Follow this blog:
RSS

Need talented staff? Just buy the entire company

By | September 13, 2012, 6:16 PM PDT

For decades, the standard practice in the technology industry has been for larger vendors to gobble up smaller vendors or startups. There were usually one of two reasons — either for the smaller company’s technology, or for their customer list.

Many times, employees of the smaller companies adapted well and flourished with their new organizations. There are cases, however, in which employees being gobbled up usually got the short end of the stick, and often either got laid off, or quit on their own accord after a brief stint in a new, often more controlling, corporate culture.

Now, it seems, the employees themselves are the target of acquisitions. The Wall Street Journal’s Sarah Needleman points to a recruiting technique some cash-rich tech giants use to get the tech talent they need: just buy a smaller company or startup and get its staff in the process.

The acquisitions — in which the smaller company itself is disbanded and staff is absorbed — are called “aqui-hires,” Needleman writes. She outlines some classic recent examples:

  • Facebook’s acquisition of Glancee, Threadsy, Spool and Lightbox.
  • Google’s acquisition of Milk.
  • LinkedIn’s acquisition of ChoiceVendor and mSpoke.
  • Twitter’s acqusition of RestEngine, HotSpots, and Clutch.lo,

Apparently, corporate acquisitions have become the latest human resources tool. The acquiring company gets a team of engineers who have already been working together. The catch is that the employees sought in the acqui-hires are the software engineers, while the remaining staff gets lost in the dust.

Of course, there’s the risk that this rather expensive recruiting tool may backfire. While the engineers interviewed in Needleman’s article appear happy in the cocoons of their new, larger employers, it could also breed discontent. The technology folks found at startups are there for the freewheeling entrepreneurial experience, not for a corporate 9-to-5 job.  But then again, this is a spirit that every organization could use a dose of.

(Thumbnail photo: U.S. Department of Commerce.)

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Joe McKendrick

About Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick

Contributing Editor, Business

Joe McKendrick is an independent analyst who tracks the impact of information technology on management and markets. He is the author of the SOA Manifesto and has written for Forbes, ZDNet and Database Trends & Applications. He holds a degree from Temple University. He is based in Pennsylvania.

Follow him on Twitter.

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick is an independent consultant and editor. Joe has performed project work for the following companies in the IT marketspace: IBM, Systinet/HP, Teradata. He has performed project work for the following organizations in partnership with Unisphere Research (Unisphere Media): IBM, Oracle Corp., International Oracle Users Group, Oracle Applications Users Group, Professional Association for SQL Server, International DB2 Users Group, International Sybase Users Group.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
3
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
what I found
when a larger company bought the one I was with, was that there were interviews for all, but they said 'don't bother with a resume' and the interviewers seemed to be digging around conversationally for various 'interesting' engineering and technical accomplishments rather than humdrum projects and corporate-style achievement of 'management by objectives' targets. There was a design ongoing at the time. A few months later, when the design had been completed and set in stone, the entire design team was simply dismissed. The field application engineers and marketing were kept.
Posted by opcom
14th Sep
0 Votes
+ -
It's happened to my company twice
The outfit I work for has been bought up that way twice. In both cases the only layoffs were on the business side of things. Engineering and production didn't lose anything.
Posted by riverat1
14th Sep
0 Votes
+ -
This strategy usually fails...
...if it's in a competitive industry and the purchasing company is poorly run; The talent they are trying to by is the first to jump ship.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
14th Sep
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!