Follow this blog:
RSS

Shortages of tech-savvy workers may derail manufacturing boom

By | March 8, 2012, 11:00 AM PST

Lately, manufacturing in North America has been booming. However, the boom may be running into a roadblock. Not because of soft demand or a down economy, but because of a lack of skilled workers who can run a new generation of digitized production systems.

High technology production floors now produce a lot more than jets.

Consider this bellwether: The Association For Manufacturing Technology and AMTDA, the American Machine Tool Distributors’ Association’s USMTO (United States Manufacturing Technology Orders) program. AMTDA reports that USMTO companies reported $5,508.81 million of orders in 2011, up more than 66% over 2010. “USMTO finished its strongest year in more than a decade as manufacturing led the U.S. recovery into 2012,” according to AMT President Douglas Woods. “The increase is nearly 20 points higher than forecasters predicted.”

The USMTO report provides regional and national U.S. orders data of domestic and imported machine tools and related equipment. Analysis of manufacturing technology orders provides a reliable leading economic indicator as manufacturing industries invest in capital metalworking equipment to increase capacity and improve productivity.

The problem is: can companies keep hiring and retaining enough talent to keep the boom going? A report from Deloitte and The Manufacturing Institute, issued at the end of 2011, finds talent shortages are growing more acute. “Shortages in skilled production jobs – machinists, operators, craft workers, distributors, technicians, and more – are taking their toll on manufacturers’ ability to expand operations, drive innovation, and improve productivity. Seventy-four percent of respondents indicated that workforce shortages or skills deficiencies in skilled production roles are having a significant impact on their ability to expand operations or improve productivity. Unfortunately, these jobs require the most training, and are traditionally among the hardest manufacturing jobs to find existing talent to fill.”

Anecdotes abound. For example, it has just been reported how one company in Kentucky is now offering $2,500 bonuses to welders who sign on for jobs, and another in Michigan is offering a $4,000 education bonus for production workers, and another in Washington state is offering recruiting bonuses to current employees. Still, these companies are struggling to fill positions.

Deloitte and the Manufacturing Institute point out that paradoxically, while unemployment is still high, as many as 600,000 jobs are going unfilled among manufacturers. Respondents report “that the national education curriculum is not producing workers with the basic skills they need – a trend not likely to improve in the near term.”  Skills in need not only include process automation, but also problem-solving abilities.

A consortium of 4,200 middle and high schools, as reported by Reuters, has developed a technology-driven curriculum to attempt to address these issues. Project Lead the Way offers hands-on courses in industrial automation, robotics and green energy.

In his latest Washington Post column, Vivek Wadhwa described the skills needed to run today’s and tomorrow’s manufacturing operations. At the materials level, he observes, employers are hungry for individuals with the abilities to deliver new products with the latest generation of lightweight, composite materials, requiring “innovations in material processing technologies and more highly skilled employees to manage the complex, new manufacturing processes. Prospective employees will need extensive training in order to work in this new environment.

The growth of 3D modeling and printing within manufacturing processes also calls for more highly skilled workers, Wadhwa adds. “In a new method called ‘additive manufacturing,’ parts are produced by melting successive layers of materials based on 3D models—adding materials rather than subtracting them. This allows manufacturers to create complex objects without any sort of tools or fixtures. The process also doesn’t produce any waste material. 3D printing is only one example of ‘additive manufacturing.’ This new manufacturing environment will also need legions of 3D designers and people who can operate and maintain sophisticated computer-based equipment.”  Additional skills require knowledge of simulation and virtual control systems — all part of  today’s information technology-driven manufacturing plants.

In their report, Deloitte and The Manufacturing Institute urge a wide range of strategies to help address the shortages, from more science, technology and mathematics training in schools and colleges to more comprehensive career development and training programs among current employees. Strategies such as “competency modeling” — using analytics to predict skill requirements and match them with current employees — are still in the minority of companies, but need to move forward. “Today, only 31% of respondent-companies report having formal career development, and only 17% of the respondents report using competency model tools,” the report observes.

Additional strategies include developing knowledge management systems that can capturing critical information from older or retiring workers and pass it on to newer and younger workers. This “can help reduce training time, can improve collaboration and communication, and even help companies get to market faster by leveraging previous programs,” the report says. Also, consider bringing those retired employees back.

(Photo credit: US Navy, via Wikimedia.)

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Joe McKendrick

About Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick

Contributing Editor, Business

Joe McKendrick is an independent analyst who tracks the impact of information technology on management and markets. He is the author of the SOA Manifesto and has written for Forbes, ZDNet and Database Trends & Applications. He holds a degree from Temple University. He is based in Pennsylvania.

Follow him on Twitter.

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick is an independent consultant and editor. Joe has performed project work for the following companies in the IT marketspace: IBM, Systinet/HP, Teradata. He has performed project work for the following organizations in partnership with Unisphere Research (Unisphere Media): IBM, Oracle Corp., International Oracle Users Group, Oracle Applications Users Group, Professional Association for SQL Server, International DB2 Users Group, International Sybase Users Group.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
29
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Get what you ask for.
This is what happens when you set low national standards on the quality of education k through 12 and you encourage most students of higher education to get liberal arts degrees instead of degrees in math or science fields.
Posted by Hates Idiots
8th Mar 2012
+1 Vote
+ -
Calling B.S.
@Hates Idiots, I'm calling B.S. on you:

Data trumps anecdotes masquerading as proof. Logic trumps pander-sound bites. Below data is from the National Center for Education Statistics. It lists U.S. citizen and permanent resident STEM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics) related degrees conferred 2008 and 2009. Then, below that is another list from the Foreign Labor Certification Annual Report listing the occupations with more than 1000 permanent (residence) labor certifications, with the Office of Employment Statistics employment levels and gain/loss. Please read and understand what the data says ??? that there is NO shortage of US workers.

From the National Center for Education Statistics
_U.S._Citizen_and_Permanent_Resident_ STEM Related Degrees Conferred 2008 and 2009:

Natural Resources and Conservation
?????????????????????????????????-
Doctorate Degrees: 585
Doctorate Degree-Research Scholarship: 208
Master???s Degrees: 4,802
Bachelor???s Degrees: 19,033
Associate???s Degrees: 2,388
Total 2008 and 2009: 27,016

Architecture and Related Services
?????????????????????????????????
Doctorate Degrees: 143
Doctorate Degree-Research Scholarship: 88
Master???s Degrees: 10,795
Bachelor???s Degrees: 19,267
Associate???s Degrees: 1,125
Total 2008 and 2009: 31,418

Communications Technologies/Technicians and Support Services
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Doctorate Degrees: 6
Doctorate Degree-Research Scholarship: 752
Master???s Degrees:
Bachelor???s Degrees: 9,760
Associate???s Degrees: 8,904
Total 2008 and 2009: 19,422

Computer and Information Sciences and Support Services
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Doctorate Degrees: 974
Doctorate Degree-Research Scholarship: 423
Master???s Degrees: 19,387
Bachelor???s Degrees: 73,795
Associate???s Degrees: 57,910
Total 2008 and 2009: 152,489

Engineering
????????????
Doctorate Degrees: 4,136
Doctorate Degree-Research Scholarship: 2,410
Master???s Degrees: 38,459
Bachelor???s Degrees: 131,645
Associate???s Degrees: 4,373
Total 2008 and 2009: 181,023

Engineering Technologies/Technicians
????????????????????????????????????
Doctorate Degrees: 54
Doctorate Degree-Research Scholarship: 7
Master???s Degrees: 4,444
Bachelor???s Degrees: 29,557
Associate???s Degrees: 60,724
Total 2008 and 2009: 94,786

Biological and Biomedical Sciences
?????????????????????????????????-
Doctorate Degrees: 6,979
Doctorate Degree-Research Scholarship: 2,800
Master???s Degrees: 16,305
Bachelor???s Degrees: 155,964
Associate???s Degrees: 4,482
Total 2008 and 2009: 186,530

Mathematics and Statistics
???????????????????????????
Doctorate Degrees: 1,001
Doctorate Degree-Research Scholarship: 456
Master???s Degrees: 6,349
Bachelor???s Degrees: 29,343
Associate???s Degrees: 1,698
Total 2008 and 2009: 38,847

Physical Sciences
??????????????????
Doctorate Degrees: 3,798
Doctorate Degree-Research Scholarship: 1,824
Master???s Degrees: 8,376
Bachelor???s Degrees: 42,710
Associate???s Degrees: 3,874
Total 2008 and 2009: 60,582

Science Technologies/Technicians
?????????????????????????????????
Doctorate Degrees: 5
Doctorate Degree-Research Scholarship:
Master???s Degrees: 45
Bachelor???s Degrees: 599
Associate???s Degrees: 2,817
Total 2008 and 2009: 3,466

Health Professions and Related Clinical Sciences
????????????????????????????????????????????????
Doctorate Degrees: 12,245
Doctorate Degree-Research Scholarship: 2,263
Master???s Degrees: 116,062
Bachelor???s Degrees: 230,794
Associate???s Degrees: 323,051
Total 2008 and 2009: 684,415

Total Degrees Conferred to US Citizens/Green Card Holders in STEM fields, 2008 and 2009
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Doctorate Degrees: 29,926
Doctorate Degree-Research Scholarship: 10,479
Master???s Degrees: 225,776
Bachelor???s Degrees: 742,467
Associate???s Degrees: 471,346
Total 2008 and 2009: 1,479,994

From the Foreign Labor Certification Annual Report, the occupations with more than 1000 Permanent (Residence) Labor Certifications, with the Office of Employment Statistics employment levels and Gain/Loss:

Computer Software Engineers, Applications
??????????????????????????????????????????
Number of Certifications: 9,854
OES Employment 2010: 499,280
OES Employment 2009: 495,500
Employment Gain/Loss: 3,780

Computer Systems Analysts
????????????????????????-
Number of Certifications: 5,695
OES Employment 2010: 495,800
OES Employment 2009: 512,720
Employment Gain/Loss: (16,920)

Computer Software Engineers,Systems Software
?????????????????????????????????????????????
Number of Certifications: 4,038
OES Employment 2010: 378,920
OES Employment 2009: 385,200
Employment Gain/Loss: (6,280)

Computer and Information Systems Managers
??????????????????????????????????????????
Number of Certifications: 1,893
OES Employment 2010: 288,660
OES Employment 2009: 287,210
Employment Gain/Loss: 1,450

Electronics Engineers,Except Computer
????????????????????????????????????-
Number of Certifications: 1,738
OES Employment 2010: 133,660
OES Employment 2009: 135,990
Employment Gain/Loss: (2,330)

Accountants and Auditors
????????????????????????
Number of Certifications: 1,595
OES Employment 2010: 1,072,490
OES Employment 2009: 1,106,980
Employment Gain/Loss: (34,490)

Computer Programmers
?????????????????????
Number of Certifications: 1,536
OES Employment 2010: 333,620
OES Employment 2009: 367,880
Employment Gain/Loss: (34,260)

Operations Research Analysts
???????????????????????????-
Number of Certifications: 1,432
OES Employment 2010: 62,210
OES Employment 2009: 60,960
Employment Gain/Loss: 1,250

Market Research Analysts
????????????????????????
Number of Certifications: 1,233
OES Employment 2010: Non Equiv. SOC
OES Employment 2009: Non Equiv. SOC
Employment Gain/Loss: N/A

Cooks, Restaurant
??????????????????
Number of Certifications: 1,115
OES Employment 2010: 901,310
OES Employment 2009: 898,820
Employment Gain/Loss: 2,490

Mechanical Engineers
?????????????????????
Number of Certifications: 1,074
OES Employment 2010: 234,400
OES Employment 2009: 232,660
Employment Gain/Loss: 1,740

Financial Analysts
??????????????????
Number of Certifications: 1,042
OES Employment 2010: 220,810
OES Employment 2009: 235,240
Employment Gain/Loss: (14,430)

Network and Computer Systems Administrators
??????????????????????????????????????????-
Number of Certifications: 1,034
OES Employment 2010: Non Equiv. SOC
OES Employment 2009: Non Equiv. SOC
Employment Gain/Loss: N/A

Electrical Engineers
?????????????????????
Number of Certifications: 1,003
OES Employment 2010: 148,770
OES Employment 2009: 151,660
Employment Gain/Loss: (2,890)

Total ??? OCCUPATIONS WITH MORE THAN 1,000 PERMANENT LABOR CERTIFICATIONS EMPLOYMENT GAIN/LOSS: (100,890)
Posted by PerturbedPundit
8th Mar 2012
-2 Votes
+ -
That is interesting.
For as impressive as those numbers seem, how come are there over a million unfilled technical jobs if so many qualified people are graduating?

The need is not being met which goes back to my point of schools pushing students into vague majors and away from the sciences.

I know a machine shop that has been looking for a machine operator for over a year. They cannot find anyone with the basic computer and drafting skills needed to read a blue print and enter information into the computer control system. The owners 15 year old home schooled daughter can operate it.
Posted by Hates Idiots
9th Mar 2012
0 Votes
+ -
STEM graduation rates
The President???s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST), an advisory group of the nation???s leading scientists and engineers appointed by the White House, recently estimated that fewer than 40% of students who enter college intending to major in a STEM field complete a STEM degree.
Posted by Joe McKendrick
11th Mar 2012
0 Votes
+ -
Wait A Minute...
@Joe McKendrick - Did you not see the part of the post that showed, even where employment levels showed a LOSS of jobs year over year, employers STILL obtained work visas - despite the graduation levels? Even within the "growth" occupations, in almost all cases, foreign labor applicants exceeded employment growth. Perhaps it's because of the bleak employment prospects in the STEM fields that these students move to a different major.
Posted by Perturbed-Pundit
Updated - 22nd Mar 2012
0 Votes
+ -
?
"...there over a million unfilled technical jobs..."

Citation, please.
Posted by Perturbed-Pundit
22nd Mar 2012
0 Votes
+ -
Try doing research yourself.
600,000 in computer tech fields alone.

Extend that discussion to all STEM fields, as done here, it is well over 1 million

http://www.watertowndailytimes.com/article/20120225/OPINION01/702259995/1036/opinion

But the problem is bigger than that. Skilled trades are suffering from the lack of a good basic education.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/44838614/Need_Work_US_Has_3_2_Million_Unfilled_Job_Openings

The problem is expected to get worse in just 6 years.

http://www.talkradionews.com/congress/2011/12/05/female-ceos-report-excess-of-tech-jobs.html

- - if current graduate trends continue, by 2018 there will be 1.4 million computing job openings in the United States and only 29 percent will be filled by US computing graduates. Excess jobs will be filled by foreigners imported to the United States. - -

I know 3 recent graduates who cannot understand why their Liberal Arts and Art History degrees have not helped them get good paying jobs. The one STEM student I know got a job making over $60,000 her first year. She will be making over $100,000 in 3 years if she sticks with this company.
Posted by Hates Idiots
Updated - 26th Mar 2012
0 Votes
+ -
STEM graduates
Thanks, PerturbedPundit -- these are good statistics. The rate of STEM graduates from US colleges does lag the rest of the world, however... A report from the National Science Board, revealed that about 4% of the world???s engineering degrees in 2010 went to US students, versus 34% to students in China, 5% to Japanese graduates, and 17% to the remaining Asian nations. Numerically, China graduated about 1 million scientists and engineers in 2008. For South Korea, Taiwan and Japan, the combined total was 330,000. In contrast, the US graduated 248,000 scientists and engineers during the same year.
Posted by Joe McKendrick
11th Mar 2012
0 Votes
+ -
Huh??
@Joe McKendrick - along with the graduation rates of STEM students, did you not see the part that showed the Office of Employment Statistics employment levels and gain/loss year over year?? Many (if not most) STEM employment levels DROPPED, while they were sponsoring more and more work visas. This despite the adequate number of U.S. citizen STEM graduates in the labor pool. Do you not see the discrepancy? In the aggregate we have lost about 100,000 jobs in these "shortage" occupations. Even within the "growth" occupations, in almost all cases, foreign labor applicants exceeded employment growth; this fact absolutely disproves the labor shortage thesis.
Posted by Perturbed-Pundit
Updated - 21st Mar 2012
0 Votes
+ -
So?
And even though the US graduated only 4% of the world's engineering degrees, employment levels in many of the STEM fields DROPPED year over year, despite the level of STEM graduates. Sounds to me that there is a glut of workers in the STEM fields.
Posted by Perturbed-Pundit
Updated - 22nd Mar 2012
0 Votes
+ -
It wasn't the educational establishment
First, the US is the only developed nation in the world without mandatory national educational standards. Every time such standards were proposed, whether by teacher's organizations or legislators, they were shouted down by people screaming about government over-reach and education being a local or state issue. Many of those same people are today complaining about low standards...

Second, education standards are enforced by the community, including the parents. Teachers get more calls from parents asking why their kids can't be exempted from the standards and allowed to pass then they get from parents thanking them for making their students learn.

Third, the anti-public school crowd has reaped what they've sown. Why should the kids pay attention in school when they all "know" that they won't get a good education there because every id10t with an agenda is screaming that the education system is failing?

Finally, the kids are going for the liberal arts degrees because they are easy. You don't have to encourage a human to take the easy way out.
Posted by NickNielsen
9th Mar 2012
-1 Votes
+ -
Check your facts.
The loudest opponents to effective and realistic standards ARE the teachers unions because any honest standards system requires the end of tenure and holding teachers accountable for poor performance.

It is interesting that the performance of our nations education system has dropped dramatically SINCE the creation and interference of the federal governments Department of Education.

Finally, kids are going for liberal arts degrees because they are easy. No argument there.

But if you listened to the Occupy mobs last year, a common complaint was, I have a liberal arts degree and I cannot get a job. The only problem with the Occupiers is they blamed the banks who loaned them the money to go to school.

Not the school that sold them a lie about getting a good job with ANY degree.

The EDUCATION CONNECTION ads still run on TV in Boston with that exact message.
Posted by Hates Idiots
Updated - 9th Mar 2012
0 Votes
+ -
I've been fascinated by the "occupy" crowd.
And you're right. You see very few engineers & chemists in that crowd. But what you do see is a lot of really incoherent ramblings from people who don't think well or clearly don't understand what they're taking about. These people probably would have been much better off in a trade school than in college.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
Updated - 9th Mar 2012
0 Votes
+ -
Yes & no
I believe we're talking different standards. I'm referring to curriculum standards, not teacher competency standards. On those, you are correct that the major obstruction has been the teachers unions.

Correlation is not causation. According to the researchers, our education system was going downhill in the 60s (see "Johnny Can't Read".) The Department of Educaion wasn't established until 15 years after that report.

Actually, it's not the schools selling them that lie, but society.
Posted by NickNielsen
9th Mar 2012
+1 Vote
+ -
So you concur...
...that the Department of Education has not helped to reverse that trend.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
9th Mar 2012
0 Votes
+ -
Any comprehesive plan has both.
You need curriculum standards and you need competency standards to make sure the teachers are sticking to the plan.

Teachers unions fight the curriculum standards for 2 reasons.

1. Because they want to teach easy BS classes instead of fact based classes. I firmly believe that THOSE WHO CAN'T, TEACH. I know many great teachers, but in an honest moment, usually over a few drinks, all of them will admit they feel a significant percentage of their peers should not be teaching a class to broom operators, let alone the future doctors, lawyers, policemen, CEO???s, politicians, etc of our nation.

2. In order to uphold those standards the teachers must face a comparable set of standards. As previously stated, I do not have must faith in too many of our teachers.

Can you imagine the chaos if it can out even 10 percent of the teachers in the US were incompetent by modest standards?
Posted by Hates Idiots
21st Mar 2012
0 Votes
+ -
Education = national competitiveness
NY Times' Tom Friedman just surfaced interesting data that shows resource-poor nations that emphasize education, such as Taiwan, have much stronger economies than resource-rich nations such as Kazakhstan or Algeria.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/11/opinion/sunday/friedman-pass-the-books-hold-the-oil.html
Posted by Joe McKendrick
11th Mar 2012
0 Votes
+ -
Huh?
Sorry @NickNielsen. Just silly.

In America, we've turned education into a state-dominated oligopoly that spends millions a year resisting change.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
9th Mar 2012
0 Votes
+ -
What these employers REALLY mean
"We have a shortage of skilled craftsmen and knowledge workers willing to continue working at wage levels, benefits, and working conditions historically associated with unskilled labor, a situation we've become accustomed to during the Great Recession. We don't like that the pendulum is finally swinging back toward the worker, so we want the federal government to import large numbers of easily-exploited foreigners to depress the wage market once again. We demand that the government protect our right to pay ourselves obscene salaries, bonuses, perks, stock options, and severance packages, while telling ourselves we're worth it (despite all evidence to the contrary)."
Posted by dmm99
9th Mar 2012
0 Votes
+ -
May be the wrong facts...
I read PerturbedPundits educational statistics post with interest, butt I have two observations. First is that lacking a comparisong of the number of jobs in each of thoses categories that are in search of a "skill," you can't unequivocally state that these numbers are adequate to supply the market. The second is that the skills listed don't seem to necessarily be those that the author was emphasizing, such as machine work and welding. All the engineers, computer scientists, marketers, accountants, etc., in the country are useless if there are no skilled tradespeople implement the science, research, and design work.
Posted by cstensrud2@...
9th Mar 2012
0 Votes
+ -
Another overlooked stat.
Most colleges and universities are guilty of gender bias in how they treat STEM graduates.

A 2010 study looking into the differences in pay for men and women STEM graduates 5 years after graduation found a disturbing trend.

Women on average earned almost 20 percent less than men. Before anyone goes off half cocked and cries about biased hiring practices they needed to read the rest of the study.

It seems as women got closer to graduation a majority of schools encouraged them into teaching. Which pays far less than applied science jobs in industry.

Making the pay chart look even worse is that men who went into teaching AFTER working in industry tended to get better paying jobs based on their job histories.

Bottom line. The very institutions who claim to be all about teaching fairness and equality are the driving force behind one of the largest gender pay gaps in our society.
Posted by Hates Idiots
12th Mar 2012
+1 Vote
+ -
Insourcing Jobs?
So now that the puppet masters have succeeded in reducing the wage/salary levels to just below the survival level, insuring their worthwhile profit levels, through automation, outsourcing, force reductions, benefit cutbacks, worker sacrifices, etc, etc, where are the workers who will accept their low paying, skill-requiring jobs? Is it time to push back, or shall we import workers from other countries, improving their lot in life, while still eroding away the middle class - the foundation of our culture - in America? Maybe by now we have earned God's blessings ("God Bless America".)
Posted by OjisanRuss
9th Mar 2012
0 Votes
+ -
Need for skilled craftsmen
What we have here is a need created by a number of factors: consumer desire for luxuries and complex technical equipment (ie: latest iPad, G4 phone, or Nikes!) requiring skills to create, assemble, and manufacture; poor teaching methods to train and inspire designers, assemblers, and builders; a troubling loss of pride in craftsmanship coupled with no desire to learn manual skills required (other than those needed for VIDEO games!); the expectation of starting with high-pay compensation for entry level work (explains why illegal laborers get hired, or jobs migrate to other countries); and U.S. workers expecting lengthy unemployment compensation even while refusing work paying a few cents less per hour than from the last job!
Posted by mogul264
9th Mar 2012
+2 Votes
+ -
Tech savvy workers
The way it used to work was: 1. You went to work for a manufacturer in some menial entry-level job. 2. You worked hard and intelligently, applied for and got selected for a more responsible job with the same manufacturer. 3. The manufacturer sent you to tech school, special on-the-job training, a company school or perhaps even to a college. Perhaps you were selected for an apprenticeship coordinated with a union. In return you agreed to work for them in your new, trained capacity for x number of years. They made money off you for at least x years, and it was quite likely that you'd work for them as a high-quality employee for many years after that. This system went to hell decades ago. Manufacturers outsourced overseas, cut and then eliminated training budgets, busted unions with enthusiastic right-wing political support, freely embraced mass layoffs of experienced, trained core employees upon corporate takeovers, hired the inexperienced and laid them off before they got enough knowledge to demand better wages, raided pensions and made abundently clear that loyalty to a company was misplaced. This was all in the name of profit to the point of obscenity - "We're a business, not a charity. We're responsible to our shareholders, not Society." Then these same arrogant, greedy fools demanded that our tax-supported and student-paid educational system do their training for them. Simply put, they can go to hell. My suggestion: Dear Sirs: You already know what to do. Train your own employees. Pay them well as they advance. Show some damned loyalty and gratitude and they will probably reciprocate. Understand that "lean and mean" means "anorexic, weak and foul-tempered." Increasing profits by twenty percent instead of seventeen percent is not worth killing your company, despite what the business school and consulting slicks tell you. Grow your own. It works.
Posted by father.nature@...
9th Mar 2012
0 Votes
+ -
These companies should invest in training.
I used to be the companies trained employees after they were hired, especially in manufacturing. Now they want people to go into debt to pay for their own training before their hired with no job guarantee at the end.

Now they wonder why people didn't?

This problem was solved 60 years ago.

Fall off the wallet.
Posted by shaunehunter
10th Mar 2012
0 Votes
+ -
Corporate training
Agreed, companies don't invest near enough in training and development. Their current workers are their greatest resource.
Posted by Joe McKendrick
11th Mar 2012
0 Votes
+ -
Training issues companies face today.
Companies used to do job specific training.

Now businesses have to be substitute high schools because most job applicants cannot read above an 8th grade level.

It is too expensive for them to make up for the short comings of our crappy education systems.
Posted by Hates Idiots
14th Mar 2012
+1 Vote
+ -
??
"most job applicants cannot read above an 8th grade level"

Citation, please.
Posted by Perturbed-Pundit
21st Mar 2012
0 Votes
+ -
First hand experience.
I did over 400 interviews for the last tech job I hired for and most applicants passed a Microsoft certification class, but could not write a cohesive sentence to save their life.

Excluding the technical jargon, most Microsoft manuals are written to a 6th grade reading level.
Posted by Hates Idiots
19th Apr 2012
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!