Follow this blog:
RSS

Smart grid may crush power companies at unexpected moments: MIT study

By | August 8, 2011, 2:30 PM PDT

The smart grid could go a long way in conserving energy and smoothing out load demand for the nation’s utilities. Researchers at MIT however, say there may be a law of unintended consequences at work with smart grid. If too many people set appliances to turn on, or devices to recharge, when the price of electricity crosses the same threshold, it could cause a huge spike in demand — and potentially overload the power grid, they surmise.

Kind of like an e-commerce site going down at a half-price sale, without having additional servers online to carry the extra load. Or a store getting crushed on Black Friday.

In a paper presented at a recent IEEE conference, the researchers, Mardavij Roozbehani, Sanjoy Mitter and
Munther Dahleh, warn about the issues utilities could face as the smart grid expands.

Electricity consumers will act just as rationally as they would for any other type of good or service: that is, they’ll try to get as much convenience for as little money as possible. Smart grid devices provide real-time information on when electricity is retailing for less.

Roozbehani says he and his team determined that if that a there were a sudden shift of millions of devices to a low-demand period, this would increase the load and require re-firing up generators, which will tax the grid in unanticipated ways.

Roozbehanihe cautions:

“For the system to work, supply and demand must match almost perfectly at each instant of time. The generators have what are called ‘ramp constraints’: They cannot ramp up their production arbitrarily fast, and they cannot ramp it down arbitrarily fast. If these oscillations become very wild, they’ll have a hard time keeping track of the demand. And that’s bad for everyone.”

However, it wouldn’t make sense to back off on flexible pricing, either, they say. If pricing isn’t flexible enough to shape demand, there’s no point in installing smart meters, which are intended to give customers real-time information about fluctuations in the price of electricity, and thus encourage them to defer some energy-intensive tasks until supply is high or demand is low.

Smoothing out load profiles — so that as much electricity consumption as possible is shifted away from peak periods (such as 9 to 5 on summer days) to off-peak periods is a challenge utilities have been wrestling with for decades. Are the researchers suggesting that they ought to be careful for what they wish for?

Roozbehani suggests that there be more communications between utilities and consumers. One idea is to ask customers, through questionnaires, how they would respond to different prices at different times. Then, utilities then could more effectively tune the prices that they pass to consumers much more precisely, to maximize responsiveness to fluctuations in the market while minimizing the risk of instability.

Roozbehani admits, however, that collecting that information would be difficult.

The researchers didn’t address this, but perhaps this is a ripe area for even greater analytics. The smart grid could respond to in-depth data pertaining to consumers’ price sensitivity with various devices (air conditioning versus  cell-phone charging).

(Photo Credit: Wikipedia.)

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Joe McKendrick

About Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick

Contributing Editor, Business

Joe McKendrick is an independent analyst who tracks the impact of information technology on management and markets. He is the author of the SOA Manifesto and has written for Forbes, ZDNet and Database Trends & Applications. He holds a degree from Temple University. He is based in Pennsylvania.

Follow him on Twitter.

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick is an independent consultant and editor. Joe has performed project work for the following companies in the IT marketspace: IBM, Systinet/HP, Teradata. He has performed project work for the following organizations in partnership with Unisphere Research (Unisphere Media): IBM, Oracle Corp., International Oracle Users Group, Oracle Applications Users Group, Professional Association for SQL Server, International DB2 Users Group, International Sybase Users Group.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
14
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
Makes little sense.
Flexible smart pricing is supposed to be designed to prevent this problem. If this happens, it only means that their pricing mechanism is incorrect.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
10th Aug
+1 Vote
+ -
Devices should ask permission to start
The owner could set a device to start once the price drops below a threshold but the device also needs to get permission from the smart grid to start as well so the start-up loads can be managed. A long time ago now we had a cabinet with 8 disk drives in it (17 inch platters about 10 inches tall each). If all 8 drives tried to spin up at the same time it would have blown the circuit breakers so the starting of the drives from a powered down state was staged so one would spin up before the next one started. Took about 3 minutes total for all of them to spin up.
Posted by riverat1
10th Aug
+1 Vote
+ -
Don't hold your breath
While this article brings up good points, we are at least a decade or more from wide deployment of smart grid at the consumer level. I live in Boulder, CO, which in 2008 was selected to become the first fully equipped smart grid city in the nation courtesy of our power utility Xcel. What happened? Xcel put in a fiber optic network to every home in the city (don't ask me why all that bandwidth is needed). But instead of costing $15 million as originally estimated, it cost $45 million. And debates over standards kept anything from being implemented. The net result is that all the fiber optic network is being used for is remote reading of our power meters.

Recently Boulder has withdrawn all support for the smart grid project. In fact, it's so mad at Xcel for this and other perceived injustices that it wants to form its own municipal power utility. Because the city doesn't want to pay Xcel the $45 million for the fiber optic network, it probably will be abandoned. Xcel already has the authority to get back the $45 million by charging all its ratepayers across the state since it was a demo project meant to eventually benefit everyone. The irony is that once Boulder separates from Xcel, we won't have to pay for any of it.

At $45 million I don't know if anybody can repurpose the network and compete with Comcast for providing broadband to the home. Boulder will probably be the first city in the nation to abandon a working gigabit network to each home that has already been installed. So much for progress.
Posted by zackers
Updated - 11th Aug
+1 Vote
+ -
Wow.
That is what happens when people make decisions without all the facts. Much of this smart grid talk is still theory. No one has built even a neighboorhood or city block as an example of a smart grid. Why are they trying to tackle a city first?

I could fill pages with alternative options to building a $45 million fiber network to manage meters. I can assure you all of them would cost 1/10 th what they paid.
Posted by Hates Idiots
11th Aug
+1 Vote
+ -
Sucks to be a Boulder resident
Man I'm sorry for all you guys.

Really as soon as Xcel proposed this FTTH network for smart grid, your city leaders should have told Xcel they were no longer interested in it, or allowing Xcel to get ratepayer reimbursement. There isn't a need for a 50,000,000 bit per second fiber connection to the smart grid control center, you only need about a 50 bit per second over the air link. It was grossly overspeced, and overbuilt, and overspent.

Really at this point if I was a city leader, I'd tell Xcel they won't get ratepayer reimbursement, but the city should set up a wholly owned private company to offer to purchase the fiber network back from Xcel for the $45 million, and provide home broadband, and possibly TV, and telephone service.
Posted by colinnwn
12th Aug
+1 Vote
+ -
Smart grid was a payoff
The official reason Boulder got chosen as the site for the smart grid demo was that the city was about the right size, has a very tech savvy populace, and has many residents who are attracted to "green" projects. The city actually has a "Climate Action Plan" tax on our electric bills of a few dollars per month that's supposed to make us compliant with Kyoto (which anybody knows can't possibly be enough for such a big project).

But the real reason Boulder got the smart grid project in 2008 was that the city back then was making serious noises about withdrawing from Xcel and starting its own municipal utility by forcing Xcel to sell us the coal plant that's in town. So Xcel got Boulder to abandon its plans back then by dangling smart grid in front of it.

Flash forward to today. Now the coal plant is a "monstrosity" that last year Boulder residents protested in front of until Xcel promised to shut it down in 2016 (some Boulder residents are still demonstrating in front of it because 2016 is too far off in the future). Xcel, which provides 14% wind power and is closing down other coal plants and installing natural gas, has been deemed by the city council to not be green enough. So now the city council and most of the city is again banging the drums for a municipal utility, this time without owning any actual power generation sources except a little hydro. Boulder and Xcel cannot come to agreement over how much Xcel's facilities in Boulder are worth (Boulder says $160 million, Xcel says $1.2 billion, the real price is somewhere in the middle) and it looks like this will drag out in court for years. Meanwhile, most of the business community is very concerned about future pricing (low price is a secondary goal to having renewable power) and reliability of something as fundamental as electricity.

Yes, it sucks to be a Boulder resident. But most of us do not know it. There's a vote coming this fall and it looks like about 70% of the residents will approve the municipalization effort.
Posted by zackers
Updated - 15th Aug
+1 Vote
+ -
People do respond to off peak pricing.
For years people in states with off peak pricing have been taking advantage of it by doing laundry and other energy intensive tasks after the price drops. The problem has always been convenience, which has kept the number of people doing it to a minimum.

MIT rightly points out that increasing appliance automation will make it far easier for vast numbers of people to run the washer, dryer or what ever after the rates go down.

Another unintended consequence is that after hours maintenance windows when a neighborhood grid could be safely taken off line for 15 minutes to swap out a failing transformer will vanish when you have heavier loads at night. Routine maintenance will become more disruptive when that brief 1 street outage causes 50 automated household chores to fail. I can hear the complaint calls now.
Posted by Hates Idiots
11th Aug
-1 Votes
+ -
Sounds like the customer's choice
If regular MX resulted in fluxuating prices caused automated tasks to fail, I'd have a hard time placing any blame with the utility company. It sounds like the customers failed to put the correct parameters on their appliances. If you want to be sure you have clean dishes in the morning, you should have programmed your dishwasher to wait for the price of electricity to hit 5 cents per kwh, and if this hasn't happened by 5am, run anyway at any electricity price.
Posted by colinnwn
12th Aug
+1 Vote
+ -
It is embarrassing MIT level researchers put out this information
This has been a mostly solved problem in network and communcation management for decades. The roots of the problem and solution predate the internet communication protocols.

The answer is for every device programmed to turn on at a specific energy cost, to wait a random number of seconds before activating (perhaps no less than 10 seconds and no more than 100) once the conditions of operation are met, and before it activates, be sure to receive the current price of power one more time and verify that the cost is still within the programmed parameters.

In the case of such a demand spike that could destabilize the grid caused by low energy pricing, appliances would slowly start ramping up, and as the demand went up, the power company's control center would have time to calculate and distribute higher pricing information to cause other appliances to choose to wait again rather than activate and exceed the energy supply.
Posted by colinnwn
12th Aug
+1 Vote
+ -
The dumb solution will still work ...
Many appliances now have a 'delayed start' facility to take advantage of off peak prices. The old 'set the delay time' rotary control has been replaced on modern units by preset values - typically 1, 3 or 6 hours. This means the householder cannot choose a popular time to fire up the device, but only a preselected time based on 'time now'. The result for the utility company - staggered load changes.

Staggeringly simple (sorry!) and so much more dumb cleverer than the smart system!
Posted by PassingWind
12th Aug
+1 Vote
+ -
But how much savings/shifting really
My furnace will run when it's cold, the air when it's warm, the TV when the show I want to watch is on, my computer (well all the time), lights when it's dark, frig, freezer, pumps when needed etc.

So what can I shift, dish washer, washer, dryer.
Even in a big household I can't see these saving a lot of electricity (our house is nat gas) so somehow it eludes me the push to a 'smart grid'. Some savings yes, but not enough make any real expenditures worthwhile.

What I think of as a smart grid is the ability to shift extra capacity to where it's needed easily and efficiently. If we have extra capacity here, it is difficult to move it very far to someplace else that needs it. The was an article a while back that highlighted this, even a couple of areas just a few hundred miles apart that often had but couldn't shift the excess capacity.
Posted by knudson
12th Aug
+1 Vote
+ -
Terrawatt powerline ...
... from the West coast to the East coast?

Pumped hydro-electric energy storage?

All publicly funded to make useful work now,
privatized later (at a profit) to reduce the deficit.

Joined up planning?
Posted by PassingWind
Updated - 13th Aug
+1 Vote
+ -
What are they doing in Europe?
Do we have dumb grids and Europeans have smart grids?
Are they not subject to the same problems as us?
If not, why not?
Their phone systems always seem to be years ahead of our, what about their transmission systems?
What are they doing right that we are doing wrong?
Instead of reinventing the wheel, why not simply do what they are doing?
Posted by PSFTGURU@...
16th Aug
+1 Vote
+ -
Don't follow Europe ...
... at least don't follow the UK! Their idea of forward thinking is to follow anything that hasn't worked for the US. Their much loved (by the people) health care is by design being 'fixed' to have all the problems the US has. Their much vaunted education system - ditto.

I think it's because when anything is renowned for working in the UK, politicians want to get involved as ploy to enhance their reputation. So they devise a plan to 'take it to the next stage'. Devoid of imagination or competence, they look to see what the good old US is doing, assume that is the future, and 'invent' something remarkably similar in the hopes that it will make them famous.

Then cozy up to a newspaper or two to get it hyped, planning to retire to a peerage before the next lot have to explain why the square peg doesn't fit the round hole.

So who would you follow. The French? the Germans? the Belgians? LOL!
Posted by PassingWind
Updated - 17th Aug
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!