Follow this blog:
RSS

U.S. tax breaks worth $150bn face the axe

By | November 19, 2012, 8:05 AM PST

Will expiring tax breaks send the United States back into recession and impact innovation?

In order to boost the American economy and lower the national debt, the United States is heading towards what is known as a fiscal cliff, a dangerous financial balance between cost-cutting and tax rises is on the horizon. One causality of recession management will be corporate tax breaks.

Worth over $150bn in the next decade, if lawmakers choose to adopt tax cuts in the next U.S. budget, these could affect small and large firms alike, according to the Financial Times. $600 billion dollars must be raised through tax and spending cuts in total to cut debt — hopefully without throwing the U.S. into a double-dip recession.

Not only may standard corporations feel the pinch as billions face being taken by fossil fuel companies, accounting methods used by manufacturers change, and low capital gains tax is removed from private equity, hedge fund, venture capital and real estate profits, but budgets are likely to be reduced from many U.S. government agencies, including the Pentagon.

Savings have to be made, but business may find the rising storm means that cuts have to be made for research, development and potentially hiring — but some American CEOs say they are willing to go ahead if corporate tax reform in 2013 lowers the current rate of 35 percent, which is one of the highest in the developed world.

However, not everyone is best pleased with the idea of raising revenue by hitting businesses.

“Some of those business provisions spur investment in manufacturing in America,” Kevin Brady, a senior Republican on the Ways and Means committee told the FT. “Cherry picking a few tax provisions here and there both on the individual and the corporate side makes it more difficult to do tax reform down the road.”

There is a silver lining, however, that the U.S. government is implementing to try and keep innovation on track. A proposal to award companies for patenting and designing new products has received support in Congress. Under the legislation’s terms, the ‘patent box‘ will give firms an additional tax break on innovative new products.

Elsewhere in Europe, the Financial Stability Board (FSB) is pushing for tighter restrictions on companies that operate like banks — known as ’shadowing banking’ — without being under the same scrutiny. These types of firms can facilitate lending and deposits in the same way as normal banks, but are held under lighter regulations, and is considered a threat to global economic health if it suffers its own credit-crunch crisis.

Image credit: Flickr

Related:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Charlie Osborne

About Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne

Contributing Editor

Charlie Osborne is a freelance journalist and graphic designer based in London. In addition to SmartPlanet, she also writes the iGeneration column for business technology website ZDNet. She holds degrees in medical anthropology from the University of Kent.

Follow her on Twitter.

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
6
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+2 Votes
+ -
Tax increases or not, spending decreases or not, the U.S. is headed for
a recession in the next couple of years, and perhaps a depression. We are already too deep with spending, and the appetite for more spending is apparently, uncontrollable.
Posted by adornoe
20th Nov
0 Votes
+ -
Please edit the 4th paragraph to clarify
Charlie,
Please edit the 4th paragraph - not sure what you are trying to say. Standard(?) corporations; being taken by oil companies? - they are manufacturers - taking a raw commodity and processing it through their complex factories (refineries) to make useful products (gasoline, diesel, aviation fuel, etc.). Not sure what your intent was but the paragraph is not too clear.
Posted by kmarchell@...
20th Nov
0 Votes
+ -
People do not realize how bad the mess is. Or how corrupt.
People freaked when Romney suggested cutting federal support for Big Bird. Anger without knowing the whole story.

Put simply, Sesame Street gets about $4 million in federal money every year to produce the show. On top of that, because of a loop hole in the tax law regarding PBS shows only, all of the money made from the merchandising and licensing of Sesame Street products is 100% income tax free.

So the taxpayers paid over $4 million to help Sesame Street pull in over $40 million in tax free income in 2011.

How is that fair tax policy?
Posted by Hates Idiots
23rd Nov
0 Votes
+ -
So how is it fair?
People make millions each year and pay 14% tax. An average American makes $35,000.00 is paying almost 30% tax. Then the former guy evades taxes by keeping in off shore banks. He also hies high priced attorneys to avoid paying additional taxes by showing "donations" to "worthy causes" What kind of bull s@!t is this?
Posted by usdoc1
23rd Nov
+1 Vote
+ -
Apples to Oranges
Don't confuse marginal tax rates with capital gains taxes and effective tax rates. Also your rates are incorrect.

The $35,000 is in three tax brackets. The marginal tax rates on an average American making $35,000 are 10% for the first $8,500, 15% for income between $8,500 and $34,500, and 25% on the last $500.

It works out like this:
$8,500 x 10% = $850
$26,000 x 15% = $3,900
$500 x 25% = $125
So, it looks like someone making $35,000 would pay $4,875, but that's $35,000 Taxable Income, and doesn't count any deductions or exemptions.

If your Wages are $35,000 a year and you're single, you have a standard deduction of $8,500 - you don't pay tax on that money, so you subract $8,500 from the $35,000 Gross Income, which leaves you with $26,500. Then, you subtract the exemption, which is $3,700 for a single person, so your taxable income is $26,500- less $3,700, which is $22,800.

So, taxes for a single American earning $35,000 look like this.
Gross income = $35,000
Taxable income (Gross income minus standard deduction and exemption) = $22,800:

$8,500 x 10% = $850
$14,300 x 15% = $2,145
Total taxes paid = $2,995.

The effective tax rate is 8.6%.

If the Bush Tax Cuts expire, the 10% bracket goes to 15%, and the 15% bracket goes to 20%, so your taxes would look like this:
$8,500 x 15% = $1,275
$14,300 x 20% = $2,860
Total taxes paid = $4,135.
The Effective Tax rate is now 11.8%.

Some people would lead you to believe that the Bush Tax Cuts only helped the rich. Not true. While the $35,000 earner saw his taxes from 11.8% down to 8.6% (a 28% decrease), the top tax bracket only went from 39% to 36%, an 8% decrease.

The reason while a very rich person might pay a 14% effective tax rate is that you don't pay Social Security Payroll Taxes on any income over $125,000,and wealthy people often make money from investments, and capital gains taxes can be as low as 15%. However, many middle income people also have captial gains, so raising this tax will penalize anyone who invests in anything, not just the wealthy.
Posted by bb_apptix
Updated - 26th Nov
0 Votes
+ -
new tangible assets tax regulation
Interesting article on tax, I work for McGladrey and there's a whitepaper on the new tangible assets tax regulation , readers will find it interesting @ bitly.com/T31Yxi
Posted by ksuresh716
26th Nov
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!