Follow this blog:
RSS

Why wind turbine blades could one day be made of vegetables

By | November 14, 2012, 9:12 PM PST

Wind turbines are the very symbol of clean energy. Not only do they actually use renewable energy, but they are also more photogenic than, say, solar panels or a geothermal plant.

But one thing most people aren’t aware of is that wind turbines do have a polluting side: When turbines stop functioning, the blades are pretty much near impossible to recycle — which is, literally, a big problem, because turbine blades can be as long as a football field and weigh 18 tons.

Just tossing out a Brobdingnagian broken blade like that is impossible. No landfill is big enough to take old blades. Most blades are disposed of by being cut or ground up and then incinerated or buried in landfills or roads. And this is a lot of work.

That’s where this big idea comes in: What if you made the turbines of different materials? What if, instead of carbon-fiber composites and petroleum-based products, you used biodegradable materials? Then you wouldn’t have to put in all the work to send the blades to a landfill.

To pursue this goal, the National Science Foundation (NSF) is giving $1.9 million to the University of Massachusetts’s mechanical engineer Christopher Niezrecki and the University of Wichita to find, as Fast Company puts it, “biological-derived materials for biodegradable blade materials that replace carbon-fiber composites and petroleum-based epoxies, the current industry standard.”

What seems likely is that some form of bio-based plastic made from soybean, linseed and other vegetable oils, plus cellulose fibers, could form the next generation of blades.

Whatever they come up with should help address a growing problem. By 2030, the U.S. will have about 170,000 wind turbines (20% of the country’s installed capacity), and that could mean up to 34,000 discarded blades every year. Globally, that figure could be as high as 170,000 by then.

Related on SmartPlanet:

via: Fast Company

photo: Ignacio Malapitan III/Wikimedia

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Laura Shin

About Laura Shin

Laura Shin is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Laura Shin

Laura Shin

Contributing Editor

Laura Shin has been published in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal and The Los Angeles Times, and is currently a contributor at Forbes. Previously, she worked at Newsweek, the New York Times, Wall Street Journal and LearnVest. She holds degrees from Stanford University and Columbia University's Graduate School of Journalism.

Follow her on Twitter.

Laura Shin

Laura Shin

In the unlikely event that Laura has a professional or financial relationship with a company she writes about, it will be prominently disclosed.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
6
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
The unrenewable part of renewable
That's a problem that hadn't occurred to me. Still, it's less problematical than nuclear waste.

Laura, I especially liked your use of the term, "Brobdingnagian". happy
Posted by LedLincoln
15th Nov
+2 Votes
+ -
Huh?
"Not only do they actually use renewable energy, but they are also more photogenic than, say, solar panels or a geothermal plant."

Tell that to the politically correct Kennedy family, friends and neighbors who've been fighting Cape Wind for over a decade. Pretty sure they'd disagree.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
15th Nov
0 Votes
+ -
What's the big deal in recycling them?
If these materials are so tough, why not simply cut the blades into short lengths, then grind them to typical aggregate sizes for use in asphalt or concrete paving?
Certainly this is no more effort than mining gravel, transporting, crushing & grading it for the same purpose, and certainly less harmful to the environment.
Posted by lodavesf
15th Nov
+1 Vote
+ -
There isn't a big deal.
Always follow the money:

"...the National Science Foundation (NSF) is giving $1.9 million to the University of Massachusettss mechanical engineer Christopher Niezrecki and the University of Wichita to find, as Fast Company puts it, biological-derived materials for biodegradable blade materials that replace carbon-fiber composites and petroleum-based epoxies, the current industry standard.

There's a fortune to be made in the crisis industrial complex.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
Updated - 15th Nov
0 Votes
+ -
Easier said than done
You can't just dump any old thing into concrete or asphalt and expect it to hold. Some aggregates will make a mix weaker. Remember when various DOTs tried adding ground-up tires to paving mixes? The roads ended up falling apart faster, and in some cases, catching fire. You also have the issue of cost-effectiveness. Transporting a giant blade to a rendering facility and grinding it costs money. I'm sure someone has looked into this already.
Posted by Dunkleosteus
19th Nov
+1 Vote
+ -
Biodegradable?
Why won't the biodegradable blades decompose while in service?
Posted by ndean
17th Nov
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!