Follow this blog:
RSS

The world’s greenest companies, 2012 edition

By | October 23, 2012, 7:52 AM PDT

The headquarters of the world's greenest company, Santander Brasil.

The headquarters of the world's greenest company, Santander Brasil.

For the fourth straight year, Newsweek has released its in-depth look at sustainability within the most wealthy companies in the world.

At its most basic, Newsweek’s Green Rankings look at the 500 largest global and U.S. companies and rank them on three broad categories: environmental impact, environmental management, and environmental disclosure.

Based on their findings, here are the 20 greenest companies in the world (with home country and industry in parenthesis):

  1. Santander Brasil (Brazil/Financials)
  2. Wipro (India/Information Technology)
  3. Bradesco (Brazil/Financials)
  4. IBM (United States/IT)
  5. National Australia Bank (Australia/Financials)
  6. BT Group (United Kingdom/Telecommunications)
  7. Munich Re (Germany/Financials)
  8. SAP (Germany/IT)
  9. KPN (Netherlands/Telecommunications)
  10. Marks & Spencer Group (U.K./Retailers)
  11. Tata Consultancy Services (India/IT)
  12. Generali Group (Italy/Financials)
  13. Bell Canada Enterprises (Canada/Telecommunications)
  14. Nokia (Finland/Technology Equipment)
  15. Telefonica (Spain/Telecommunications)
  16. Santander (Spain/Financials)
  17. Fujitsu (Japan/Technology Equipment)
  18. NKSJ Holdings (Japan/Financials)
  19. Infosys (India/IT)
  20. Telefonica Brasil (Brazil/Telecommunications)

If you’re not keeping track, Brazil and India each lead the way with three companies in the top 20. If we break it down by sector, financial companies were at the top with seven, followed by IT companies and telecommunications companies with five each.

Of the 500 largest U.S. companies (since there’s not much overlap), here are the 10 greenest companies:

  1. IBM (IT)
  2. Hewlett-Packard (Technology Equipment)
  3. Sprint Nextel (Telecommunications)
  4. Dell (Technology Equipment)
  5. CA Technologies (IT)
  6. Nvidia (Technology Equipment)
  7. Intel (Technology Equipment)
  8. Accenture (IT)
  9. Office Depot (Retailers)
  10. Staples (Retailers)

One positive note, nearly all of the companies on both top 20 lists saw their green score increase from last year.

To produce these lists, Newsweek teamed with environmental research providers, Trucost and Sustainalytics. Over 700 metrics were used to determine the overall score—including emissions of nine key greenhouse gases, water use, solid-waste disposal, and emissions that contribute to acid rain and smog. The scores are weighted with metrics falling in the environmental impact and management categories receiving 45 percent (each) of the final score and environmental disclosure receiving 10 percent. (You can read the full methodology here.)

There are a lot more lists over at Newsweek, including the least green companies in the U.S., the greenest politicians, and lists of American businesses by sector.

Photo: Wikimedia Commons

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Tyler Falk

About Tyler Falk

Tyler Falk is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Tyler Falk

Tyler Falk

Contributing Editor

Tyler Falk freelance journalist based in Washington, D.C. Previously, he was with Smart Growth America and Grist. He holds a degree from Goshen College.

Follow him on Twitter.

Tyler Falk

Tyler Falk

Tyler does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what he covers.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
6
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
-1 Votes
+ -
Kinda of a best worst list
This article does not really tell you much, other than which company has the cleanest toilet.

None of them really do anything remotely positive/green for the environment.
Posted by neil.postlethwaite@...
24th Oct
+1 Vote
+ -
Not exactly...
Bradesco and Santander (in Brazil) have programs to collect rain water and recycle them for non-potable utilization. That alone helps Sao Paulo dealing with flood during intense rain seasons. Any ways, they follow new construction codes that determine that kind of facility in order to avoid waste of treated water.
In a metropolitan area with around 20 million people living, it is expected to have lots of impact in the environment, and thus, this kind of construction code is necessary. If you know how hard is to park in New York you may have an idea of what I'm talking about.
Posted by FuzzyIce
24th Oct
0 Votes
+ -
Not enough...
Very interesting to have Brazilian companies figuring like some of the most environmental in the world. But to save and recycle water is not a complete process when on top everything looks dandy, but under the buildings the sewer runs to the rivers, lakes and oceans. Simply take a look at some pictures of the Rio Tiet (river), the one which crisscross the city of So Paulo, for a fast reality check. Cant translate the smell of some Brazilian rivers in words but, believe me, they stink! And if some rivers stink, some beaches are right there. But dont even think about blaming the politicians, they have all the excuses in place. To begin with, the guilt will always be the last government that should have done
Posted by jmvneto51
Updated - 24th Oct
0 Votes
+ -
Becoming more Creen
Yes we must and its good Christian Stewardship of God's Planet Earth the only planet in the universe that can sustain life as we no it inclubing human and animal life.
Posted by BobA421
24th Oct
0 Votes
+ -
secondary sector
would be more interesting to do it for companies from the secondary sector. it would make more sense
Posted by MaudGirard
Updated - 24th Oct
0 Votes
+ -
IBM the Greenest U.S. Company? HP Close Second??
Who writes these articles? Snot-nosed kids, fully brainwashed, and fresh out of high-school? Just do a google search on: IBM CAUSED "ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION".
Go ahead, google it. What do you get? Read through the top few on the list.

Did the author even BOTHER to check up on the mainstream, paid-off NEWSWEEK MAGAZINE version of reality? Maybe the ENQUIRER NEWSPAPER would be more accurate in their reporting? (because enquiring minds want to know).

Now, let's go to the NEXT one, please google: "HEWLETT PACKARD" causes "ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION". What do you get? hmmm, I see a pattern forming here. But, let's try the NEXT one:

Please google: "SPRINT NEXTEL" causes "ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION".

So, I'm going to stop there, and let you decide for yourself whether or not this report is RIGGED. If a company is supposedly going GREEN, then don't they have a RESPONSIBILITY to COMPLETELY clean up their previous ENVIRONMENTAL DISASTERS? If not, they do not DESERVE to be on this list.

Please explain the continuing stream of E-WASTE that SPRINT, HP, AND IBM cause EACH AND EVERY DAY, and why it appears to be NO END IN SIGHT to the INSANITY of their practices?
Posted by DarinDSelby
24th Oct
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!