Follow this blog:
RSS

What’s missing from STEM education

By | November 24, 2012, 9:46 AM PST

Worth quoting:

“I think there is something missing from our high school though post secondary STEM [science, technology, education, math] programs. Something that would better prepare our students for the competitive global economy. I think they also need to be equipped with the skills that can bring it all together for them–entrepreneurship. So lets reboot it, and for those of you who look for the next acronym, we can call it STEEM. STEEM: Science, Technology, Engineering, Entrepreneurship and Math. With innovative entrepreneurial curriculum in the mix, we can get to work on developing the best equipped generation to help lead the next phase of growth of our innovation economy.”

- Dean DeBiase, chairman and CEO of entertainment.com, co-founder of boardroominnovation.com and Innovation Excellence, and a co-author of The Big Moo.

JM: Given the nature of our hypercompetitive global economy and the lack of incentive, opportunities and innovation in the moribund wage-and-salary system, it makes sense to introduce a more expansive Silicon Valley mindset early and often. And STEEM makes STEM a whole lot more interesting to more students.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Joe McKendrick

About Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick

Contributing Editor

Joe McKendrick is an independent analyst who tracks the impact of information technology on management and markets. He is the author of the SOA Manifesto and has written for Forbes, ZDNet and Database Trends & Applications. He holds a degree from Temple University. He is based in Pennsylvania.

Follow him on Twitter.

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick is an independent consultant and editor. Joe has performed project work for the following companies in the IT marketspace: IBM, Systinet/HP, Teradata. He has performed project work for the following organizations in partnership with Unisphere Research (Unisphere Media): IBM, Oracle Corp., International Oracle Users Group, Oracle Applications Users Group, Professional Association for SQL Server, International DB2 Users Group, International Sybase Users Group.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
9
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+3 Votes
+ -
MISSING THE WHOLE POINT!
One of the whole points of the STEM "movement" is that too many intangible subjects have detracted from our students' abilities to master (and excel) at basic, practical skills. Particularly in today's highly-specialized, advanced global economy, concrete skills and a basic level of expertise are often found missing, which is why technicians and specialists in certain STEM fields are highly paid (even though they may lack the watered-down university education they could themselves have paid highly for).

STEM education provides a tangible foundation of basics to be built upon. Entrepreneurship can indeed be fostered in those that show talent, but we should not (again) lose focus on the technical aspects of education. If the proposed "STEEM" acronym were on a test, and you had to "choose the one that doesn't fit the set," I think it's obvious which one it would be.

The concept of STEM education is to regain balance in a liberal arts education that has drifted way too far into the conceptual worlds of "art," which is why we have too many lawyers and not enough scientists/researchers, too many communications degrees with too few electrical engineers. The kind of "mission creep" described above will just re-set the current problem.

Let's recognize that, unlike the STEM fields, "innovation," and "entrepreneurship," while inspiring buzzwords, cannot even be easily defined (besides, "you know it when you see it"). In spite of that, I'm sure Mr. DeBiase has developed a great curriculum to sell us.

Would it really be "smart" to buy it?
Posted by lazarusrook
26th Nov
0 Votes
+ -
What is missing?
As in most aspects of any initiative what is missing is self-leadership. The ability to lead one's self is so critical and yet is hardly ever discussed. Employers for the last 20 plus years have continually asked for leadership development especially those soft skills, people skills that are required and probably now even more than ever before in the workplace. The challenge is when teachers lack self leadership skills how can they teach those to students?

Leanne Hoagland-Smith
Posted by Coach-Lee-428
26th Nov
0 Votes
+ -
Add another E
To get the entire education establishment behind this, you need another E at the beginning:
Easy Science Technology Engineering Entrepreneurship & Mathematics --
ESTEEM.
All students should be allowed to think they are smart!
Posted by dmm99
26th Nov
0 Votes
+ -
Such thinking is why core STEM skills have fallen off.
Those other classes can be complimentary classes, but trying to build those skills into a STEM class is why teaching STEM skills have become so watered down as to be almost useless.

Right to the point of the post. What is missing from STEM classes is a focus on STEM skills.

Your statement reflects the root of many problems in US schools.

"Easy Science Technology Engineering Entrepreneurship & Mathematics --
ESTEEM.
All students should be allowed to think they are smart! "

The reality is some kids are smarter at certain subjects. A good school system helps each child find their own strengths.

It does not make everything so EASY as to build false self esteem in every kid.

All you are doing is setting the child up to fail when they get a real job in the real world and find out how dumb they really are.
Posted by Hates Idiots
Updated - 26th Nov
+2 Votes
+ -
I was joking!
Totally agree with you.
Posted by dmm99
26th Nov
0 Votes
+ -
Wrong E - wrong direction.
STEM (science, technology, engineering, math) is a typical "education" pseudo-scientific buzz word desperately looking for a meaningful (federally fundable) acronym. First of all it reveals the true ignorance of educational administrators and politicians because it's a redundant concept. Technology and engineering are already subdivisions included under the colleges of science and math.

The idea of adding "entrepreneurship" as a teachable single topic just shows how intellectually crippled our society has become. However, if you want to increase the level of successful entrepreneurship, then we will necessarily have to increase the higher education focus on economics - and not just the fiscal "book keeping/CPA" type that pops into the average person's mind. Entrepreneurship success also needs physical economics already taught under heading of Physics - creating an awareness of mass transfer and mass balance processes and analysis and their relationship to fiscal economics - and how profits are really created scientifically and not by luck. Without a basic understanding of mass balance and transfer functions you end up with scientifically illiterate political/corporate leadership and private investors spending billions of dollars on dead end alternative energy programs (like biofuels, cold fusion, etc.). All the while not preparing for the end of cheap critical commodities like oil and phosphates - that produce cheap food.

Our understanding of the transfer of knowledge is fine and growing - but not being scientifically employed in our "one size fits all" educational system. What we need is a major re-organization of our entire political cronyism driven, greed motivated educational system. We need to take out political and economic motivation and return education to those with demonstrated teaching skills and an informational transfer process based on real science - reflecting the many different types of human learning processes and not the warm and fuzzy psycho/social pseudo science that is pervasive in the current dysfunctional ed. system. We also need to accept the finite economic limitations of our old rural school based education system concepts and embrace the far more efficient online course education process for the majority of students. Like it or not - online education is currently in the process of economically gutting the traditional classroom course system. High quality online courses are far preferred to over-crowded classroom courses. Good professors who teach both classroom and online courses see the overwhelming preference by students for well taught online courses - as do the college administrators. Unfortunately, the administrators are faced with tasks of filling the bricks and mortar facilities that they and their political allies coerced the public into paying for - which is allowing for-profit online institutions to grow by leaps and bounds over the past decade. STEM is simplistic solution for a complex problem proffered by those who demonstrably have no clear understanding the of the problem.
Posted by dduggerbiocepts
26th Nov
+1 Vote
+ -
When you are a hammer...
...every problem looks like a nail.

My guess is that "experts" from every academic discipline have their own idea of what needs to be added to STEM to fill in what they see as "missing". When each is done with their contribution to fixing STEM, we'll be right back where we started.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
26th Nov
+1 Vote
+ -
Entrepreneurship
I got my "STEM" degree with high honors in the early 1980's. I had very high hopes of solving "the energy crisis" and improving the human lot. I ended up going another route and in an entirely different career.
I wondered why many of my friends chose things like marketing, business administration, and other business careers. I took courses in these subjects and found the material too easy. However, success in business is not determined by GPA, it is determined mainly by luck. The luck includes being born into the right family, marrying the correct partner, having the right investments, making the right decision out of many very "correct" alternatives, etc. I unfortunately (or fortunately) will gamble only when I am "up a tree" so to speak. This is the case with many "STEM" personalities. The "luck" in "STEM" involves finding something very new and having the patent go to the company or the government and getting a nice raise, but not becoming a successful entrepreneur.
I recall the four resources from economics: Land, Labor, Capital, and Entrepreneurial sense. Unfortunately, STEM majors frequently are placed in the Labor box. They are frequently ahead of their time and can't convince the entrepreneurs in the long run decisions because most entrepreneurs are interested in making as much money as possible in the shortest period of time.
We have cases such as Michael Milken, Bernie Madoff, and other crooks out there. If one is considering turning "STEM" into "STEEM" you had better add another E. That E is most important of all, it is Ethics.
Posted by Arctic Char
Updated - 30th Nov
0 Votes
+ -
We need skilled technical workers as well as entrepreneurs
I have to agree with Lazarus. While we do indeed need entrepreneurs to drive growth, the entrepreneurs need lots of skilled professionals to turn their dreams, plans, inventions, systems, etc into operating, profitable companies. US companies are struggling to fill existing technical positions. There are millions of STEM-related jobs unfilled in the US economy, and job opportunities like these are more than enough to motivate students - even those without entrepreneurial bents. (Here is a graphic my son's teacher shared with him bolster his decision to focus on sciences: http://www.rackspace.com/blog/spotlight-on-stem-education-infographic/)


Entrepreneurism is essential for a certain leading elite, but behind those leaders we need many skilled employees - employees receiving old-fashioned wages and salaries - to provide the manpower necessary to convert innovative ideas into real companies.
Posted by SusanKJohnson
Updated - 21st Dec
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!