Follow this blog:
RSS

New space race is on: private versus private spacecraft

By | September 2, 2010, 2:44 PM PDT

In the 1960s, the space race was between the US and Soviet Union, both sponsoring massive multi-billion-dollar government programs to get humans into orbit and eventually to the moon, or at least out to space stations. Now, the race is on again, but this time, it’s between private, commercial ventures.

Compenhagen SubOrbitals test rocket, set for launch any day now.

Compenhagen Suborbitals' test rocket, being prepped for launch from a Baltic Sea platform. Launch is set for any day now.

My colleague here at SmartPlanet, Deborah Gage, just posted an interesting piece on the history of private versus public space exploration, channeling the thought-provoking observation by NASA economist Alexander MacDonald that in the long run, privately funded spaceflights are more the norm than an aberration.

Still, Deborah says, it’s important to maintain or increase public funding of space exploration, especially for the advancement of scientific research.

Agreed. But it’s really amazing to watch a whole new industry in private space travel unhatching, led by adventurers and entrepreneurs. We’ve talked about developments with the Virgin Galactic program here and here at the SmartPlanet site, and it appears Virgin will be leading the way with regularly scheduled suborbital space flights for the masses. (At least the masses who can pony up $200,000 per ticket.)

And, over in Denmark, another remarkable effort in private space flight is unfolding as well. According to a report in Discovery, a group of amateur rocket builders — the Copenhagen Suborbitals – plan to test their human space launch vehicle any day now from the Baltic Sea.  The possible launch date for their vehicle, dubbed HEAT-1X-Tycho Brahe, will be this Saturday, September 4th.

(UPDATE The September 4th launch was aborted due to a jammed liquid oxygen valve. The launch window lasts through September 17th, according to Copenhagen Suborbitals.)

For the first set of flight, crash dummies will be flown, but the spacecraft designers intend to send humans up into suborbital flights in 10 years. The economics are interesting as well: the group estimates they can build manned spacecraft at a cost of about $64,000.

By the way, this is no lightweight group of amateurs. One of the chief founders, Kristian von Bengtson, worked on NASA spacecraft through US contractors previously in his career.

The venture almost has an open source feel to it, as a nonprofit, volunteer-driven operation promising to test and develop a new generation of “micro-sized” spacecraft.  As Copenhagen Suborbital explains on its Website:

“Our mission is to launch a human being into space…. We are working fulltime to develop a series of suborbital space vehicles - designed to pave the way for manned space flight on a micro size spacecraft.”

According to Copenhagen, two rocket vehicles are under development. The first is a small unmanned sounding rocket, named Hybrid Atmospheric Test Vehicle or HATV; and a larger booster rocket named Hybrid Exo Atmospheric Transporter or HEAT, designed to carry a micro spacecraft into a suborbital trajectory in space. The HEAT micro spacecraft is scheduled for its first test in the Baltic this week.

(Photo credit: Copenhagen Suborbitals.)

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Joe McKendrick

About Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick

Contributing Editor, Business

Joe McKendrick is an independent analyst who tracks the impact of information technology on management and markets. He is the author of the SOA Manifesto and has written for Forbes, ZDNet and Database Trends & Applications. He holds a degree from Temple University. He is based in Pennsylvania.

Follow him on Twitter.

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick is an independent consultant and editor. Joe has performed project work for the following companies in the IT marketspace: IBM, Systinet/HP, Teradata. He has performed project work for the following organizations in partnership with Unisphere Research (Unisphere Media): IBM, Oracle Corp., International Oracle Users Group, Oracle Applications Users Group, Professional Association for SQL Server, International DB2 Users Group, International Sybase Users Group.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
7
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
RE: New space race is on: private versus private spacecraft
my biggest problem with this is that in theory the government funded program would benifit the whole country and inspires the world, whereas this wouldn't be about untilizing the best and brightest, but rather than richest and most unethical...

not that there is much difference between big government and big business, and most cases they are run by the exact same people, but at least in theory one benifits all of man-kind..

and the saddest thing of all is this is the pointless revival of a race that is irrelevent today, as we ALREADY have all the technology we need to get to the moon within months or even mars within 5 years (it only takes 18 months to get to mars now), we have all the technology we need to make a REAL space station, such as the ones invisioned by nazi germany and then the major powers of the world 20-25 years later, not a series to of science labs connected by tubes like a hamster cage... heck, we have the technology ot make extract oxygen from the moon's, ane even mars' surface, in theory we can colonize both with nothing more than technology we already have... the real question is why haven't we?, and why have our capabilities been downplayed to sell a future that was already acheivable 40-50 years ago, aside from the nastiness of the van allen belt's radition, but the faster our means or propulsion or the better our means of radioactive shielding the less of a problem the van allen belt becomes.
Posted by Daryl420
3rd Sep 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: New space race is on: private versus private spacecraft
The reason, Daryl420, is that there is a vast conspiracy to keep humanity grounded that includes Dems, Reps, Christian Dems, Social Dems, the US, EU, Russian & Chinese governments, most aerospace corps in the USA & Europe, the Vatican, and, of course, the most secretive, powerful, &n ruthless organization of all - the Girl Scouts. Buy those cookies at your peril.
Posted by hoodedswan
3rd Sep 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: New space race is on: private versus private spacecraft
i certianly accept that to an extent (though most people involved in all those political groups probably have little to no idea whats going on either,just like almost everyone else, are are being played and controlled politically just the same as the average person) aside from the girl scouts (LMAO) which must've been a joke, that or your entire post was sarcasm (in which case you should be sarcastic more often, as its pobably not far from the truth of the matter), though i also believe that at the same time the US (russian and more than likely other countries as well) has probably done alot more in space than we've been told, if for no other reason that the moon hold the key to nuclear fusion technology (helium-3) on earth using current nuclear fusion technology... its a stategic military position for space, esspecially if they really are actively trying to keep us out of space and potentionally off other worlds.

though it also seems to me that the countries like china, india, japan and russia actually are talking space seriously, and for several reasons, one being just a "grand" acheivement, another being the potentional to colonize otspace and even other worlds (moons and possibly minor planets included) another anothe major reason being space based solar power, and again all of the above countries have all three in their sights, esspecially china, india and japan, which have a much more dire need to solve such related problems... infact i tend to side with someone i heard on coast to coast am whom said something to the effect of by the time the US goes back to the moon (much less mars, or an astroid) the chinese will already be there to welcome the americans astronauts to the moon"... all of the above countires plan to go to the moon, if not beyond within 20 years, the US planned to go back by the same time but now experts estimate the quickest the US will be able to get back to the moon at the current rate of politics by 2030... by that time the chinese, japanese, russians and the indians will probably already be working on colonizing space.

another dumber thing is that will they are scrubbing both the current and future shuttle, yet at the same time they've had a 6 billion dollar increase in funding while laying off virtually anyone associated with strictly the manned space effort, and while at the same time they are scrubbing both shuttles they are rebuilding the launch pads despite they wont have anything to launch off their heavy lift launch pad; which is like an airport repaving its runways while its going out of business.

and hell i can think of several abstract reasons to go back to space,

1) would be to do a thorough researching of the moon, and phobos (mar's moon), both of which there is a body of evidence suggesting they are hollow, as even NASA has said both "ring like a bell" when struck by an asteroid or large space debris/junk. which would tend to imply thats its either artifial, meaning either aliean made it or ancieant humans did, or it was mined at some point in history... as gravity couldn't create a hollow object, meaning it should be impossible that it actually did form that way.

2) to find out if mars really ever did have advance life forms millions or even 2-3 billion years ago (we already kneo there is microbial life on mars.

3) to send a several (at least a dozen, if not a few dozen) human colonized versions of voyager, can just blast them out in a straight path, using all of our best propulsion technology in all different directions with no plan to return in person until they find something intresting enough to warrant stopping like artifacts of intelligent life on a planet whose civilization either died or left, or some other technology or item that would need to be brought back to earth for study, rather than just launching another mission to exactly that spot.

...and those are above and beyond the obvious reasons, like staving off overpopulation (which isn't yet a real threat aside from possibly india and japan, most countires simply haven't caught up with the demand of their populations, its not that their population in unsustainable), generating massive amount of energy off-planet, even growing food off-world (as they have in the international space station), finding deposits of rare earth minerals/gases/liquids, or naturally or artifically created alloys, or finding extra-terrestial intelligent life or geological or technological evidence thereof.

seems to me that going to space would be a no-brainer on all levels (aside have building or maintaining a global serf slave society... and it hard to imagine how the ruling elite would actually want to keep us here (despite some have expressed exactly that), since many of them actually have a burning desire to see the world's population reduced to anywhere from 2 billion (less than 30% of the total population) to as low as 50 million people (less than 1% of the current world population).
Posted by Daryl420
4th Sep 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: New space race is on: private versus private spacecraft
error in the second pargraph...

" all of the above countires plan to go to the moon, if not beyond within 20 years"

be imply they plan to go to the moon by 2020... not in 20 years.
Posted by Daryl420
4th Sep 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: New space race is on: private versus private spacecraft
Very confused by the headline of your story.
Posted by BobAyre
4th Sep 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: New space race is on: private versus private spacecraft
"'The meek shall inherit the Earth', the rest of us are going to the stars." - Marc Garneau.

Those who say "we don't need to do this" overlook almost all human endeavours. We didn't need to develop airplanes. We didn't need to develop the telephone. We didn't need to develop the home computer. There are many things we didn't need to do, but now that we've done them, the world is a very different place as a result, and many of us benefit from this.

We don't need to go to the moon, or mars, but if the private sector makes it possible to stay at the Orbital Hilton for a similar price as taking a vacation at the Hong Kong Hilton, we've made a huge leap forward in the economics of space flight.

Someday, the Sun will grow into a red giant and consume the Earth. If the works of Shakespeare, Lao Tzu, and many others are to survive, our decendants will need to leave this planet. We will need to settle other worlds. There is much to do before we can do that.

We must develop cost-effective space transportation. Government funded space transportation has never been cost effective. The only way to get cost effective space flight is though capatalistic competition, and that means, getting the private sector and entrepreneurs involved.

By the time a trip to the Obital Hilton costs as much as a trip to the Hong Kong Hilton, I'll likely be dead of old age. But to not look towards the future is to live in the past.
Posted by mheartwood
4th Sep 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: New space race is on: private versus private spacecraft
" The only way to get cost effective space flight is though capatalistic competition, and that means, getting the private sector and entrepreneurs involved."

not true... communist countries have no such problem... for that matter ANY government decently run will ALWAYS be more efficient than the private sector (just look at the old soviet union before their collapse; which was caused from constant wars from a certian capitalist country starting wars for money)... the private sector MUST operate at a profit... the government has no such restriction.... thats one of the major reason why a properly run public healthcare system is ALWAYS more cost effective than the private system, up to more than twice as efficent... this area is little different aside from the material tending to be restricted, further making it that much more expensive for anyone else (private sector) to do it. the only reason the private sector (of any given system/industry) is ever more efficent is when the government is completely incompetent, or when the public sector workers demand exorbant wage increases on a regular basis (rather than a steady increase based on the cost of living increases over time) to the point that the public sector becomes as inefficent as the private sector.

for that matter, if humanity is to get of the planet and not just the rich, then capitalism is the absolute last socio-economic system we want involved, the other two major socio-economic system while just as easy to corrupted as capitalism are actually designed to benifit the people as a whole, and not just the richest 1-5% of the country while everyone else gets screwed.. or as i call capitalism; expliotionism, as this is the primary characteristic of modern capitalism, and moreover i believe ti to be the inevitabl result of traditional, old school capitalism even under the best of intentions under its design... if people like me are to ever be able to leave the planet than we MUST socially evolve beyond our primative system of capitalism (and hopefuilly beyond modern socialism and communism, which along with capitalism are all varying degrees of the same thing... hence how the banking/insurance and otherwise the ruling elite are so able to control all 3 systems just as well.. because all monetary based socio-economic systems [esspecially fiat currency] can be equally controlled just the same) which by its nature enforces class struggle.
Posted by Daryl420
5th Sep 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!