Follow this blog:
RSS

Should managers consider new diversity policies protecting men?

By | August 11, 2009, 9:36 AM PDT

The current recession appears to be affecting employment among men more disproportionately than women, according to the Economix blog published by The New York Times.

Because many of the layoffs in the current recession have been centered on industries such as manufacturing and construction, traditional male strongholds, men have been harder hit by job cuts. I don’t have to source this data, because it is pretty obvious in the latest nonfarm payroll data. Meanwhile, education and healthcare have fared relatively well, a factor that has served to prop up the number of women in the workforce when compared with men.

No brainer.

According the Bureau of Labor Statistics, as of June 2009, women held 49.83 percent of all nonfarm payroll positions, while men held 50.17 percent.

Does this mean that we should all worry about embracing policies and management styles that are more suited to motivated females than males. Yes, there is a difference in how males and females react to management techniques, just as there is a difference in the way that men and women manage as discussed in this blog entry from a few days ago.

Before you go retooling your entire management philosophy, consider that history may be repeating itself. Apparently, the last recession in 2001 brought a similar disparity in terms of job cuts.

Still I would be willing to bet that the Obama administration’s prioritization of healthcare as a major national priority will prompt many of the people let go in the current wave of layoffs to rethink their careers entirely. Who knows, soon women in healthcare may find themselves facing the same dilemma once faced by white males: hiring policies intended to encourage ethnic and gender diversity.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Heather Clancy

About Heather Clancy

Heather Clancy is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Heather Clancy

Heather Clancy

Contributing Editor

Heather Clancy has written for United Press International, ZDNet, Entrepreneur, Fortune Small Business, the International Herald Tribune and the New York Times. She holds a degree from McGill University. She is based in New Jersey.

Follow her on Twitter.

Heather Clancy

Heather Clancy

I am fascinated about how businesses of all sizes can transform their operations through technology -- not just to make themselves more efficient, but to rise above their competitors. That's the theme for my two ZDNet blogs, Small Business Matters and Next-Gen Partner. For SmartPlanet, I'm focused on profiling inspirational and controversial business leaders who have great leadership lessons to share. I also write regularly and passionately about corporate social responsibility and sustainability issues for GreenBiz.com.

Occasionally, I will pop up at an industry conference in some sort of speaking capacity. In cases where an engagement involves a sponsor that may be covered in this blog, that fact will be disclosed in coverage as appropriate.

My corporate writing work usually consists of crafting research white papers about some aspect of technology or moderating Webcasts. In the event that my commentary (in written, audio or video form) mentions a company for which I have provided consulting advice, I will disclose that fact. However, there is no connection between these projects and topics that I cover in my blogs.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
5
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Should managers consider new diversity policies protecting men?
I would assume that most of the departments are already following management styles suited for their department. Since recession affects all people in a department equally, there shouldn't be any change required in management styles.

This article made me wonder though .. How do management styles vary for males vs females employees?

Dating for single professionals
Posted by ryan-s
11th Aug 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Should managers consider new diversity policies protecting men?
Stop burdening management with more policy. It's just more bs paperwork.

As far as women in healthcare, they are already facing issues such as jobs like X-ray technicians going overseas to countries such as Australia and nurses are replaced by nurse technicians in an effort to reduce costs. If Obama's plan does anything, it will be force hospitals to replace American citizens with foreign labor and lower ranked positions to reduce costs.

When Google finishes the TransPacific internet cabling more jobs in healthcare (and legal services, engineering, and other technical professions) will continue to go overseas where labor is cheap. So even changing policy isn't really going to help stop the shift in labor. Men have been traditionally expensive to employ but Americans in general are expensive to employ.

The reality is that the highcost of living and employment in America is going to be the next big issue after healthcare.

So I wouldn't look to healthcare as the "panacea" for unemployment or shifts in labor. Americans cost too much to employ under the traditional systems regardless of the American legal system (which provides more protection to companies) and the American work ethic (we have a better concept of on-demand and on-time than most places in the world) isn't going to make a difference unless the media helps. Companies will take the risk of going overseas rather than pay American workers the big salaries that they pay in the big cities.

Unless, companies want to build up the mid-west and southern technology corridors which have lower costs all round rather than continue developing in overburdened areas such as Boston, New York and the West Coast. Rather than burdening management with more policies, figure out how to solve the issue of labor.
Posted by maoszman804
11th Aug 2009
0 Votes
+ -
This article makes no sense
See subject. Why would there be a need to protect men? Sure men make up a smaller portion of healthcare, but I have only met one man who did not find healthcare work of the non-doctor variety demeaning. The choice to go into nursing or other fields is one many men do not take not because they don't think they are good enough, but because they don't want to. Perhaps more men will choose Remember, many programs to help women have been put in place because society has long told women they are no good at math, physics, managing money, etc. It is a completely different reason for men.

As opposed to protecting these "manly jobs" it is supply an demand. Society still encourages men to take more risks than women. If a man chose a job in a risky field for a higher pay, why should he be handed the job of a woman who chose a safer job for less pay.

Our society has become too concerned with blind equality and not enough with informed fairness. No one should get a job due to gender, religion, or skin color, jobs should always go to those most suitable to performing them. One should not be chosen for a job because they are black any more than one chosen for a job because they are white. Same goes with women and men. The policies raised in the past were made because the employers tended to be white men who wanted to hire more white men.

As there are still white men on hiring committees today, we have not gotten to the point that we need to protect white males. I say quash unfairness when it arises (such as with those firefighters last month), and worry about fairness more than equality in terms of numbers in the job market. I would much rather hire ten women who know how to do their job and ask for a wage reflective of their job than have to hire five men who think the job is beneath them, shirk their work, but still whine for a raise every month.
Posted by kymac
12th Aug 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Should managers consider new diversity policies protecting men?
@kguzzi -- You write " No one should get a job due to gender, religion, or skin color, jobs should always go to those most suitable to performing them." In an ideal world, perhaps. But we live in a society that still has minority preference, pardon me, "affirmative action" laws & policies.

In higher education, the "business" I'm most familiar with, there are certain areas that have been carved out for others than white males: gender studies, affirmative action & Afro-American studies are the three most obvious examples. Colleagues on search committees report having seen equally qualified white males turned down even though these individuals have come from institutions where they were employed in the very departments and units to which they were applying elsewhere.

In higher education, some hiring committees have a token white male, who may even be an upper classman or graduate student, not a faculty member or administrator.

Higher education may be an atypical business, but the situation is often Orwellian: "all candidates are equal, but some candidates are more equal than others."
Posted by brambeus
14th Aug 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Should managers consider new diversity policies protecting men?
All of these kinds of policies are un-American. Of course the dirty, dangerous, unpleasant jobs go proportionately to men, and men are more likely to get the layoff papers since a female or minority layoff involves a high probability of very expensive discrimination lawsuits. Let us face facts, white males, we are expendable, and inevitably will end up making less money unless it is for a really crappy job the privileged classes do not want.. Since if you make less than a female, you are a dog dirt loser in their eyes, where are we headed?
Posted by dixon757@...
21st Aug 2009
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!