Follow this blog:
RSS

Why is Apple working on wind turbine technology?

By | January 9, 2013, 12:44 AM PST

Filing a patent for a new energy storage and generation system, it seems Apple may be looking at new ways to add clean energy to its manufacturing processes.

First discovered by Apple Insider, an application filed with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in June 2011 details an alternative wind turbine design that generates electricity from converting heat energy instead of rotational energy made possible by the movement of blades.

In standard turbine design, wind energy is used to turn the unit’s rotors, which then converts this type of power into electricity through powering machinery or sending it to generators. However, Apple’s patent design takes this one step further, and accounts for a problem faced by any system reliant on wind energy — the natural element’s variability.

Described as the “on-demand generation of electricity from stored wind energy,” the patent application details a mechanism in which rotational energy created by the turbine is used to generate heat, which is then stored in “low heat capacity” fluid. This energy is then transferred into a working fluid which creates steam, which replaces electricity in order to power mechanisms or generators.

As the energy is being stored, heat can be selectively transferred whenever there is a lull in wind activity, keeping machinery going and reducing reliance on back-up power systems.

Apple describes the benefits of the system within the patent application, where the firm says such designs could reduce costs related to wind variation:

The variable nature of wind may interfere with on-demand generation of electricity from wind energy. For example, fluctuations in wind speed may hamper the adequate production of electricity from wind power during periods of peak demand, or conversely, may produce excess electrical power during periods of low demand. In turn, such variability may limit the ability to incorporate large amounts of wind power into a grid system.

How might this kind of technology relate to iPad and iPhone maker Apple? The patent application is not a huge indicator, but as the firm is using clean energy in North Carolina — where it plans to build a 20-megawatt solar farm covering 100 acres — it may be that the company is keen to add additional, renewable energy sources to power its manufacturing chain.

Image credit: Apple Insider

Related:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Charlie Osborne

About Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne

Contributing Editor

Charlie Osborne is a freelance journalist and graphic designer based in London. In addition to SmartPlanet, she also writes the iGeneration column for business technology website ZDNet. She holds degrees in medical anthropology from the University of Kent.

Follow her on Twitter.

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
9
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
on-shore use only
This seems like a great idea and looks like it will work with on-shore wind turbines. I don't see is use off shore as most wind farms are now being developed off shore.in places like the UK, Belgium and Germany. I say go for it, even though my personal preference is LFTR technology because it is more efficient and practical for industry.
Posted by kralspaces
9th Jan
0 Votes
+ -
Interesting Concept
Just got me thinking, has anyone thought about hooking up a flywheel to a wind turbine? It seems like a similar concept. I've never seen it but it seems to make sense theoretically.
Posted by victortweed
9th Jan
0 Votes
+ -
Of course it has, and by smarter people than myself...
I thought about it a lot. I wanted to make my own VAWT, (Vertical Axis Wind Turbine,) but I live in a row home, and unless you can put it on a decently high pole, it isn't worth the effort. Yeah, I thought about these things a lot, and came to the conclusion, I don't know enough!

A flywheel would have to be a huge and heavy to store any significant amount of energy. That has its own range of problems and potential inefficiencies. Not to mention danger!

Now, if the flywheel is used to turn a generator, as the energy is used, the flywheel slows down. How do you keep producing a steady amount of electricity from a power source that is slowing down? Maybe some kind of variable transmission system, but I couldn't even begin to design that. I thought about instead of using the torque from the axis to power the generator, applying a wheel to the face of the flywheel, (Think like a record player with a guy on a unicycle sitting on one spot on the record. [Do you remember what a record player is?]) You would start with the rider towards the center of the flywheel, and as the flywheel slows down, the rider would move outward so more flywheel passes beneath the rider wheel with each rotation. Theoretically, this would keep the generator RPMs constant, at least until the flywheel falls below a critical minimum point. Also, I imagine this could be used to adjust for fluctuations in demand or wind speed by moving the rider in and out.

In my design, there would be so much energy lost to friction and the complexity of moving parts, the wind turbine would have to be putting out a reasonably high output to keep the flywheel going. If the wind turbine is already doing that well, do we really need the flywheel storage system at all? (Not to mention the maintenance of wheels, bearings. etc... That would also be pretty harsh.)

I am smart enough to make a windmill, powering a generator of some kind, and connecting it to a battery system of some kind, because all the really hard engineering has been done by people before me, (an efficient battery is no small thing! Have you thought about making your own battery with a few 5 gallon buckets, some lead, and battery acid? [shudder...]) For all my musings, I don't think I could make this work, at least not nearly as efficiently as a simple battery would. Maybe in some crude Fred Flintstone way, but not in a practical way.

It is a good thing there are smarter people than me working on these things! Nice chatting with you.
Posted by michaellashinsky@...
15th Jan
+1 Vote
+ -
Power Storage the Key Issue for Future Power
It has been the chief problem of power generation that of "peak" demand. Wind fails because when the wind stops blowing the grid can't easily adjust. Fossil fuel plants generate continuously to meet peak demand and waste the excess of non-peak demand. I heard about a vanadium colloidal battery that was as large as a building. Using refrigerant like liquids to force a boil out of latent heat seems like real genius. Find the the way to use what everyone else is wasting and you will become rich. This is why Apple is there. The whole future of technology rests on the fact that technology needs energy to survive.
The greatest advantage of this is that the generator need not be designed to generate 60 Hz AC which is a major limitation because the windmill has to shut down when wind speeds are high. Redesigning the generator as an induction breaking system that powers an induction heating element may allow that shut-down waste to be captured as well.
Posted by Drake411
Updated - 9th Jan
0 Votes
+ -
Apple 'patent'
This 'patent' illustrates how using a laser pointer to amuse cats was easily slipped by our illustrious PAtent Office.

How many here remember in grade school science how James Watt measured energy by stirring a tank of water? Apparently neither Apple staff nor Patent Office staff do.

This is how dumb we are today.
Posted by DrAlexC
9th Jan
+1 Vote
+ -
handwaving at work
If a wind turbine turns mechanical energy directly into heat energy and later turns the heat back into electricity, only 1/3 of the energy comes out and that is with high grade heat. That is obvious because every means ever devised to turn heat into electricity is inefficient and it gets worse as the heat temperature gets lower, simple Carnot law at work. The drawing doesn't make it clear that to extract the mechanical energy back from the steam, the steam must return the heat to a cold sink. Clearly Apple forget to mention the Carnot limit takes away 2/3 of the energy or perhaps they don't even know this.

Even if you use other means to store electrical energy as in a battery, flywheel, water pumping, heat pumping, etc there are losses. The best I can think of might be Isentropic (Ltd) pumped heat storage, with upto 80% round trip efficiency, most are worse.

If Apple had any knowledge of power engineering, they would ask for nuclear power, but that would shock their customer base, so they do what they think their customers think they should do.

Apple should stick to patenting handwaving gestures because that is all this is.

see "LLNL energy graph" to see how the US and other countries use energy
Posted by energy_guy
9th Jan
-1 Votes
+ -
Agreed
This is a PR stunt to renew their "green" street cred. Nothing more.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
10th Jan
-2 Votes
+ -
*Gasp* OMG!!! Say it isn't so!!!
Apple may know something that everyone else doesn't know???

Say it isn't so energy_guy!!!

What are they thinking not giving away the secret with the patent they filed?

How dare they try to confuse the pea brained buffoons of the world!!! Don't they know there are laws to prevent this sort of thing from happening?!?! I say we arrest them for violating Carnot's law and we lock them up and throw away the key!!! How dare they try to make the world a better place!!!

We don't need no stinking "Innovation"!!! Apple doesn't know anything about innovation!!! Those jerks came along and wrecked everything!!! I used to be forced to buy music on CD and if I pirated it, it was very poor quality and Apple came along and made it less expensive and better and easier to get to, and they messed it all up... My flip phone used to be kewl and thin and now I gotta lug around a 12 pound wannabe Roid phone everywhere I go!!! Those jerks at Apple made computers more intuitive and user friendly and now I can't charge people $150.00/hour to fix their PCs... And now I get all butt-hurt when I got a device that doesn't pinch zoom and swipe and all that darn gesturing nonsense that Apple gave us... And sure it all makes so much sense in hindsight and we never would have gone there unless Apple came along, but that's all a moot point... I say Apple is trying to rule the universe and that they are evil because I am an Apple hater and Apple makes me look like a fool every time they turn around and release something new. Curse you Apple!!!!!

On a more serious note... Do you actually read any of the drivel you write energy_gay?
Posted by i8thecat4
11th Jan
0 Votes
+ -
wind nonsense
Each minute an inventor is born.
Posted by praoss
10th Jan
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!