Follow this blog:
RSS

The Morning Briefing: Going nuclear

By | February 14, 2013, 11:11 PM PST

“The Morning Briefing” is SmartPlanet’s daily roundup of must-reads from the web. This morning we’re reading about nuclear power.

1.) Nuclear energy: Flexible fission. At the Baltic Shipyard in St Petersburg squats the hull of the Akademik Lomonosov. It is no ordinary ship. Once it is finished in three years’ time, it will be Russia’s first floating nuclear power plant.

2.) North Korea’s nuclear test. The nuclear explosion that North Korea set off on February 12th deep in a hillside in the country’s north-east would, the regime immediately assured, pose no “negative impact on the surrounding ecological environment.” The negative impact on North-East Asia’s security environment, on the other hand, was instant.

3.) A bad day for the Iranian nuclear crisis. The Western-led effort to slow or halt Iran’s nuclear development suffered two significant setbacks Thursday. Taken together with other events from the past two weeks, it’s hard to see much cause for optimism at the moment.

4.) New nuclear power in the U.K. looking increasingly unlikely. The U.K. government has been planning the development of a ‘next generation’ of nuclear power plants in the region for some time, but with the price of renewables falling quickly and the costs of nuclear rising, it is looking increasingly likely that the plans will have to be scrapped.

5.) Chernobyl: workers evacuated. Workers were forced to evacuate after a roof collapsed at Chernobyl, the site of the world’s worst nuclear disaster, on Wednesday.

Image credit: Blatant World

Related:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Charlie Osborne

About Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne

Contributing Editor

Charlie Osborne is a freelance journalist and graphic designer based in London. In addition to SmartPlanet, she also writes the iGeneration column for business technology website ZDNet. She holds degrees in medical anthropology from the University of Kent.

Follow her on Twitter.

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
3
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Going away from nuclear is more accurate...
Just announced. Crystal River (Florida) will be permanently closed. A Wisconsin reactor will also close in 2013.

Finnish nuclear reactor Olkiluoto 3 is likely to be delayed to 2016. This will put it 7 years over schedule and massively over budget.

The planned Czech atomic-plant at Temelin is looking unlikely. Additionally the purposed Romanian and Bulgarian reactors are running into financing problems. Private money wants nothing to do with nuclear.

In the meantime, enough solar was installed around the world in the last two years to produce as much electricity as 10 medium sized nuclear reactors. We just passed the 100 GW of installed solar point. The production equivalent of 16 reactors.

Utility scale solar in the US has fallen in price to where it is now cheaper than new nuclear. The most recently disclosed for a large solar installation in New Mexico shows the price of electricity (without subsidies) to be just above 10 cents per kWh. And that is major when you consider that solar supplies power when we would otherwise be purchasing very expensive gas peaking power.
Posted by Wallace Bob
15th Feb
0 Votes
+ -
Unfortunately, it can't do the one thing a nuclear plant can...
...which is consistently produce power at a controlled level indefinitely. Unless it can fulfill the same level of utility, direct cost comparisons are completely pointless. Until we come up with an efficient storage solution for solar (and wind, for that matter) it will not be competitive at any level. What's the point if we have to keep coal, gas, and yes, nuclear plants online 24/7 as a backup? That more than eliminates any cost advantage.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
15th Feb
0 Votes
+ -
Hardly encouraging
"... the regime immediately assured, pose no negative impact on the surrounding ecological environment.

Governments have never had a particularly good record of gauging health and environmental impacts of their own policies, ours included.

As for North Korea and Iran, I am certain our new Secretary of State is at this very moment browsing the "Swift, Strong, Response" section at the local Hallmark store.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
Updated - 15th Feb
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!