Follow this blog:
RSS

Climate research organization describes U.S. as ‘ecological debtor’

By | September 16, 2011, 6:41 AM PDT

Did you know that the United States consumes more than 207 percent of its “ecological” capacity? That’s a figure thrown out in a new report from international research organization Worldwatch Institute, which is pushing for the nation to not to abandon a path of innovation when it comes to environmental policy and renewable energy investment. The timing of the research publication is certainly very timely, given all the Monday morning quarterbacking going on about the spectacular failure of solar company Solyndra.

What does it mean to be an ecological debtor? In the simplest sense, it suggests that American consumers use more natural resources than are actually available in the country, geographically speaking. For comparison, the average U.S. citizen uses 11 times as many resources as the average Chinese citizen and 32 times as much as the average Kenyan.

On the Worldwatch Institute’s list of “global stewardship” practices, the United States scored a 38 out of possible 100.

The report reiterates what has become a common theme that is being voiced more often by groups like Worldwatch: the United States continues to abdicate any responsibility for its consumption habits when it comes to their perceived potential impact on the planet.

Worldwatch Institute Executive Director Robert Engelman noted:

“The United States once set the world standard in confronting its environmental problems — protecting wild lands, establishing an environmental protection agency, and acting assertively to limit pollution of all types. Americans benefited economically and in many other ways from these efforts. … We need a powerful citizens’ movement to help policymakers see that any efforts to make the United States enduringly prosperous are doomed to fail so long as we forget that we are living on a finite planet and cannot change the laws of physics and biology to suit our ambitions.”

It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see that this will be really hard feat to pull off, given the U.S. love of instant gratification. Despite protestations otherwise, our system favors and almost forces decisions that are in the interest of the short term and not long term view. When it comes to environmental policy or anything that smacks of cleantech innovation, the political climate could be described as indifferent at best, if not downright hostile.

The Solyndra mess certainly isn’t going to help, given the magnitude of the loss. I sure would love to hear more about our investments that HAVE paid off, wouldn’t you? Because I bet this one high-profile failure has been more than offset by dozens of smaller success stories that have paid off positively for U.S. taxpayers. We should all watch the Department of Energy’s SunShot program progress carefully.

In any event, the point of the Worldwatch report is to remind us, yet again, that our nation consumes more resources than it actually has available. It doesn’t suggest that U.S. consumers take a vow of non-consumption, but it does suggest that the nation needs to be more thoughtful about its habits. And that doing so will help, not hinder, our long-term economic and ecological prosperity.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Heather Clancy

About Heather Clancy

Heather Clancy is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Heather Clancy

Heather Clancy

Contributing Editor

Heather Clancy has written for United Press International, ZDNet, Entrepreneur, Fortune Small Business, the International Herald Tribune and the New York Times. She holds a degree from McGill University. She is based in New Jersey.

Follow her on Twitter.

Heather Clancy

Heather Clancy

I am fascinated about how businesses of all sizes can transform their operations through technology -- not just to make themselves more efficient, but to rise above their competitors. That's the theme for my two ZDNet blogs, Small Business Matters and Next-Gen Partner. For SmartPlanet, I'm focused on profiling inspirational and controversial business leaders who have great leadership lessons to share. I also write regularly and passionately about corporate social responsibility and sustainability issues for GreenBiz.com.

Occasionally, I will pop up at an industry conference in some sort of speaking capacity. In cases where an engagement involves a sponsor that may be covered in this blog, that fact will be disclosed in coverage as appropriate.

My corporate writing work usually consists of crafting research white papers about some aspect of technology or moderating Webcasts. In the event that my commentary (in written, audio or video form) mentions a company for which I have provided consulting advice, I will disclose that fact. However, there is no connection between these projects and topics that I cover in my blogs.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
10
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+5 Votes
+ -
Meaningless comparison
I'm a little perturbed at the concept that we only use 11 times as many resources as the average Chinese citizen and 32 times as much as the average Kenyan...considering their destitute mud hut nature. Plus I'd be willing to bet the other "fact" of using 201% of what is available, geographically speaking is a semantic ploy on the word "available". It's this kind of twisted guilt-oriented non-science that's holding back the green movement. I'm a big supporter of efficiency and ecology...no b.s. statistics or reports required....it makes sense all by itself.
Posted by BitwiseCGU
16th Sep 2011
-1 Votes
+ -
RE: Meaningless Comparison
What you said. It's exactly this kind of pap that turns people off and they figure it's ALL fluff (at best).
Posted by GregGold
16th Sep 2011
+3 Votes
+ -
Consumerism
The US has a culture of consumerism that gets people to buy cheap goods that wear out, break or fall out of fashion. We tend to buy things as disposable goods; some goods are useful but too expensive to bother repairing when they break down. Couple this with relentless need for sales to grow 5 to 10% and we have garbage dumps filled with things that are still in good condition but unwanted.

The movie "The Gods Must be Crazy" had a simple glass soda bottle casually tossed from a small plane and landing in a remote village. The villagers were hunter/gatherers and had never seen such an object that was useful for many things but it caused them to squabble over it. It was a funny movie but also thought provoking as well; the contrast between cultures was done well.
Posted by sboverie
16th Sep 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
The irony is...
...if Americans consumed (and produced) closer to that of the Kenyans, there'd be a whole lot less Kenyans. It has been our prosperity that has made the global population explosion possible, and our diminishing ability to sustain that prosperity that will make them starve.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
16th Sep 2011
+4 Votes
+ -
Just The Usual Drivel - Take No Notice
Relax, folks! It's just the usual complete drivel from people who are psychologically disposed towards making other people feel guilty for their successful lifestyles and superior political and economic systems.

Hobbling the successful economies is obviously NOT the way to help the basket case economies. Only democracy, property rights, the rule of law, inward investment and, above all, the freedom to be entrepreneurial, will help the citizens of the Third World to meet their aspirations to enjoy a lifestyle comparable to ours.

People who publish garbag like that are (in some cases unwitting) fellow travellers of all the dictators who prevent third world change from happening. The Arab Spring is just the latest event to try to break this log jam towards giving opressed people a better life. All power to the brave people who have made this happen in several Arab countries in the last few months. All those evil empires will in the end perish at the hands of their own people, just as the Soviet empire crumbled rapidly in the face of its own contradictions.

And when then they do crumble, the oh-so-goody goody enviros, greenies, climate alarmists, energy fetishists, and the rest, will hopefully just creep silently away, having nothing left to argue about and being required, at last, to get on and do something productive for their own country - a real job of work for example, like the rest of us..
Posted by cosserat@...
17th Sep 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
It doesn't take a guilt trip
"our system favors and almost forces decisions that are in the interest of the short term and not long term view"

Fear not, Ms. Clancy. Our system took care of that issue. Have you not heard of the Great Recession, the result our short term views? Capitalism is wonderful, once you understand it. Excesses self-correct automatically.

Much of the Marketwatch study is contradictory. For example, it cites that "the United States was a net importer of 67 non-fuel minerals and metals out of the 92 tracked by the U.S. Geological Survey." Some of those include the rare earth minerals needed to make solar cells, most of which come from China.

A lot of what makes the US "unsustainable" is our reliance on imported oil. But the US has huge untapped oil resources which we are not allowed to extract. Like it or not, for the next few decades we are going to burn oil. Just where that oil comes from makes no difference to the environment, but it does in Worldwatch's world view.

Worldwatch also says the US must "Curb population growth by focusing on immigration law and on reproductive health issues, particularly efforts to reduce unwanted pregnancies". The population of the US is only growing because of immigration. We can cut down immigration, but those people will still be born and probably live less enriched lives. In other words, poor people should be satisfied with their lot in life and not strive for a better life. Unwanted pregnancies are an important social issue, but they're not a very big population issue. That whole statement is very loaded.

Finally, a copy of "Creating Sustainable Prosperity in the United States: The Need for Innovation and Leadership" (Worldwatch Report #186) on which all this is based is not free. The cost of a hardcopy edition: $12.95. The cost of a downloadable PDF version: $12.95. This promotes "sustainability" how??????
Posted by zackers
18th Sep 2011
+2 Votes
+ -
This "US Population Growth" narrative keeps popping up...
...so I have to assume that it's part of the "repeat it endlessly" agenda of misinformation that these groups engage in. It also exposes them as simply untrustworthy.

If it were not for the (legal and illegal) immigration of mainly unaffluent peoples who tend to have larger families, America's population would be at most static, and most likely declining just as it is in the affluent western European countries. If the Progressives really wanted to stop the growth of America's population and consumption, they'd be for locking down the borders. Strangely, they are not.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
19th Sep 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
Are you really serious? Would you pay the price?
We could cut US petroleum use by 10% by stopping the use of artificial fertilizers on millions of acres of corn. Then we keep the remaining corn for ourselves and cease becoming an exporter of food. Millions world wide will starve.

That is a fact.
Posted by Hates Idiots
19th Sep 2011
0 Votes
+ -
Not a fact
Organic farming can get the same yields without synthetic fertilizer, it's just that the costs are higher. I would pay that price.
Posted by Greenknight_z
20th Sep 2011
+2 Votes
+ -
But will Kenyans pay?
There will also be an initial drop off in production for a few years until the depleted fertilizer dependent soil is naturally improved.

The other problem with organic farming methods is the growing opposition to it from abutters. 2 organic farms each operating in Massachusetts for over 100 years had to close in the past 10 years because new neighbors complained about the smell from composting and the noise other techniques created.

The heaviest restrictions in the proposed law are on organic farming methods. The want to make it even more cost prohibative. Congress and their campaign funders want people to think their food comes from sterile factories, not dirty farms.
Posted by Hates Idiots
Updated - 20th Sep 2011
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!