Follow this blog:
RSS

Digital economy an ‘illusion’? Facebook fallout debated

By | May 28, 2012, 6:00 AM PDT

Was the Facebook IPO debacle symptomatic of illusions of an Internet economy built on hyped-up promises?  Or was it simply a sub-chapter in the continuing story of our evolution to a digital economy?

In his latest column, New York Times columnist Ross Douthat argues that the dashed hopes of the Facebook stock offering represent a broader issue with the Internet economy itself. That technology is not delivering a new economy, but rather, a “hobbyist’s paradise,” quoting Slate’s Matthew Yglesias — “subsidized by surpluses from the old economy it was supposed to gradually replace.”

Douthat also cites statistics that show the technology sector is still but a small portion of the economy, and is suffering higher rates of unemployment than more traditional areas. Douthat says the digital economy simply isn’t a growth engine for the mainstream economy:

“The Internet is a wonder when it comes to generating ‘cheap fun.’ But because ’so many of its products are free,’ and because so much of a typical Web company’s work is “performed more or less automatically by the software and the servers,” the online world is rather less impressive when it comes to generating job growth.

“It’s telling, in this regard, that the companies most often cited as digital-era successes, Apple and Amazon, both have business models that are firmly rooted in the production and delivery of nonvirtual goods. Apple’s core competency is building better and more beautiful appliances; Amazon’s is delivering everything from appliances to DVDs to diapers more swiftly and cheaply to your door. By contrast, the more purely digital a company’s product, the fewer jobs it tends to create and the fewer dollars it can earn per user.”

A few thoughts on Douthat’s doubting:

First of all, the Internet is not “free.” An individual or company must purchase computers, and purchase connectivity and bandwidth from a provider for access.  As any telecom will tell you, the Internet is a big, big business. In fact, there are some estimates that households spend more money per month on network access than on food.

Technology encourages innovative new startups, or innovative new projects within established companies. True, digital companies do not hire any where near the amount of employees than traditional companies do. But, many of these startups and digital enterprises would not even exist if they had to hire workforces, with accompanying benefits and taxes. And these startups do fuel job growth indirectly — to contractors providing Website development, to the telecoms, of course, and to surrounding local economies.

With the rise of cloud computing and IT, we’re seeing more of a new breed of extremely lightweight company, unencumbered by capital investments, acting as a broker of services assembled from offerings drawn from or supported by third-party providers. Imagine the possibilities when this is combined with the emerging mobile “App Economy,” in which budding enterprises can be supported by micro-revenues streaming in from online app sales.

Cloud computing ultimately may be creating more jobs than it eliminates. Research conducted by IDC and sponsored by Microsoft Corp. concludes that cloud computing will potentially generate at least 14 million new jobs across the globe within the next three years. Moreover, these new jobs may likely be in many areas outside of IT. IDC points out that since jobs are being created as a result of increased business revenue from cloud, the jobs will be across the breadth of enterprises, in areas such as marketing, sales, finance and administration, production, and service. We may not have even imagined yet what job titles may emerge.

Cloud computing and IT are resulting in real, quantifiable savings. Consider the findings of a study from MeriTalk Cloud Computing Exchange (CCX), a community of Federal cloud leaders, on the potential savings the federal government could see. Federal agencies are now already saving about $5.5 billion annually with their cloud implementations, and it’s likely that this savings will rise to $12 billion as cloud efforts move forward. On average, the IT executives report a savings so far of at least 7% off their IT budgets for the next fiscal year.  Based on the 2013 IT budget of $78.9 billion, that’s about $5.5 billion in annual Federal savings, the study concludes.

The pure Internet companies may be over-valued and over-hyped, but information technology is changing the landscape of most non-IT companies. The Facebook IPO may have caused people to lose a lot of money, but the digital economy is much, much more than just Facebook and Twitter. It’s not just social media. It’s predictive analytics. It’s robotics. It’s 3D printing. And, as Nobel prize-winning economist Robert Solow once put it: “it has been the norm throughout the course of history for technology to throw people  out of work. But in the long run, employment keeps growing, and wages keep rising.” And, at a recent IBM-MIT confab, MIT’s Rodney Brooks made the observation that the rapid development of IT in North America is providing a competitive edge in the global economy: ” If we can build robotic tools that help people, we can get incredible productivity. The PC didn’t get rid of office workers; it made them do things differently. We have to do that with robots. We can take jobs back from China but they won’t be the same jobs. That doesn’t mean people have to be engineers to work. Instead of a factory worker doing a repetitive task, he can supervise a team of robots doing repetitive tasks.”

Finally, looking at it from a longer-term perspective, maybe the Facebook IPO wasn’t really so much of a debacle after all. It accomplished what it was supposed to do: raise capital for the company.

All in all, not too shabby for a hobbyist’s paradise.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Joe McKendrick

About Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick

Contributing Editor, Business

Joe McKendrick is an independent analyst who tracks the impact of information technology on management and markets. He is the author of the SOA Manifesto and has written for Forbes, ZDNet and Database Trends & Applications. He holds a degree from Temple University. He is based in Pennsylvania.

Follow him on Twitter.

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick is an independent consultant and editor. Joe has performed project work for the following companies in the IT marketspace: IBM, Systinet/HP, Teradata. He has performed project work for the following organizations in partnership with Unisphere Research (Unisphere Media): IBM, Oracle Corp., International Oracle Users Group, Oracle Applications Users Group, Professional Association for SQL Server, International DB2 Users Group, International Sybase Users Group.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
14
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Technology helps all startups in every arena.
Cloud computing means that every business is cheaply scalable and the cost of entry unimaginably inexpensive.

Even if just a pure internet company, there is value. Facebook as a means to get a message out, is quite useful if you have a business; same goes for Twitter.
Posted by gork platter
28th May 2012
+1 Vote
+ -
The way to judge usefulness is to charge for it
If as you say there is value in using Facebook to get a message out, then Facebook should be able to charge businesses for it. So far, they haven't.

This is a 8 year-old company, which means it should have a mature business model by now for generating revenue. They don't. In fact, about the only two ways the social media companies have generated significant revenue is via search advertising (Google) and games (Zynga).

Facebook could make $53 billion a year if it just charged its 900 million customers $5 per month. Xbox users gladly pony up that much for Xbox Gold. Facebook's home page says "It's free and always will be.", but perhaps that's just another way of saying people just don't think its worth paying for.
Posted by zackers
1st Jun 2012
0 Votes
+ -
Facebook IPO
The "failure" of the Facebook IPO seems much ado about nothing. Facebook represents perhaps one of the most overhyped IPOs in history. Facebook, after all,doesn't really do anything. It is a platform, to be sure, but a platform for people who whine a lot. Facebook is where people go to whine. Virtually nothing that Facebook offers isn't available in other places, especially but not exclusively on the Net. "Liking" something on Facebook is a colossal waste of a button push.
Posted by artful@...
29th May 2012
0 Votes
+ -
.com bust part 2.
People never learn.
Posted by Hates Idiots
29th May 2012
+7 Votes
+ -
Digital Economy a Failure?
Reminds me of Mark Twain's comment that notices of his death were a bit premature. Facebook is not the digital economy, nor even a significant portion thereof, despite the number of "users". It is an entertainment platform trying to sell adds to kids and folks trying to track the activity of kids and friends. It's lack-luster IPO is not a significant event.
Why? Because the digital economy is broader and more pervasive and growing faster than most of us stop to think about. It is a part of just about everything. I have written about three checks to pay bills in the last few months. Most of my business is conducted electronically, and much of my recreation is aided by it (computer aided drawing programs for woodworking projects, my training programs and results monitoring, purchasing, investment, and on. At that, I am a minor example as I am basically retired and not in the mainstream workforce. Shucks, we do not even have a working definition of the "digital economy."
Dead? Not even fully grown.
Posted by Trilogy
29th May 2012
+1 Vote
+ -
Death of the Digital Economy?
Really? Talk about HYPE!!! That's like predicting the end of civilization because your 2-week-old banana rotted -- get over it...
Posted by MAM@...
29th May 2012
0 Votes
+ -
HEY!
When you buy them crispy cruchy green, at about two weeks they are just getting worth while to eat.
Posted by zclayton3
29th May 2012
+2 Votes
+ -
Digiital Economy????
First of all get over the "Digital" worship thing.

Any economy is all about making stuff and getting stuff to the people who want it. If you want to eat and have a house and a car, and if you are not satisfied with digital versions of those, then you need more than a purely digital economy.

What the Digital Economy DOES do is allow some small number of people to provide things digitally that other people then might buy. If enough of them do buy, That allows the digital 'world' to survive. but, it can never be a complete economy by itself.

As to Facebook, the problem was that the price was set too high. People who bought at the 'initial price' lost money because they paid too much. The price is now sinking slowly to where the value really is. That's less than half the original asking price.

All of this came about because people like the bloggers and columnists here thought that there could ever be a Digital Economy separate from the Real Economy. There can't be.
Posted by YetAnotherBob
29th May 2012
+3 Votes
+ -
where is the failure?
I'm not sure that this Facebook IPO signals failure of internet or social media.

I think it signals the failure of the market exchanges. If we want to talk about business models changing/dying, we should be looking at the whole financiers, stock exchanges, deriviatives, and banking/finance industry.

The IPO seems to have done what it should do for Facebook - make it itself the most money. If the stock had gone up 10% or so the day AFTER the IPO, then that means that others (ie, financiers) are making money that COULD have been facebook's.

Everyone is upset because they themselves didnt make the money they planned on the 1st day after. but that is the way the stock market works, right? Or is supposed to work. The stock market is really - i mean "really" - just legalized gambling, just like a casino. You put some money in, sometimes you win more back, and sometimes you lose it.

People seem to be expecting these days that the stock market will always make you money, and if you lose money you can either file lawsuit (see the lawsuits already filed against Facebook and its IPO within the 1st week after), or that the government will come and indemnify you/bail you out (banks and brokerages, I'm talking about YOU!).

I think the whole stock exchange business is the model that is so 1800s, and should fall by the waysde. That the stock market became the tail that wagged the dog is telling, in so far as companies nowadays make decisions on cost-cutting and employee layoffs simply to satisfy the stock market while ignoring what its own business needs for its customers and employees are.
Posted by rivardau
29th May 2012
0 Votes
+ -
FaceBook?
As CNN called it, the FaceBook face plant is not indicative of anything IT failing, but rather the failure of Wall Street - yet again.
Posted by dduggerbiocepts
29th May 2012
+2 Votes
+ -
Reality
The "Digital" economy is just a subset of the service economy - an economy which is showing its weakness.

Providing services can be important, but in the end, goods are more so.

You can't eat an insurance policy. You can't drive creative secuirities.

By the same token you can't eat a social network. It might help you to get friends who will feed you, but. . .
Posted by CodeCurmudgeon
30th May 2012
+1 Vote
+ -
Reporting is more responsible than Facebook.
It used to be the case that reporters would witness events and then write a column or article that would let others know what happened. They were as faithful as possible to recounting the actual happenings though the article would be slanted one way or the other by the unavoidable transparency of the reporter???s vantage point. Today it seems that nearly every article is written by looking into a crystal ball and trying to predict the future of what will come from the short introduction that includes a highly skewed version of an event or story. Facebook has revenue based on advertising to their user base that did not largely change before or after the IPO. The records of previous income were available and the likelihood of future earnings could be estimated based on their business model and previous earnings. But, the value of the IPO was inflated by a seemingly endless barrage of articles that said that according to their crystal ball Facebook will perform a miracle and start making money faster than they ever have before. Now we have more crystal ball articles that predict the downfall of our society because Facebook didn???t do what they were supposed to, so obviously the sky is falling. The problem is the lack of accountability of the false prophets. Constantly waving arms and yelling ???wolf??? as the flock of sheepeople topple off the cliff. Then of course they are the first on the scene to report about the tragedy of how unsafe the cliff was and that no one had built railing to prevent such a fall. The false prophets are not just limited to the reporters. The prophets of Wall Street make billions of dollars using the same strategy. The prophets of politics rise to power with the same strategy. A very wealthy man once said that he could make money if he had enough of anything. Where America has had a decline in the actual products manufactured it has no shortage of those making profit from the manipulation of the masses.
Posted by james.graham@...
30th May 2012
0 Votes
+ -
Facebook built on a fad
Facebook is a fad. Fads grow because of their unsupported (temporary) popularity, but have so many drawbacks that they cannot sustain themselves. Once people have "experienced" the fad, they tire of it and move on to something else. Facebook has been expert in manipulating the faddist society to its own ends. As P.T. Barnham said, "there's a sucker born every minute!"
Posted by FreeloaderFred
30th May 2012
0 Votes
+ -
The Wicked are At It Again
Sounds Like Another Big Bank Money Scam The Wicked Are at it again

Will Facebook soon start to go under from another new rival soon to be. Facebook looking for suckers to lose their money or should i say give their money away to them, the wicked. Sounds like another Big Bank Scam. Selling to slow in the head investors soon to be a lot of Worthless Paper. Sounds like Facebook is not selling but are stealing all the money they can and a lot of it tax free.

The wise and smart will read the bible and get to know our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.

If someone really cares for giving out info, give them a Bible with red letter print. That is a red letter edition words that were spoken by are Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. With a Pray for them the lost maybe they will be saved, and not go to hell.

You want to make Money install Solar Energy. Why keep giving your money to others.

Pray your Name is in the Book Of Life not Facebook!

Facebook sells your info to the wicked!

The Lord's Little Helper
Paul Felix Schott
Posted by Paul Felix Schott
1st Jun 2012
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!