Follow this blog:
RSS

Vote by mail: trading accuracy for convenience?

By | October 18, 2012, 11:16 PM PDT

A new report on the U.S. election system shows that while voting machine technologies have improved, these gains could be cancelled out by errors through mail and internet voting. MIT News reports.

So, the Florida situation of 2000 probably won’t happen again, since outdated voting systems – such as punch cards and lever machines – were replaced with more reliable optical-scan or electronic voting machines.

But, there’s an increase in early voting through the mail, which is turning out to be a relatively low-accuracy method of voting, according to a new report released by MIT and Caltech.

  • Although a small set of counties still hand-count paper ballots these days, roughly 60 percent of counties use optical-scan machines, and 40 percent use other forms of electronic equipment.
  • As a result, the overall residual vote rate (the difference between the number of ballots cast and counted) dropped from 2 percent in 2000 to 1 percent in 2006 and 2008.
  • However, absentee voting is more prone than in-person voting to residual vote rates – a real problem since the percentage of Americans voting by mail or at early election centers has doubled from 14 percent in 2000 to 28 percent in 2008.
  • In all, 36 states now conduct some kind of early voting.

“We’ve settled for convenience at the cost of accuracy and making sure that every vote counts,” says study coauthor Charles Stewart III at MIT.

And then there’s the issue of identification and claims of voter fraud.

The report suggests that the computerized statewide voter-registration databases required by federal law should be used in polling places, and coordinated with driver’s license photos or other identification databases. Rather than forcing all voters to first acquire ID cards, poll workers could quickly confirm voters’ identities through the use of connected databases in the polling place.

The report was released by the Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project this week.

[Via MIT News]

Image by rynosoft via Flickr

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Janet Fang

About Janet Fang

Janet Fang is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Janet Fang

Janet Fang
Contributing Editor, Healthcare

Janet Fang has written for Nature, Discover and the Point Reyes Light. She is currently a lab technician at Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory. She holds degrees from the University of California, Berkeley and Columbia University. She is based in New York.

Follow her on Twitter.

Janet Fang

Janet Fang

Janet does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
4
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
How to fix the voting system.
1) Open all polls and 00:01 election day EST. Close all polls at midnight EST.
2) Ban all election reporting and advertising/campaigning while polls are open (under the no campaigning near a polling place laws, the only way to ensure this with modern technology is a complete ban.) No pre or post vote opinion polling of voters.
3) No release of election vote counts until noon the day after the election, at which time all results would be released.
4) ALL vote counts released and published in the media, down to individuals not campaigning who received a single vote.
5) Mandated voting similar to Australia...if you're eligible to vote, you must vote.

This eliminates the 'me too' effect and negates the advantages of winning Eastern states and thus affecting voting in Western states as well as the 'looks like he's going to win, I'll vote for/against him and the 'silent majority.'
Posted by wizoddg
Updated - 19th Oct
+3 Votes
+ -
Vote by mail
The story doesn't really explain how vote by mail is less accurate. Here in Oregon we've been exclusively vote by mail for over a decade (I should be receiving my ballot any day now) and I've seen no reason to think it's less accurate than voting in person. The ballots are still counted on opti-scan counters.

What should be banned is purely electronic voting machines. They're too easy to hack with no way to go back and check on their accuracy. Without an official hard copy ballot that can be recounted if necessary it's impossible to tell if the vote count is accurate or not.
Posted by riverat1
19th Oct
0 Votes
+ -
Just last night, I was watching an episode of "Mission Impossible"...
...from 1966, where the plot involved the de-rigging of a rigged election in some mythical third-world country.

It was depressing to see that an election conducted in a mythical third-world country 46 years ago was still more accountable than ours are today.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
19th Oct
0 Votes
+ -
changing the voting system in this way
changing the voting system in this way could bring greater revenue to Fox. Every visitor who votes on the American Idol web site would see Fox's advertising, thereby increasing ad revenue for Fox. In addition, Fox could place each performer's songs for sale next to their name on the voting page. interactive voting system
Posted by timrobert90
4th Nov
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!