Follow this blog:
RSS

Food for thought: Tyson releases latest sustainability report

By | August 5, 2010, 12:33 PM PDT

As you might expect given its corporate mission, sustainability strategy for food production company Tyson Foods is tied closely to certain natural resources: mainly, carefully using the water that it needs to produce healthy chicken, beef and pork, and ensuring that renewable energy research and development won’t mess with its feedstock supply.

In fact, Tyson itself hopes to be a contributor to the biofuels arena. It has established a joint venture with Syntroleum called Dynamic Fuels, a facility that will convert inedible fats and greases into biofuels. According to the company’s latest sustainability report released this month, the first facility in Geismer, Louisiana, is supposed to begin production this year. That plant is supposed to produce up to 75 million gallons a year in renewable diesel fuels.

When it comes to water conservation, Tyson reports that it now uses about 14 percent less water to produce each pound of its finished product. It is pushing for another 10 percent reduction in its water usage over the next two years compared with levels supported at the end of its fiscal year 2008.

Another stated goal: “Support government policies that will encourage the use of non-food sources for renewable energy.”

Although Tyson apparently doesn’t spend a lot of time trumpeting its corporate sustainability programs (this is only its third annual report), it seems to me that sustainability underlies the management of its operations. Its subtle goal of ensuring that renewable energy research doesn’t interfere with food supplies is obviously self-interested, but its move to apply that policy to a venture in biofuels — one that makes use of waste in its supply chain — is the sort of innovative thinking that, for me, distinguishes smart sustainability strategy.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Heather Clancy

About Heather Clancy

Heather Clancy is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Heather Clancy

Heather Clancy

Contributing Editor

Heather Clancy has written for United Press International, ZDNet, Entrepreneur, Fortune Small Business, the International Herald Tribune and the New York Times. She holds a degree from McGill University. She is based in New Jersey.

Follow her on Twitter.

Heather Clancy

Heather Clancy

I am fascinated about how businesses of all sizes can transform their operations through technology -- not just to make themselves more efficient, but to rise above their competitors. That's the theme for my two ZDNet blogs, Small Business Matters and Next-Gen Partner. For SmartPlanet, I'm focused on profiling inspirational and controversial business leaders who have great leadership lessons to share. I also write regularly and passionately about corporate social responsibility and sustainability issues for GreenBiz.com.

Occasionally, I will pop up at an industry conference in some sort of speaking capacity. In cases where an engagement involves a sponsor that may be covered in this blog, that fact will be disclosed in coverage as appropriate.

My corporate writing work usually consists of crafting research white papers about some aspect of technology or moderating Webcasts. In the event that my commentary (in written, audio or video form) mentions a company for which I have provided consulting advice, I will disclose that fact. However, there is no connection between these projects and topics that I cover in my blogs.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
4
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Food for thought: Tyson releases latest sustainability report
For those unfamiliar with business, they are simply telling you that they are improving profits by minimizing or selling waste. They are acting in their own self-interest and has nothing to do with "saving the planet". They probably will report next year that they're working on making jewelry out of chicken beaks.

All these kinds of corporate report "spins" sound good to the Gore folks, though.
Posted by brain.trust
6th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Food for thought: Tyson releases latest sustainability report
I disagree with brain.trust completely. The fact that sustainability issues are good for the bottom line in many cases does not mean that the motives are purely profit driven. I work for Tyson Foods and our facility recently completed an initiative to become land-fill free. While we did look at the bottom line (of course) we are actually paying about $2000 a month more to send our waste to a local waste-to-energy converter. We decided to move forward because we are part of the community in which our families live and that our children and grandchildren will inherit. I am proud of the attitude that Tyson uses in these decision-making processes - in fact environmental stewardship is one of our company's core values.
Posted by mbattistoni@...
6th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Food for thought: Tyson releases latest sustainability report
Give me a break..."Tysons" and "sustainability" in the same sentence? Is Tysons still making it's contractors clip off the chickens beaks? Are they still using battery cages? Do they still lose 30 to 40% of their chickens before going to slaughter? Do they still stuff them full of antibiotic filled corn mash? Do they still fatten the chickens up so fast that their leg bones and skeletal structure can't support them? Do they still stuff a thousand or so hens in sunless, foul barns? What does turning chicken **** into energy have to do with making factory farmed chickens sustainable? Just asking!
Posted by RiverRancher
6th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Food for thought: Tyson releases latest sustainability report
RiverRancher, Even if any or all of that were true, something I can't speak to since I don't work in that part of the business, none of it has anything to do with sustainability. Your rant might be appropriate in a discussion of animal rights but that's not what we discussing is it?
Posted by mbattistoni@...
7th Aug 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!