Follow this blog:
RSS

The Morning Briefing: High speed rail

By | October 11, 2012, 1:38 AM PDT

“The Morning Briefing” is SmartPlanet’s daily roundup of must-reads from the web. This morning we’re reading about high-speed rail.

1.) High-Speed rail investing: Is this California’s bridge to nowhere? Some call it a boondoggle; some call it necessary for infrastructure development. Whatever you call it, high-speed rail construction officially launched this month.

2.) Minister — ‘We will fast-track HS2 high speed rail‘. The Government will defy “grief and hassle” from its own backbenchers and fast-track plans for a new high-speed rail link between London and Birmingham.

3.) Sydney-Canberra flights will end if fast rail arrives: report. If high-speed rail goes ahead instead of a second Sydney airport being built, airlines will not fly between Sydney and Canberra.

4.) China unveils high-speed ‘Ice Train,’ but is it safe? China expects 10,000 miles (160,000 kilometers) of high-speed train tracks to link 24 cities by 2020, but its latest feat, a high-speed “ice train,” may be its most ambitious plan to date.

5.) Director lauds short-term bullet train benefits. With unemployment still above 12 percent in the Inland area, local officials are turning to any and all options for job creation — including a planned statewide bullet train system that won’t link Los Angeles and the Bay Area for a decade.

Image credit: California High Speed Rail Authority / Associated Press

Related:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Charlie Osborne

About Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne

Contributing Editor

Charlie Osborne is a freelance journalist and graphic designer based in London. In addition to SmartPlanet, she also writes the iGeneration column for business technology website ZDNet. She holds degrees in medical anthropology from the University of Kent.

Follow her on Twitter.

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
5
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
widen the rail bed NOW!
As long as they are going to high speed rail, they might as well double the width of the rail bed. It would make the cars more stable, double the passenger per car and freight capacity which might lower ticket prices. Is it feasible to use carbon fiber and polymer hybrid material for cross ties ? It seems like that could lower rail bed maintenance drastically.
Posted by whrinkles
11th Oct
+1 Vote
+ -
I would love to see the US do what Italy is doing
Getting the government, and taxpayer subsidies, out of HSR and allowing privately owned HSR running on dedicated tracks.

The new Italian HSR trains are a departure from current HSR train designs. They use a propulsion model similar to the NYC subway system where the drive components are dispersed among the trains cars instead of being located in one large locomotive pushing or pulling the train.

The design offers better traction on grades and in wet weather, but more importantly it allows for a more efficient train design leading to a higher passenger capacity on a train the same size as current TVGs. Another efficiency of the design are the permanent-magnet motors that consume less power and have a higher power to weight ratio than the asynchronous motors used by current trains.

The compact size of these motors not only allows them to be placed in the train cars, but have an added benefit of being quieter than current HSR designs. Europe does not have as bad a NIMBY problem as the US does, but this design should be looked at by all US HSR proponents as a way to manage the inevitable NIMBY fights that will come up over noise.

Lower power use, increased passenger capacity and dedicated rails are keys to making HSR cost effective to run without taxpayer subsidies. There is no reason why California should fail to build their HSR system as anything less than a state of the art system with built in operational cost efficiency.

http://www.raileurope.com/blog/4107-new-italian-high-speed-trains

On a side note. The propulsion layout of the new Italian trains provides better traction and would be a safer design for mountains than Chinas conventional layout ICE train.
Posted by Hates Idiots
Updated - 11th Oct
+2 Votes
+ -
Personally, I think the US should do something similar...
...to what it did 150 years ago: It should obtain the right-of-way for proposed routes, and then lease that right-of-way to private companies that would then build and operate the lines. This would overcome the primary obstacle of building a line while assuring that those lines would be built and operated profitably.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
11th Oct
0 Votes
+ -
Rail in the US
At any rate, the US has a dramatic problem with lack of Rail infrastructure, not to mention light rail and tram services. (how do I know? http://igg.me/p/236714?a=1362962). Time for a bit of broader forward thinking towards rail, and away from flights. Short distance flights are, with the state of fossil fuels and climate change, pretty stupid in every sense. As for profitability of rail services, apart from the fact that I consider public transport to be a PUBLIC SERVICE for which we pay taxes, not a for-profit business endeavor, profits are easily calculable with increased use at every inevitable rise in petrol costs, until driving becomes undoable altogether. Investment at this point is essential.
Posted by carriehampel
14th Oct
0 Votes
+ -
I'd be all for the "public service" aspect of rail...
...if it weren't for the fact that you are expecting a government that manages to loose money selling burgers and soft drinks to run such a system in any meaningful way.

Heck, the Federal government even manages to loose money selling booze and sex.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
15th Oct
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!