Follow this blog:
RSS

World health threat from antibiotic resistant bacteria

By | November 16, 2012, 3:16 AM PST

England's chief medical officer Dame Sally Davies says stop taking so many antibiotics.

There’s a new scourge right up there with global warming that is threatening the well-being of people across the planet: antibiotic resistant bacteria.

And like with global warming, we have ourselves to blame (okay, fire away below, those of you who do not think humans are heating up the helpless globe).

England’s chief medical officer, Prof Dame Sally Davies, has warned that our overuse of antibiotics is spawning resistant strains of bacteria at a staggering rate, the BBC reports.

“Antibiotics are losing their effectiveness at a rate that is both alarming and irreversible - similar to global warming,” Davies declares.

She and the country’s Health Protection Agency have appealed to the public to stop taking antibiotics for mild infections. Adding urgency, they noted that there are very few new antibiotics in development

Some people believe a glass of whisky soothes a sore throat.

“I urge patients and prescribers to think about the drugs they are requesting and dispensing,” Davies says. “Bacteria are adapting and finding ways to survive the effects of antibiotics, ultimately becoming resistant so they no longer work.”

And if you are taking antibiotics, remember to finish the prescribed dose, because not doing so fosters resistance, she points out.

Feel a sore throat coming on? Try tea and honey. That’s my advice, not hers. A Scottish friend of mine swears whisky does the trick.Do you have an antibiotic-free cure all? Tell us about it below.

Disclaimer: I am not a doctor.

Photos: Dame Sally Davies from Wikimedia/Flickr. Whisky from Brits At Their Best.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Mark Halper

About Mark Halper

Mark Halper is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Contributing Editor

Mark Halper has written for TIME, Fortune, Financial Times, the UK's Independent on Sunday, Forbes, New York Times, Wired, Variety and The Guardian. He is based in Bristol, U.K.

Follow him on Twitter.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Mark has no financial holdings in the companies he writes about. He occasionally travels at the expense of companies or their press relations agencies in order to report on a company or industry event related to it; Mark will prominently disclose this information when appropriate. This relationship will have no influence on his coverage. Companies he covers do not get to review columns in advance, or select or reject topics.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
16
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Essential oils...
Essential oils were used in biblical times throughout Europe and the middle east for fighting all kinds of different infections. Their natural compounds make them effective against resistant bacteria too. check it out here: http://www.essentialoilseeker.com/?p=51
Posted by Ricardohawk
16th Nov
0 Votes
+ -
Essential oils...
Doesn't matter if its Essential oils, antibiotics. whatever if just 0.0001% survive and reproduce in no time at all the desendents of the survivors will be immune
Posted by csumbler
16th Nov
0 Votes
+ -
Doctor's with no balls
Doctors need to grow a set, and stop prescribing anti-biotics like sweets for colds/flu etc. to any whiny patient.

Antibiotics work on Bacterial, not Viral infections. Period.
Posted by neil.postlethwaite@...
16th Nov
+2 Votes
+ -
It's a worldwide problem
In lots of countries, antibiotics are provided without a prescription or education. Add in the number of antibiotics routinely provided to livestock.
Posted by jtdavies
16th Nov
+4 Votes
+ -
Animal Husbandry
A major contributing factor to the spread of resistant drugs is the widespread use of antibiotics in the animal food industry. To maximize profit we feed drugs to animals as a preventative measure, "just in case". We have no one to blame but ourselves for this mess, and the bugs keep getting smarter and smarter faster than we can learn how to fight them off. And then there is swine flu and bird flu, both viral, and the antibiotics don't do a thing against them.

Being vegan, I do my small part not to contribute to the problem. The side benefit is that I rarely get sick, and when I do, my body seems to make the illness rather mild.
Posted by dcr100@...
16th Nov
0 Votes
+ -
Not just animals
dcr100 wrote "Being vegan, I do my small part not to contribute to the problem. The side benefit is that I rarely get sick, and when I do, my body seems to make the illness rather mild."

But anitbiotics are used on plant life, too. Back in the late 1970s I bought a pound of streptomycin to treat an apple tree suffering from fireblight, a bacterial infection. I sprayed the entire tree regularly and held the disease at bay until I ran out of streptomycin.

I bought it at the local pharmacy for $6.00 for the pound, no prescription needed.

Are you ready to give up apples?
Posted by lmarks@...
19th Nov
0 Votes
+ -
Organic
Not a problem. I grow my veggies veganic and buy my veggies organic. When possible I talk with the farmer.
Posted by dcr100@...
22nd Nov
0 Votes
+ -
FARMERS
I can remember medical student friends discussing this in the 60's. Spineless professional bodies, politicians and the farming lobby have increasing amounts of blood on their hands ...
Posted by jw@...
16th Nov
-3 Votes
+ -
whiskey and honey
is the old time family remedy, from my grandparents, who were farmers and ranchers as my cousins now are. If someone does not like FARMERS they should stop eating vegetables and fruits. If they do not like RANCHERS they should stop eating meat. If they hate ALL of those who make their life from the soil then they should never eat anything that is not heavily processed and had all the goodness sucked right out of it. They, in order to not be publicly-exposed hypocrites, should always eat only artificially produced "pasteurized process fortified simulated food product" with all the chemical vitamins in it. That way they can make sure not to support those hated, evil agrarians any more than necessary, as well as not being utter hypocrites. Don't complain with your mouth full.
Posted by opcom
Updated - 16th Nov
+1 Vote
+ -
You're missing their point
Many are frustrated with agribusiness because of their refusal to adopt better practices as they are developed. They intimidate farmers to by their over priced chemicals by convincing them they won't be profitable if they grow their crops and live stock naturally. If that doesn't work they attack them. Monsanto for example successfully sued a Saskatchewan farmer for not using their products.

We don't like it when people knowingly threaten the well being of everyone for their own profit.
Posted by shaunehunter
16th Nov
+1 Vote
+ -
The farmer won his case
I don't know what case you are referring to. The only case I found involved Percy Schmeiser of Saskatchewan, Canada (see http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/12/25/percy-schmeiser-farmer-who-beat-monsanto.aspx ). His fields were contaminated by pollen from outside his fields by Monsanto GM crops. Monsanto then sued him because he didn't license the GM crops from Monsanto.

He eventually won the lawsuit, although the courts there did say farmers don't have a right to use patent protected genes in their crops even when they are unwanted but inadvertently added from outside.

There is a real problem with GM crops is that the genes can spread to crops that are not licensed to have them. Patent law is not well-developed in this area because the patent can be unintentionally violated by farmers who would never want the genes in their crops in the first place. For example, it's not clear whether or not a grain elevator operator who buys grain with GM genes can't turn around and sell it as seeds to other farmers, even though the farmers themselves cannot.

Most farmers have to deal with Monsanto even when they don't use GM crops. Few farmers actually grown their own seeds, and Monsanto has a big market share in the market for non-GM seeds.
Posted by zackers
16th Nov
0 Votes
+ -
He may have won the lawsuit but he lost in the end.
Schmeiser was actually a rapeseed (canola) grower and had spent years developing his own line of seed that he sold to others. When Monsanto's GM pollen contaminated his crop it essentially ran him out of the seed business because he couldn't separate the contaminate from his original seed stock and intellectual property laws gave Monsanto the right to shut him down regardless of whether he intentionally used their IP or not. So several decades of work by Schmeiser developing his own line of rapeseed were down the drain.
Posted by riverat1
19th Nov
0 Votes
+ -
Livestock and pets
75% of the antibiotics are going to farm animals and pets. Think veterinarians and agribusiness. Hard to buy meat or processed food items with meat at the supermarket that the animal hasn't been fed antibiotics in their feed and for some animals hormones to increase production. Don't blame all the sick people, they were the reason most of these antibiotics were discovered in the first place.
Posted by daliere@...
16th Nov
0 Votes
+ -
Drug Resistant Bacteria and insects
Absolute proof of evolution in action. Survival of the fittest for all those creationists out there that deny evolution. Here is a prime example of exactly how evolution works. Kill off the weak and the stronger take over.
Posted by csumbler
16th Nov
+1 Vote
+ -
Survival of the fittest
Charles Darwin never said that, it was coined my Herbert Spencer for his race and class based theory of "Social Darwinism". Charles Darwin disagreed with is wholeheartedly.

Aside from that it does show evolution in action but don't shove it in the face of creationists because evolution has left them behind. They're failing to adapt.
Posted by shaunehunter
16th Nov
0 Votes
+ -
It's only part of a larger problem
Antibiotic resistance was recognized shortly after penicillin was developed. Disease has always ruled and now we see emergent and re-emergent diseases. Really it's only part of a bigger problem. Think of Eugenics. It's a big issue that points to a huge problem regardless of if it is considered morally unacceptable. It too is a part of that bigger problem (and there happens to be a morally acceptable alternative). The only way to understand either is to describe it as a change in ecology, then you can solve both problems and a number of others you aren't aware of yet. Now does anyone want to publish a book on it? Humanity must transition from the PastToTheFuture
Posted by a1swdeveloper
7th Feb
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!