herald Tribune and the New York Times. She holds a degree from McGill University. She is based in New Jersey.

Follow her on Twitter.

Heather Clancy

Heather Clancy
Writing publicly about what the high-tech industry is actually doing to help itself and the world get greener or more sustainable is one way I figure I can contribute more meaningfully to said effort. I'm also a big OMG-kind-of-fan of smart leadership, which is why the goodly folks who publish this blog let me go on about this topic and why I am always on the hunt for forward-looking business management ideas.

My daily writing is focused on looking for topics for my blogs, GreenTech Pastures and Business Brains. I also write often about emerging technology trends such as mobile computing, unified communications and cloud computing. Occasionally, I will pop up at an industry conference in some sort of speaking capacity. In cases where a speaking engagement involves a sponsor that may be covered in this blog, that fact will be disclosed in coverage as appropriate.

My corporate writing work usually consists of crafting research white papers about some aspect of technology. In the event that my commentary (in written, audio or video form) mentions a company for which I have provided consulting advice, I will disclose that fact. However, there is no connection between these projects and the topics that I'm covering in my blog.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
2
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
About Time Other's Espouse This ... But Expect Opposition & Loopholes
For years, I've been indicating this would reduce resource use, waste, and motivate a transition. However, there can be problems in the implementation.
Packaging is an industry that includes the producers, printers, and raw material suppliers. It also allows advertising. There will be opposition towards a transition because of possible job losses.
Also, less packaging costs should reduce cost for the customer right? Yet my concern is that manufacturers will maintain the revenue stream by increasing the product cost. As well, politicians will oblige the industry by tax-payer funded subsidies.
Just like the recent medical recommendations that indicated less preventative examinations until a certain age, I think the cost per procedure will rise inversely to the reduced frequency it occurs.
Loopholes will be found to maintain or increase the revenue stream unless oversight and criteria are imposed to thwart them.
Posted by donnydo77@...
23rd Nov 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Urban advocacy council advocates producer responsibility for waste mana
This is very, very important to follow through on because it would
help meet emission reductions immediately and much more related to
health.

I would think that any new product should incorporate how they
recycle their waste products before the products is allowed for sale,
otherwise they make the profit while the public pays their real
costs. Oil companies would not report the profits they do if they
paid for recycling their products. Right now there are 3.5 million
tons of garbage in the Pacific Ocean, 80% of it plastics. The fish
eat it, we eat it and the domino effect is health problems including
cancers.

If we don't recycle responsibly we leave it up to our bodies to do at
a big price to health.

There shouldn't be a loophole, poisoning the planet for any reason is
illegal. It isn't definable as sustainable.

How does a baby that has never taken a breath have hundreds of cancer
causing chemicals inside them? We aren't recycling industry's waste
so their bodies are except the little guys aren't protected.
Posted by Thermoguy
24th Nov 2009
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!