Follow this blog:
RSS

Umbrellas versus funnels, and five other lessons in innovation from Google

By | March 18, 2010, 12:56 PM PDT

In recent years, the world has been all googly-eyed over Google. It’s important to note that the online giant didn’t achieve its extraordinary valuation, rising prominence, and outright dominance in online markets by building wonderful cafeterias and volleyball courts for its employees. Rather, it’s the way employees are encouraged to use their heads, and pursue new ideas. The stated ideal: let nothing stand in the way of a new idea.

At the SXSW new media conference (South by Southwest Interactive) in Austin, Steve Myers of the Poynter Institute attended a session led by several Google employees, who shared at least six pointers for freeing up talent for innovation:

  • Strive for a goal, even if you don’t know how to achieve it: Jonathan Perlow, a senior engineer on the Gmail team: “Either we’re going to figure out how to make a great user experience or we’ll die trying,” Perlow said. “Most of the things we try, fail.”
  • Create a culture of execution: Edward Ho, the technical lead for Google Buzz: Even in the most virtual company in the world, physical proximity made a difference. People on his team sit in an open area, “unnaturally close together,” so they can communicate immediately, face-to-face. “Without leaving a chair…. No e-mails, no IMs, no meetings, just move on.”
  • Be an umbrella, not a funnel: Todd Jackson, product manager for Gmail and Google Buzz: Protect your employees from organizational distractions. Stop funneling distractions down to employees, and act as an umbrella instead.
  • Empower employees to act on ideas: Todd Jackson: “Any engineer on our team is empowered to try something they feel strongly about.”
  • Avoid feature creep: Arielle Reinstein, product marketing manager: Engineers at Gmail constantly balance adding new features against maintaining speed.
  • Communicate well with customers and stakeholders: As shown by Google Buzz and the privacy concerns it created, Google needs to work on this. Jackson: “We’ll probably have to engage our users better on future developments like this.”

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Joe McKendrick

About Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick

Contributing Editor, Business

Joe McKendrick is an independent analyst who tracks the impact of information technology on management and markets. He is the author of the SOA Manifesto and has written for Forbes, ZDNet and Database Trends & Applications. He holds a degree from Temple University. He is based in Pennsylvania.

Follow him on Twitter.

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick is an independent consultant and editor. Joe has performed project work for the following companies in the IT marketspace: IBM, Systinet/HP, Teradata. He has performed project work for the following organizations in partnership with Unisphere Research (Unisphere Media): IBM, Oracle Corp., International Oracle Users Group, Oracle Applications Users Group, Professional Association for SQL Server, International DB2 Users Group, International Sybase Users Group.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

6
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Pet Peeve
The past tense of "lead" is "led."
Posted by DittoHeadStL
22nd Mar 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Great for innovation, not so great for products
These are good ideas for innovation, but Google needs to focus more on making real products. Enough with the Google beta syndrome that leaves users with a dead product. Unfortunately, they will find that making complete products will force them to work among many different departments besides engineering (a glaring omission in the article) and will work against some of the principles outlined here.

It's the eternal tug-of-war between innovation and making real products people can use.
Posted by zackers
22nd Mar 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Umbrellas versus funnels, and five other lessons in innovation from Goo
Interesting.

Is this list incomplete?

I didn't see the part about blatantly duplicating the product of
your business partner and calling that innovation.

Or was that implied?
Posted by Jkirk3279
23rd Mar 2010
0 Votes
+ -
@jkirk3279
Speaking about Apple, I suppose?

The list of open source projects from which Apple takes but gives very little back is very long:

* glibc, the basic c library foundation for almost all of apple's software: taken from GNU
* gcc: the compiler collection: taken from GNU
* BSD kernel and userspace tools: taken from freebsd project. Also they closed up the source repositories and only give back _after_ a new OS X comes out. There is no more shared development process.
* X11 server: taken from XFree86 and later Xorg foundation. giving Apple free access to tens of thousands of programs written for Linux and earlier UNIX systems.
* All the thousands of free software coming from the Linux communities: freely ported to OS X.
* MACH micro kernel: Carnegie Mellon Uni.
* CUPS printing system: open source project/company bought by apple.
* Cocoa: == nextstep further developed by Apple. Brought in by Jobs when he came back from Nextstep to Apple. Based on objective C, which is one of the compilers in gcc.
* First idea for gui based on windows, icons, menus, pointer, "WIMP": taken from Xerox. X window system (the linux and unix windowing system) and old Mac OS originated in 1984, but the X window system was way way ahead of mac OS at the time, being network transparent, multitasking and more. And modern X11 still is ahead of Quartz, the system in OS X.
* Safari: the core of safari is webkit, which is derived from KHTML, a KDE project, which is a linux community project. KDE is one of the major desktop environments for linux.
* The list goes on and on and on. But maybe other people will bother adding items that are freely given to apple, or taken by them

Now Apple is taking HTC and nokia to court over alleged patent violations. But these patents should never have been given to them in the first place, as they are about completely obvious non-inventions. Most of them have are not in the least original, because extensive prior art exist, in other words other people had long invented the same things or very similar in the eighties or earlier.

I have always found Apple a bad open source citizen: threatening open source projects over stupid things like "font hinting" and not providing iTunes for linux users, worse, even on purpose changing their iTunes format all the time to break iPod compatibility with linux programs like Rhythmbox and gpod. These lawsuits by Apple are also an attack on the open source community by proxy: if Apple wins, a lot of open source software will not be possible to make or distribute anymore.

It is true to say that Apple survived thanks in large part by what the got from the open source community. But they give **** for thanks back.

I hope that the open source community starts realising what Apple actually is, and does. Maybe they will stop giving Apple the free ride it has enjoyed so very much until today. If all open source is ripped out of OS X, there is almost nothing left.

Apple does make beautiful hardware and very slick software, which is why they get away with the same behaviour that Microsoft is shunned for by the open source community. That will change soon enough once people start realising the danger coming from Apple.

I also hope that HTC, Nokia and Google will teach Apple a dire lesson in court.
Posted by perpetualrabbit
24th Mar 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Umbrellas versus funnels, and five other lessons in innovation from Google
Joe McKendrick In a five-month timeframe, we migrated roughly 30,000 people to a hosted solution, without impacting their business or interrupting their day-to-day operations.
Esat Sezer
CIO, CCE This is from Coke Cola. This is from me. I have 2 comments on this. I do not think many may like this especially the politicians. I , me, you and many for that matter all, consider that the politicians are corrupt , never keeping the promise, giving us the stories of, "Subject to, provided, albeit, in due course, if we can we will, in near future, of course we all care for you. Here this is you tax bill reduced by $2 from 1989 to date". The Global warming and the troops going to wars wrapped coming back in the warped coffins. I really feel sad about this. However, there you are, to stop this empty piggy bank filling and make some kick at least few politicians while they go out taking a jet without telling anyone. They call this a lightening visit. Why? They think the numbers have gone up or troops are lazy. Who is spying for these anyway? Brown, Obama, Blaire all rush out to Iraq and Afghanistan. May be you have some idea. I am taking my dog for a walk. I thank you Firozali A.Mulla DBA
Posted by famulla
29th Mar 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Umbrellas versus funnels, and five other lessons in innovation from Google
Great!!! thanks for sharing this information to us!
Posted by birumut
9th Feb 2011
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet Community and join the conversation! Signing-up is free and quick, Do it now, we want to hear your opinion.