Follow this blog:
RSS

Ernst & Young’s LED retrofit saves $1 million annually in electricity costs

By | August 7, 2012, 3:03 AM PDT

EDITOR’S NOTE: This story was updated Aug. 8, 2012, to include investment and payback information.

Professional services company Ernst & Young has replaced the lights at its 32-floor, 650,000-square-foot headquarters in New York’s Times Square with LED technology — saving $1 million a year in the process.

The retrofit is one of the largest LED lighting retrofits yet in New York City. It will cut Ernst & Young’s lighting-related energy and maintenance costs in half.

In response to reader questions, SmartPlanet requested payback and investment information for the project. After rebates, the retrofit cost Ernst & Young approximately $2 million, which was accounted for as a capital expenditure, according to a spokeswoman. That makes the payback period on the project approximately two years.

Roughly 25% of the energy used in commercial buildings comes from the lights, but Ernst & Young’s retrofit — which included occupancy sensors that control when lights are burning and when they’re not — cut the power consumption almost in in half to 2.9 million kilowatt-hours (kWHs) in electricity from 6.2 million kWhs previously.

“Reducing the carbon footprint of our office space is part of our firm-wide strategy to reduce our environmental footprint as our business grows,” said Leisha John, Ernst & Young’s Americas Director of Environmental Sustainability. “In fact, by the end of 2013, we plan to have a majority of our employees working in LEED and or Energy Star certified space. The completion of this lighting retrofit project in the New York office brings us one step closer to that goal, and will be part of that office’s Energy Star application.”

The firm hopes to have 50 percent of its employees working in LEED certified spaces by 2013.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Heather Clancy

About Heather Clancy

Heather Clancy is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Heather Clancy

Heather Clancy

Contributing Editor

Heather Clancy has written for United Press International, ZDNet, Entrepreneur, Fortune Small Business, the International Herald Tribune and the New York Times. She holds a degree from McGill University. She is based in New Jersey.

Follow her on Twitter.

Heather Clancy

Heather Clancy

I am fascinated about how businesses of all sizes can transform their operations through technology -- not just to make themselves more efficient, but to rise above their competitors. That's the theme for my two ZDNet blogs, Small Business Matters and Next-Gen Partner. For SmartPlanet, I'm focused on profiling inspirational and controversial business leaders who have great leadership lessons to share. I also write regularly and passionately about corporate social responsibility and sustainability issues for GreenBiz.com.

Occasionally, I will pop up at an industry conference in some sort of speaking capacity. In cases where an engagement involves a sponsor that may be covered in this blog, that fact will be disclosed in coverage as appropriate.

My corporate writing work usually consists of crafting research white papers about some aspect of technology or moderating Webcasts. In the event that my commentary (in written, audio or video form) mentions a company for which I have provided consulting advice, I will disclose that fact. However, there is no connection between these projects and topics that I cover in my blogs.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
6
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+2 Votes
+ -
What is the cost and time to recover cost?
THe total cost of the retrofit and how long it will take to pay back this cost is essential information. Without it this article is junk! They could have spent 100 times the savings which would have made this retrofit very stupid.
Posted by walterwood44
7th Aug
0 Votes
+ -
Cost and Time To Recover Are Necessary
I agree with your assessment. I read the title, and the first thing I did was scanned the article for cost. It means absolutely nothing that they are saving millions if they spent billions.
Posted by Patrick Aupperle
7th Aug
0 Votes
+ -
LED or just timers
This article leads with LED as part of the solution but it is obviously that timers controlling lights had a big effect. In the end we are left with no data about the cost and benefit of this solution. It is likely that timers with the same bulbs would have led to the same cost savings.
Posted by whoiskevin
7th Aug
+2 Votes
+ -
We will have to pay
Reducing CO2 will cost money, if anything, because the old ways are more developed. But not reducing CO2 will cost more money:
drought causes higher food prices
higher temperatures require more air conditioning
stronger storms cause more damage

Everyone has got to chip in. E&Y are trying. Don't knock them. Are you with us or against us?
Posted by johnkes
Updated - 7th Aug
+1 Vote
+ -
Thanks for weighing in
Just wanted to say that I appreciate ALL of these comments. I will be more diligent about collecting the cost information that you're talking about in the future. Normally I do, and I'll see if I can follow up to get that for you.

Appreciate all SmartPlanet readers.

Thanks, Heather
Posted by Heather Clancy
7th Aug
0 Votes
+ -
Cost information has been added to story
Just wanted to let all commenters know that cost and pay-back information has now been added to the story. Thanks for caring enough to ask and for holding me accountable!
Posted by Heather Clancy
8th Aug
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!