Follow this blog:
RSS

Baby boomers retiring sooner than expected: study

By | April 3, 2012, 8:06 PM PDT

Baby boomers could never learn to sit still. They were the original rock-and-rollers and campus activists when they were younger, and later morphed into the success-obsessed Yuppies that re-shaped the economy. They were the tech pioneers that pushed the boundaries of computing into the mainstream of society.

Now, a new study out of MetLife suggests that they may actually be slowing down, and at a faster rate than previously expected. The study of 450 baby boomers born in 1946 finds they “are retiring in droves,” according to MetLife. (Baby boomers are defined as members of the generation born immediately after World War II, between the years 1946 and 1964. They comprise the largest demographic bulge to come out of the 20th century,)

The study reports that 59% of the first Boomers to turn 65 are at least partially retired — 45% are completely retired and 14% are retired, but working part-time. Of those still working, 37% say they’ll retire in the next year and on average plan to do so by the time they’re 68. The average retirement age for the 1946 Boomers is 59.7 for men and 57.2 for women.  The study is a follow-on of a report on the same 450 individuals MetLife published in 2007.

Half (51%) of those who are retired say they retired earlier than they had expected. Of those who retired early, four-in-ten say they did so for health reasons.

What does this mean?  Perhaps for a generation that prided itself on “dropping out” of the establishment, exiting the workforce is the latest act of rebellion. Perhaps its part of an ongoing search for meaning in life beyond the 9-to-5 routine. Perhaps they are making the move to post-retirement careers that they see as making more of a difference in the world, such as teaching, social work, or arts and music. Perhaps they’re joining the entrepreneurial wave and launching new businesses off the cloud. (Only 4% say they are “self-employed,” however.) One thing is certain: despite the recent rocky economy, the study’s subjects have enough wealth on hand that makes retirement possible.

Are the newly retired Yippees-turned-Yuppies-turned-Techies getting bored yet? Almost all (96%) retirees say they like retirement at least somewhat. Seven-in-ten (70%) like it a lot. Regarding the attitude of these respondents, the data shows that 43% of those polled are optimistic about the future. Of the 19% who are pessimistic about what’s ahead, 49% fault the government and 21% blame the economy.

What does this mean for business? A retiring workforce may mean skills going out the door faster than expected. For example, the average age of a mainframe programmer is 55. Ten years from now, there may be far fewer people that can run mainframes, which still process 80% of the world’s information. It means ramping up efforts to capture their knowledge, perhaps through collaborative social media. It means formulating new working arrangements that will enable older employees to stay on in more flexible, part-time, or telecommuting arrangements. It means devising training — designed interactively — that will bring members of Gen X and Gen Y up to speed faster.

Almost two-thirds, 63% of respondents, are already collecting Social Security benefits, and on average began doing so at the age of 63, defying the conventional wisdom that people would choose to wait to receive benefits until a later age in order to receive a higher payout.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Joe McKendrick

About Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick

Contributing Editor, Business

Joe McKendrick is an independent analyst who tracks the impact of information technology on management and markets. He is the author of the SOA Manifesto and has written for Forbes, ZDNet and Database Trends & Applications. He holds a degree from Temple University. He is based in Pennsylvania.

Follow him on Twitter.

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick is an independent consultant and editor. Joe has performed project work for the following companies in the IT marketspace: IBM, Systinet/HP, Teradata. He has performed project work for the following organizations in partnership with Unisphere Research (Unisphere Media): IBM, Oracle Corp., International Oracle Users Group, Oracle Applications Users Group, Professional Association for SQL Server, International DB2 Users Group, International Sybase Users Group.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
9
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+2 Votes
+ -
Incorrect conclusions, I believe.
Go look back at the study's highlights. There was a significant jump in early retirements between 2008 (19%) and 2011 (45%), which corresponds to people being laid off, using up their 99-week max unemployment benefits, then falling out of the workforce altogether.

They are not necessarily upset that they've had to retire, especially if their 401K / pensions were recalibrated for their age group and invested in mostly cash / bonds. Thus, they may have avoided the stock market plunge and it is likely many of them had already paid off their mortgages, making the drop in housing values less critical to them.

Take some time off, and see if you can't find a new hobby that may end up earning you income, right? Maybe write a book for all those young whipper snappers who think they know it all when they graduate from high school.
Posted by gork platter
3rd Apr 2012
0 Votes
+ -
Spot on gork.
I know dozens who went through what you described. Lost job, lost benefits, retired early.

Many are back to work part time either to supplement depleted 401ks or doing an odd job they always wanted to do like working in a flower shop arraigning flowers or fixing up old cars. Jobs they enjoy, but could never pay the bills with doing full time.
Posted by Hates Idiots
4th Apr 2012
0 Votes
+ -
Agreed.
I know more than a few people that when faced with downsizing or being laid-off, took the buyout and retired early. Most were not by choice, but you make the best you can. Most would have preferred to go on.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
4th Apr 2012
+1 Vote
+ -
We weren't all hippies
As a member of the boomer generation, not all of us dropped out or spent years trying to "find ourselves". This was mostly what college kids did, and most of our generation did not go to college.

A lot of social changes did hit our generation. Civil rights and women's liberation meant a lot of people were freed from traditional roles. People got out of bad marriages a lot quicker. But this didn't mean everybody suddenly decided to migrate to San Francisco and become hippies. If they went anywhere, it was a bit south to Silicon Valley. Most of the people in my high school graduating class from a working class town worked hard and tried to get ahead in life just like previous generations.

If anything, we found that we still had the same problems of raising kids, making mortgage payments, putting food on the table, getting older, and trying to enjoy life just as everybody else did.
Posted by zackers
Updated - 4th Apr 2012
+2 Votes
+ -
And contrary to media myth...
...not even most college kids did either. The whole '60s counter-culture thing was blown way out of proportion.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
5th Apr 2012
0 Votes
+ -
Agree the notion of hippies and radicals was hyped up....
But by 1970 we saw a sea change in which all institutions and conventions of society were challenged, which continues to this day.
Posted by Joe McKendrick
5th Apr 2012
+1 Vote
+ -
Some Boomer
While I was born in 46 I was not raised by my mother but by my Great Grandmother. Nothing could have been better than that! Boy did she spoil me and I spoiled her too when I grew up. But it meant that I grew up with an entirely different socialization than others my age. And even the kids I grew up with just shook their heads at the hippies which we called dippies. We went to college or on to trade schools or jobs, found our spouses, got married, raised families and yes, now we are retired. Most of the old neighborhood is active in church projects or civic projects and are plenty busy but working "for ourselves." Trust me, being retired is terrific!
Posted by IMWeira
4th Apr 2012
0 Votes
+ -
hippies? NO: Caretaker
I was too poor to be a hippie, and worked all my life, including when I was in college. But I retired early, because my husband had a stroke. How many more "retired" early for family reasons?
Posted by tioedong@...
6th Apr 2012
0 Votes
+ -
Also, do consider...
...that the modern concept of "retirement" where one stops working, but then continues to live an long, indefinite life of leisure is a relatively new concept. That's why Social Security is bankrupt, after all. Relatively few people lived long enough to "retire" and collect at 65. (At the time, the average life expectancy was 61) Now with life expediency into the 70s the math has not been adjusted to reflect the reality.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
6th Apr 2012
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!