Follow this blog:
RSS

Moore’s Law: no end in sight for processing power doubling

By | September 24, 2009, 7:48 AM PDT

The reason our society and economy have become so rapidly and thoroughly digitized in recent years is that the underlying computer processors have been able to keep up, and exceed, all the workloads we’ve thrown at them. It’s Moore’s Law in action. But will there be a point of diminishing growth in processing power?

In 1965, Gordon Moore, co-founder of Intel, postulated that that number of transistors that can be placed on an integrated circuit — and thus processing power — would double every two years.

The rest of the story is the stuff of computer industry legend. It turned out that Moore was right on the money, and the processing power of semiconductors keeps outpacing the workloads we put on them — from high-volume transaction processing to simulations to graphics. At the same time, the form factors that support these applications keep getting smaller and smaller.

But is there a physical limit to how many transistors a minuscule circuit can support? In recent years, however, observers have speculated that we may be near the end of Moore’s Law, at least as it applies to silicon-based processors.

Intel CTO Justin Rattner recently pooh-poohed such speculation, stating in an interview with Network World that Moore’s Law will likely be the rule for many decades to come. “If Moore’s Law is simply a measure of the increase in the number of electronic devices per chip, then Moore’s Law has much more time to go, probably decades,” he is quoted as saying. The future remains in silicon for a long time to come, he adds.

Still, new constructs of processor technology are emerging. For example, IBM announced last month that its scientists, in conjunction with CalTech, developed a method of using DNA molecules as scaffolding — where millions of carbon nanotubes could be deposited and self-assembled into precise patterns by sticking to the DNA molecules. This scaffolding may help enable processors to be etched into surfaces with less than 22 nanometers of space — the current physical barrier of space for cramming transistors on a circuit.

In the silicon world, Intel has already moved from a 45-nanometer construct to a 32-nanometer construct for its processors. The chipmaker also recently unveiled its own plans to crack the 22-nanometer barrier, announcing plans to release the 22-nanometer processors toward the end of 2011.

So, every year, we’ll be packing even more and more power on even tinier chips. Is it just a matter of time before we’re carrying around mainframes within our smartphones?

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Joe McKendrick

About Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick

Contributing Editor, Business

Joe McKendrick is an independent analyst who tracks the impact of information technology on management and markets. He is the author of the SOA Manifesto and has written for Forbes, ZDNet and Database Trends & Applications. He holds a degree from Temple University. He is based in Pennsylvania.

Follow him on Twitter.

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick is an independent consultant and editor. Joe has performed project work for the following companies in the IT marketspace: IBM, Systinet/HP, Teradata. He has performed project work for the following organizations in partnership with Unisphere Research (Unisphere Media): IBM, Oracle Corp., International Oracle Users Group, Oracle Applications Users Group, Professional Association for SQL Server, International DB2 Users Group, International Sybase Users Group.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
7
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Gee, sounds like my book
I have been saying this for years, and wrote a book in 2002 (The Blankenhorn Effect) predicting that, even though Gordon Moore himself was saying there were limits. I recently updated the book as Moore's Lore and I'm looking for an electronic publisher. But the prediction still holds. Good to see Intel coming around on it.
Posted by DanaBlankenhorn
24th Sep 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Moore's Law: no end in sight for processing power doubling
Though Moore's Law may hold for longer than expected, it does not mean
that computing power will expand at the same rate from the point of view of
the user. Too often the expanded capabilities of the computer are
absorbed in the ever increasing bloat of software. I have seen little
increase in the rate at which I can do work over the last five years and
others seem to have the same experience.
Posted by misceng
25th Sep 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Moore's Law: no end in sight for processing power doubling
Long live Moore's Law!
Posted by ITOdeed
25th Sep 2009
0 Votes
+ -
Moore's law could conceivably last forever...

as long as Intel and other think that they have to prove Moore's "law" correct.

When the chip can no longer be "stretched" to hold more "transistors" and/or more memory, all that's needed is to place two of those cpus/memory modules together and, presto, double the power in a computer. And then, a couple years later, all they need to do is to create a computer with four cpus and four memory modules on the same chip and... magic!.... the power of the computer has again doubled.

What? That's what they're doing now? How dare they cheat!
Posted by adornoe
25th Sep 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Moore's Law: no end in sight for processing power doubling
Although the number of transistors on a chip can increase indefinitely, the truth is that Moore's Law as commonly interpreted failed about five years ago. That is, the processing power of a single CPU stopped growing. The maximum single processor speed has not increased since then. Recent chips have increased the number of threads (simultaneous multiprocessing) or the number of cores but have not been able to increase the speed. This is for two reason: the heat dissipation of the chip; and the gate delay across the chip. The latter is the main problem. To make the CPU faster, the clock pulse has to be shorter (except in asynchronous CPUs, which we don't seem able to make). But the gate delay limits the number of transistors available for a clock pulse. There seems to be no way out of this problem.
Posted by jschlesinger@...
29th Sep 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Moore's Law: no end in sight for processing power doubling
?Is it just a matter of time before we?re carrying around mainframes within our smartphones??
Who wrote this? The smartphone is already many times more powerful than the first mainframes I worked on years ago that had 8kb to 32kb of memory! The only thing it cannot do is chew up boxes of continuous stationery. Regrettably it is also true that software bloat (and inherited software inefficiencies and bugs - e.g., Windows) means the gains are only 1000 times instead of 1,000,000 times. Human begins are very poor at learning from other people?s mistakes, and our capabilities do not double every 18 months.
Posted by yeoman
29th Sep 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Moore's Law: no end in sight for processing power doubling
Re: yeoman: "The smartphone is already many times more powerful than the first mainframes I worked on years ago that had 8kb to 32kb of memory!" Thanks for that clarification -- it just illustrates how far our capabilities have come!
Posted by Joe McKendrick
10th Oct 2009
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!