Follow this blog:
RSS

Amtrak’s Acela turns 10; all eyes on new high-speed rail initiatives

By | December 24, 2010, 9:57 AM PST

High-speed rail has just observed its 10th year in the United States — in at least part of the country. Amtrak’s Acela high-speed train just celebrated its 10th birthday, and more high-speed initiatives are being contemplated for both the Northeast Corridor and across the country.

Amtrak Acela in Boston

10 years and running: Amtrak Acela in Boston. (Photo Credit: Wikipedia.)

In fiscal 2010, Amtrak reports, Acela trains carried more than 3.2 million passengers and earned $440 million in ticket revenue. On weekdays, an average of 80 percent of the seats are sold on the busiest segments, and trains regularly sell out during peak hours. In all, more than 25 million passengers have ridden on Acela since its first day of operation.

This week may see record-breaking ridership across the Amtrak system. a quasi-public passenger railroad formed in 1971. Amtrak reports it had a record-breaking Thanksgiving holiday travel week carrying 704,446 passengers, up 2.7 percent over last year. In addition, 134,230 passengers rode Amtrak on the Wednesday before Thanksgiving – itself a new record for the single busiest day in the history of the railroad. Acela ridership was up more than 13% from the previous year during the Thanksgiving travel period — from 55,000 to 62,400.

Amtrak has also unveiled a blueprint for new high-speed rail initiatives in the Northeast corridor in the years to come. (Covered in depth here by SmartPlanet’s Andrew Nusca.) In September, the railroad issued a roadmap that envisions trains operating up to 220 mph (354 kph) on a new two-track corridor resulting in a trip time of about three hours between Washington and Boston — cutting in half or better the current schedules.

At an average speed of 137 mph (220 kph), a trip between Washington and New York would take just 96 minutes, about one hour faster than today, Amtrak says. For the trip between New York and Boston, the average speed would be 148 mph (238 kph) and take just 84 minutes, or a time savings of more than two hours.

However, while Amtrak tries to look forward to a sleeker, high-speed future, many wonder how it’s going to keep its current creaky system going, which was cobbled together from the neglected ruins of private railroads on the verge of bankruptcy in the 1960s and 1970s.  Jim McClellan, a retired railroad executive and Federal Railroad Administration official who helped create Amtrak in the 1970s, is quoted in The Washington Post as calling Amtrak’s vision “highly unrealistic,” observing that “Amtrak has so many real-life problems today they need to be addressing, including repairs on an ancient system.”

Plus, Amtrak is competing for federal funds, of which $10 billion has already gone to support high-speed rail initiatives in California and Florida.

Still, the Amtrak concept plan, A Vision for High-Speed Rail in the Northeast Corridor (NEC), shows a financially viable route could be developed. Upon its full build-out in 2040, high-speed train ridership would approach 18 million passengers with room to accommodate up to 80 million annually as demand increases in the years and decades that follow. Departures of high-speed trains would expand from an average of one to four per hour in each direction, with additional service in the peak periods, and total daily high-speed rail departures would increase from 42 today to as many as 148 in 2040.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Joe McKendrick

About Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick

Contributing Editor, Business

Joe McKendrick is an independent analyst who tracks the impact of information technology on management and markets. He is the author of the SOA Manifesto and has written for Forbes, ZDNet and Database Trends & Applications. He holds a degree from Temple University. He is based in Pennsylvania.

Follow him on Twitter.

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick is an independent consultant and editor. Joe has performed project work for the following companies in the IT marketspace: IBM, Systinet/HP, Teradata. He has performed project work for the following organizations in partnership with Unisphere Research (Unisphere Media): IBM, Oracle Corp., International Oracle Users Group, Oracle Applications Users Group, Professional Association for SQL Server, International DB2 Users Group, International Sybase Users Group.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
4
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
What a joke. Using Acela as the nations goal in trains.
This is straight off Amtraks web site for tonights trains from Boston to New York. What good is a billion dollar train that saves you 18 minutes over a regular train?

Depart 5:20 pm Arrive 8:59 pm Direct
3 hr, 39 min Acela Express

Depart 6:48 pm Arrive 10:45 pm Direct
3 hr, 57 min Northeast Regional

These are not storm delay schedules. These are the everyday schedules.
Posted by Hates Idiots
27th Dec 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Amtrak's Acela turns 10; all eyes on new high-speed rail initiatives
High speed rail is a viable option in South Florida. Geographically, it is perfect, as South Florida is as flat as mat, so there would be no mountains to blow up and/or dig through, or any high peaks to mitigate with expensive bridges. Additionally, Most of the population lives, works and plays along an already established web of train lines that were set down from the late 1800's/early 1900's. So, why are we dragging on this? I hate to infuse politics into this comment, but c'est la vie. Conservatives have had the upper-hand in this state for, at least, a decade. Most Conservatives are anti-public/mass transit OF ANY KIND, and the rent-a-car lobby is big down here (because of the world-reknown theme parks in the Orlando/Kissimee area). That combination continues to hamper progress on moving forward with high-speed rail.

On a personal level. I have relatives in the Brevard County area, and I visit them at least four times per year. I would so rather board a train, and then rent a car once I arrive at a local station to visit them than to drive 332 miles (round trip) BY MYSELF.
Posted by citizen477
28th Dec 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
Great points.
If the rail is cost effective and timely, like rail used to be, you will see more businesses like car rentals and local buses, popup around them to support people such as your self.

Any point-to-point distance of 300 miles or more non-stop is worth a look at for high-speed rail. The problem is when you plan to add stops every 50 miles like California is proposing. The high-speed capabilities of the train are wasted on such short hops.

The problem with Acela is they bought the fancy 150 mph train and failed to restore the express rails. So it constantly competes for rail space with slower trains.

That is where the 18 minutes gained for a billion dollars of train is a colossal waste.

Most of the nations express rails were closed in the 1970s. They were either dismantled or have fallen into disrepair.
Posted by Hates Idiots
28th Dec 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
Another great example...
...of "press release journalism", which is to real "journalism" as
"crony capitalism" is to real "capitalism".
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
4th Jan 2011
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!