Follow this blog:
RSS

Talking trash: Are we at the tipping point as far as recycling?

By | November 4, 2009, 6:25 AM PST

There’s a new report out from the American Beverage Association (courtesy of research by R.W. Beck) that suggests almost three-quarters of Americans “have access” to a curbside recycling program. That’s 229 million people. Which suggests, of course, that almost 25 percent of Americans do not “have access.”

I put the words “have access” in quotes because I think access has different meanings for different people.

Indeed, according to the report, an estimated 30 million to 60 million American residents live in places where there is curbside trash pick-up but no support for recyclable pick-up. You can download the entire report here to dive deeper into all the stats.

Recycling still remains a complex debate in communities across the nation, of course. North Carolina went so far as to ban plastic bottles from “regular” household trash earlier this year because recycling rates were so low.

Sadly, I really think that it’s going to take more proactive, punitive actions like these to boost recycling or re-usage in general. It’s just not easy enough. Personally, I think many of the policies are still rooted in the past. I mean, come on, what is “regular” garbage anyway? Why shouldn’t our entire garbage can be sorted for recyclables.

It’s too bad that plastic containers were viewed as so radically different than glass when it first really came onto the scene. We were taught to think of them as disposable. Think about it: It was common practice for people to return glass bottles, because it was a habit. Heck, up until the time I graduated from high school, my family actually had a milk deliveryman, who delivered milk in glass bottles. We need to reprogram people to start thinking about plastics in a similar way.

The point of this new research is that we DO have the infrastructure in place across a large part of the country to really address how we handle all or trash. Instead of considering this as a burden, communities should start looking at ways that recycling everything possible can become a source of revenue. There must be an entrepreneurial sort out there with some ideas.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Heather Clancy

About Heather Clancy

Heather Clancy is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Heather Clancy

Heather Clancy

Contributing Editor, Business

Heather Clancy has written for United Press International, ZDNet, Entrepreneur, Fortune Small Business, the International Herald Tribune and the New York Times. She holds a degree from McGill University. She is based in New Jersey.

Follow her on Twitter.

Heather Clancy

Heather Clancy
Writing publicly about what the high-tech industry is actually doing to help itself and the world get greener or more sustainable is one way I figure I can contribute more meaningfully to said effort. I'm also a big OMG-kind-of-fan of smart leadership, which is why the goodly folks who publish this blog let me go on about this topic and why I am always on the hunt for forward-looking business management ideas.

My daily writing is focused on looking for topics for my blogs, GreenTech Pastures and Business Brains. I also write often about emerging technology trends such as mobile computing, unified communications and cloud computing. Occasionally, I will pop up at an industry conference in some sort of speaking capacity. In cases where a speaking engagement involves a sponsor that may be covered in this blog, that fact will be disclosed in coverage as appropriate.

My corporate writing work usually consists of crafting research white papers about some aspect of technology. In the event that my commentary (in written, audio or video form) mentions a company for which I have provided consulting advice, I will disclose that fact. However, there is no connection between these projects and the topics that I'm covering in my blog.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

6
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Talking trash: Are we at the tipping point as far as recycling?
I don't know...I read somewhere that over 50% of what is sent to
recycling centers ends up in land fills anyway. Not enough demand yet.
Posted by jrj001
4th Nov 2009
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Talking trash: Are we at the tipping point as far as recycling?
"Sadly, I really think that it?s going to take more proactive, punitive actions like these to boost recycling or re-usage in general. It?s just not easy enough. Personally, I think many of the policies are still rooted in the past. I mean, come on, what is ?regular? garbage anyway? Why shouldn?t our entire garbage can be sorted for recyclables."

That is the problem in a nutshell. However, it is not individuals that require "punitive" actions, it is states, cities and rural communities based on a national mandate and federal funding. It is preposterously difficult to "sort out" what is to be recycled and what not. I myself am fanatic about recycling, but refuse to participate in half-ass, unfunded "the burden's on you" measures.

The above articles notion that it should be "profitable" is, however, utterly wrong-headed. If there is money to be made, fine, but recycling should not be contingent upon it. That is precisely why recycling is half-ass and too complicated, and sloughed off on individual consumers instead of manufacturers and government.

Just look at plastic. You have to decipher some cryptic, illegible symbol hidden somewhere on the bottle, then determine its secret meaning, then what if it does not fit the current bill for what is recyclable? Every damn thing that can be recycled should be recycled, at whatever taxpayer and/or manufactuer and/or consumer expense, without any requirement of income from the recycling, and it must be done in as simple and convenient a way as may be conceivable for individuals to perform, and yes under draconian federal penalties levied on whatever state or municipality fails to do so.

The lion's share of the funding burden should be on the manufacturers and the consumers, but the sorting and collection burden should be squarely on the state.

And too true, much if not most of what is collected for "recycling" programs ends up in landfills, which is preposterous.
Posted by stevenjs
4th Nov 2009
-1 Votes
+ -
RE: Talking trash: Are we at the tipping point as far as recycling?
I believe that the real problem lies in the basic services offered by the trash companies, or the municipalities respectively. Almost all cities where I have looked into this issue charge a premium price TO recycle. That is not wise. Most people I know would gladly do daily recycling if it did not mean an extra expense, much sorting of trash, or extra work to get it to a recycling facility. As mentioned in the original article, not all areas even offer curbside recycling service. I used to live in Akron, OH and they eventually got the message. At first they did as all others did, they charged more TO recycle than not to. But it did not work, just like everywhere else. Then they changed the way they looked at the situation. They charged ever so slightly MORE money to NOT recycle. It was not a large difference in money, only a slight amount. It suddenly became cheaper TO recycle and everyone does it now. As far as what happens to the materials after it leaves your curb is up to the trash companies from there. I have no doubts that there are infrastructure problems with the process of recycling, therefore the issue of recyclables ending up in landfills. This is an issue which absolutely needs addressed and resolved. My guess is that this particular problem is more political than real. If everyone got serious about recycling it would happen properly.
Posted by tvride
5th Nov 2009
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Talking trash: Are we at the tipping point as far as recycling?
For anyone interested in the website for Akron, OH recycling services and some info about what happens to said recycled materials, the following is the web address to enter.

http://www.ci.akron.oh.us/pubwks02.html
Posted by tvride
5th Nov 2009
+1 Vote
+ -
Sorting through trash
Hmmm, sounds like a worthwhile way to employ the "legally challenged"
or inmates as they're often called.
Personally, I prefer the term "parasite".
Oh wait, can't do that.
That may be an infringement of their "rights".
Yeah, right.
Posted by martian@...
5th Nov 2009
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Talking trash: Are we at the tipping point as far as recycling?
In our short-sighted community, we were in danger of being fined up to $500 a day because of some 183 used tires we had. I was in the process of trying to find somewhere to recycle them, but when threatened with the fine ran out of options and time.
Posted by foggy@...
11th Nov 2009
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet Community and join the conversation! Signing-up is free and quick, Do it now, we want to hear your opinion.