Follow this blog:
RSS

San Francisco to require cell phone radiation warning labels

By | June 16, 2010, 4:45 AM PDT

I have a confession to make. Sometimes, when I’m stuck at a red light, I check the email on my Apple iPhone. I know that’s a horrible, horrible thing, not to mention illegal. I challenge anyone reading this, however, to swear that they’ve never done the same thing with their own mobile gadget. Right. I thought so.

Yes, I do think that laws governing the use of distracting technology in cars is (sadly) necessary. Because you know sooner or later some clown is going to try to sue an automaker because they had an accident while trying to answer a call or punch an address into their GPS.

But a law declaring it mandatory for retailers and manufacturers to disclose exactly how much radiation your particular mobile phone puts out? Hmmmm.

That is exactly what the city by the bay, San Francisco, has done. On Tuesday, the council voted to pass a law requiring all retailers to disclose and display how much radiation particular cell phones emit.

This is actually something that IS tracked, so the information is available. But exactly how this data is presented isn’t all that consistent.

The law calls for the information to be displayed in type that at least 11 point type. (No hiding this in the fine print!) So, does that mean that anyone making a mobile phone has to create special packaging for San Francisco? Is there a special sticker? These ratings are tracked, so the information is available, but who is responsible? Unclear. Also, if the phone I want to buy emits less radiation per call than another phone does that mean it is safer?

Remember when stories about the dangers of using a mobile phone dominated headlines? No one really seems to know just how much damage they might cause, but San Francisco isn’t taking any chances.

Normally, I’m in San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsome’s camp on stuff like this. But personally, I think this law is a big bummer for retailers in the city because they will probably be the ones that have to pay to figure out the right labeling system.

Then again, it took us an awful long time to figure out that cigarettes were bad for us and for us to decide that we needed warning labels. Who’s to say that San Francisco isn’t simply being visionary?

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Heather Clancy

About Heather Clancy

Heather Clancy is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Heather Clancy

Heather Clancy

Contributing Editor, Business

Heather Clancy has written for United Press International, ZDNet, Entrepreneur, Fortune Small Business, the International Herald Tribune and the New York Times. She holds a degree from McGill University. She is based in New Jersey.

Follow her on Twitter.

Heather Clancy

Heather Clancy
Writing publicly about what the high-tech industry is actually doing to help itself and the world get greener or more sustainable is one way I figure I can contribute more meaningfully to said effort. I'm also a big OMG-kind-of-fan of smart leadership, which is why the goodly folks who publish this blog let me go on about this topic and why I am always on the hunt for forward-looking business management ideas.

My daily writing is focused on looking for topics for my blogs, GreenTech Pastures and Business Brains. I also write often about emerging technology trends such as mobile computing, unified communications and cloud computing. Occasionally, I will pop up at an industry conference in some sort of speaking capacity. In cases where a speaking engagement involves a sponsor that may be covered in this blog, that fact will be disclosed in coverage as appropriate.

My corporate writing work usually consists of crafting research white papers about some aspect of technology. In the event that my commentary (in written, audio or video form) mentions a company for which I have provided consulting advice, I will disclose that fact. However, there is no connection between these projects and the topics that I'm covering in my blog.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
3
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
RE: San Francisco to require cell phone radiation warning labels
Cell phones do not emit ionizing radiation!

Radio waves != radioactivity.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ionizing_radiation
Posted by jabster17
16th Jun 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: San Francisco to require cell phone radiation warning labels
Everyone does realize that the frequencies of radio waves which are used by cell phones have many of the same qualities as those frequencies of radio waves your microwave oven uses, right? And, among those qualities is the quality to cook food, or specifically meat! Although the power levels that phones emit are only a small fraction of the power levels used in microwave ovens, I would personally consider it nice to know the levels the phones are emitting. And, yes, those levels might influence my purchases of phones. One example would be, in the city with easy access to cell towers, why not go with the lowest possible emission levels and worry about my health. However, if I lived in a remote location I would have to accept higher levels and use a bluetooth device to keep the phone away. But yes, I think the cell makers should have the radiation levels available for their phones. If not a sticker right on the phone, then the phones documentation should contain these specifications. And, there should be standards in play, so one phone can be compared against another in a meaningful way. As, I would highly suspect that cell manufacturers would want to play games with these figures. But, figure it out for yourself. The cost of cell phone manufacturers to provide this data would amount to a penny or two per phone, so why are they so loath to provide the data? And, yes, I do know there are federal regulations which set allowable levels. Having been involved in industries utilizing various levels of radio frequencies in the microwave bands, I am also aware that these levels of radiation allowed are MUCH TOO HIGH, in my opinion. And, maybe cooking your head will cause cancer, maybe it won't, and once your head is cooked, maybe you won't care. ROFLOL
Posted by Winston Court
26th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: San Francisco to require cell phone radiation warning labels
On new microwave ovens, the rules say that no more than 1 milliwatt per sq. centimeter at 5 cm from the oven. On used microwaves, after a person has taken it home, no more than 5milliwatts per sq. cm can be emitted at 5 cm distance from the oven. I do believe most, if not all cell phones would pass these tests. Meters are available to measure this on microwaves. You should be able to purchase one at a RadioShack outlet in the USA.
Posted by Winston Court
26th Jul 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!