Follow this blog:
RSS

Will academic publishing ever be free?

By | January 30, 2013, 1:07 PM PST

You’ve just come across the most amazing, groundbreaking study in your field. It could change everything. It could rewrite the textbooks. So you click through to the academic journal it’s published in to find out how the experiment was conducted. You salivate over the abstract and BAM, you’re smacked across the face with a paywall.

That’s the world of online academic publishing today. But will it stay that way? Not according to Tim Berners-Lee, the inventor of the World Wide Web. The Conversation reports:

“I think that the open access activists will win out,” said Sir Tim, speaking at the launch of the $40 million CSIRO’s Digital Productivity and Services Flagship on Tuesday.

“A lot of publishers realise that’s the way that is going. The unfortunate death of Aaron Swartz brought… that whole battle to many people’s attention,” he said, adding that an open access model gives the most benefit to the most people.

He also adds that opening up academic materials adds fairness to academia and makes the argument that because a lot of research is publicly funded it should be open to the public.

According to one study, reported by The Guardian, a high number of academic papers are already available through open access. Whether the rest of the academic publishing world will give up the millions they receive from academic institutions and individuals is yet to be seen. Do you think it will happen?

World wide web creator sees open access future for academic publishing [The Conversation]

Photo: Flickr/Alex E. Proimos

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Tyler Falk

About Tyler Falk

Tyler Falk is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Tyler Falk

Tyler Falk

Contributing Editor

Tyler Falk freelance journalist based in Washington, D.C. Previously, he was with Smart Growth America and Grist. He holds a degree from Goshen College.

Follow him on Twitter.

Tyler Falk

Tyler Falk

Tyler does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what he covers.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
5
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
They need funding from somewhere
Either the authors pay, or the readers pay, or a charitable institution pays, or some government pays. You can't do it properly for free. Having the authors pay runs the serious danger of turning the journal into a vanity press. Having the readers pay puts small and/or second-world institutions at a great disadvantage. And dependency on a single source of funding, either charitable or government, is unhealthy long-term. It would be unstable, and would allow the funder to push an agenda. IMO, a mix of the four would be best.
Posted by dmm99
31st Jan
0 Votes
+ -
Which is how many schools operate.
Do people honestly think the $20 a month they pay for access pays the bills to do the research?
Posted by Hates Idiots
31st Jan
+1 Vote
+ -
Research funder pays here in South Africa
Here our university research office pays page fees. These are more than made up by research subsidies from the government and granting bodies. Usually page fees allow open access, but there is alwas self-archiving as well, which I do, and now many universities are mandating. In some fields, like physics, by the time something is published in a journal it is very old hat. Some of my most cited papers have never been published in a journal.
Posted by ait10101
31st Jan
0 Votes
+ -
A ripoff of the taxpayers
As the article says, most research is funded in part or whole by the taxpayers. We have a right to see the papers published as a result without having to pay a third party. The data gathered from research should also be available to other researchers and even the public in a timely manner (though the raw data from most experiments is technical and massive and of little use to the public).

The reason journals hold such a lock on papers is because of the prestige factor. A paper published in Nature, Science, and other important journals is a big plus on any scientist's CV. As a condition of publication scientists gladly withhold their papers from any public website long after they have appeared in journals. The high cost of accessing these papers is often paid by the educational and research organizations the scientists are affiliated with, leaving the public out in the cold. If you aren't affiliated with one of these institutions, it can easily cost you $25 to $50 to download a copy of just one paper.

It doesn't have to be this way. Many researchers in the physical and mathematical sciences have long put "e-prints" of their papers on sites such as arXiv.org . They're not peer-reviewed and are often pre-prints, but they do give preliminary access of important results to other researchers and the public. It doesn't prevent these papers from being submitted to journals and undergoing the usual peer-reviewed process, which can take months or even years.
Posted by zackers
31st Jan
0 Votes
+ -
Most federally funded research programs work like that.
Look at the billions of atx dollars pumped into drug research.

Not one dime gets paid back, but the drug companies are allowed to earn huge profits off the research and they still claim the cost of researching the drug as a business expense on their taxes.

So drug research screws taxpayers multiple times.
Posted by Hates Idiots
1st Feb
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!