Follow this blog:
RSS

Bird with baguette 1; Big Bang 0

By | November 7, 2009, 7:19 AM PST

Call it the matchup between the Higgs boson and a bread crumb. And the bread crumb seems to have prevailed in this round.

The $6.5-billion Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in Switzerland — which is supposed to prove the existence of the Higgs boson, or “God particle,” which gives matter in the universe its mass and simulate the Big Bang — apparently was no match for a small bird with a bread crumb.

It seems the folks running the LHC had to postpone their plans last week to emulate the universe’s Big Bang because of a piece of baguette. According to a news report, LHC — “designed to recreate the conditions present at the beginning of time — had to be switched off after a bird dropped a bit of baguette into it, causing it to overheat.”

The bird allegedly dropped the bread crumb on a compensating capacitor – where the main electricity supply enters the collider – cutting power to the LHC during a test run.

Nice to see nature still knows how to keep us humble. The lesson is that even the most thoroughly and painstakingly laid plans — and grandest visions (in this case, uncovering the origin of the universe) — can be tripped up by the most unexpected and down-to-earth things. Then again, maybe more organizations could use birds with bread crumbs to make decision makers think twice about pouring money into mega-expensive black-hole projects.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Joe McKendrick

About Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick

Contributing Editor, Business

Joe McKendrick is an independent analyst who tracks the impact of information technology on management and markets. He is the author of the SOA Manifesto and has written for Forbes, ZDNet and Database Trends & Applications. He holds a degree from Temple University. He is based in Pennsylvania.

Follow him on Twitter.

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick is an independent consultant and editor. Joe has performed project work for the following companies in the IT marketspace: IBM, Systinet/HP, Teradata. He has performed project work for the following organizations in partnership with Unisphere Research (Unisphere Media): IBM, Oracle Corp., International Oracle Users Group, Oracle Applications Users Group, Professional Association for SQL Server, International DB2 Users Group, International Sybase Users Group.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
6
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Bird with baguette 1; Big Bang 0
Maybe they should just buy a shotgun instead.
Posted by Mabrick
9th Nov 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Bird with baguette 1; Big Bang 0
> pouring money into mega-expensive black-hole projects

Hey, stick to the "biz" stuff. You're clearly out of your depth when it comes to science.
Posted by abbiesomeone
9th Nov 2009
0 Votes
+ -
Out of depth?
@ abbiesomone
One does not need a pocket protector and a lab coat to decide whether spending billions of dollars on "proving" an esoterical question like "is there a God particle". It's like all the arguments about space exploration - are there benefits? Yes. Are they worth the money considering what that money might otherwise be used for? No. I liken it to someone buying a 100" wide-screen OLED TV, while their children run around in rag, eat out of garbage cans, and are sick all the time. Nothing wrong with the TV, everything wrong with the priorities.

It is true that we "need" to keep moving forward. But since we clearly haven't even got something as basic as looking after one another on a daily basis (food, clothing, housing, hope, security, job prospects and decent education), then farting about with theoretical stuff that MAY be useful for SOMETHING some time in the distant FUTURE is a waste of time, money and focus. All the technology in the world is useless if a society is in chaos (which on the whole the world-wide societies are)...
Posted by naibeeru
10th Nov 2009
0 Votes
+ -
Computer Science has it's "bug" now particle physics has it's ...
analogous malfunction.
Posted by donnydo77@...
10th Nov 2009
0 Votes
+ -
hyperbole is ineffectual when you don't know the details
@konkreet:
No, a pocket protector and lab coat are optional. Perspective is important. Yes, the cost for big, long-vision projects is large, but it is still a small cost in comparison with other budget items. Pure and natural sciences are foundation of developments 30 or 40 or more years afterward. Consider NASA's 2010 budget ($18.686 billion. Source: www.nasa.gov/news/budget/index.html). Huge. USA's 2010 budget request? 3.552 trillion (source: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/assets/fy2010_new_era/Summary_Tables2.pdf ). That's 3652 billion. Nasa represents 0.52606 981%. Is half a percent of your tax dollar too much?

Other programs to consider: Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid: $ 1438 billion (source: ibid).

I think you are right to want better results from social programs. Remember though, Medicare/Medicaid wouldn't have much success if medicines and medical technology were never funded. X-Rays didn't have many practical applications outside of pure science at first, as an example. It would have been hard to convince an investor back then to pony up $$ so that 100 years later we can print circuit boards using techniques adopted from that advance.

PalmPirate
Posted by gwaddell
16th Nov 2009
0 Votes
+ -
typo
Posted by gwaddell
16th Nov 2009
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!