Follow this blog:
RSS

The ‘privacy visor’ that stops surveillance in its tracks

By | January 25, 2013, 6:21 AM PST

Worried about the rising amount of surveillance tools used in the West? Perhaps a pair of these visors will calm your fears.

It’s not just police and governmental departments that are known for using surveillance and tracking technology. Security cameras double-up as data harvesters, bars and pubs track people for use with mobile device applications, and retail mannequins keep an eye on your facial expressions and walking patterns as you shop.

It’s becoming part-and-parcel of everyday life in the West — whether we are aware that it exists or not. However, that doesn’t mean solutions are not available for the privacy and surveillance-conscious among us.

Tokyo’s National Institute of Informatics are developing a pair of glasses that can protect you against facial recognition software used by social networks such as Facebook, and prevent you from being identified by hidden cameras.

The “privacy visor” (.pdf) uses a light source bordering on infrared — something that human eyes are incapable of seeing, but sophisticated cameras can. Once these lights cover areas near your eyes and nose, facial-recognition software is unable to register your features and identify you when a photo is taken.

The creator, Isao Echizen, says:

“As a result of developments in facial recognition technology in Google images, Facebook et cetera and the popularisation of portable terminals that append photos with photographic information … essential measures for preventing the invasion of privacy caused by photographs taken in secret and unintentional capture in camera images is now required.”

The glasses, although not as fashion-conscious as Google Glass, will be “reasonably priced.” Failing that, why not simply tip your head at a 15-degree angle to fool camera into thinking you don’t have a face?

(via BBC)

Image credit: National Institute of Informatics

Related:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Charlie Osborne

About Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne

Contributing Editor

Charlie Osborne is a freelance journalist and graphic designer based in London. In addition to SmartPlanet, she also writes the iGeneration column for business technology website ZDNet. She holds degrees in medical anthropology from the University of Kent.

Follow her on Twitter.

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
7
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
privacy visor
I think Bono wears these already.
Posted by veetmeter
26th Jan
0 Votes
+ -
This idea was shown in a different form at DEFCON.
It was in the form of a baseball-type cap with IREDs embedded in the visor. They would also illuminate in a flashing way which disrupts the images the cameras take.

It's a good idea and should be developed so it's easy to use without strange glasses.

Then there is always the medeival way.. a monk's robe and hood. A hoodie, but superlightweight to stay cool, not sweaty.
Posted by opcom
Updated - 29th Jan
0 Votes
+ -
experimenters please use care
This is something many people can try. Please use care when using highbrightness infrared LEDs. It is absolutely possible to shine a superbright one into the eye and cause damage, but not see or feel it, only see a very dull red glow. You can look at the die in the LED and see its dull glow. What you are really doing is staring into an extremely bright pinpoint light. It's bad for the retina. So, please use common sense and be aware of this. just avoid staring into the business end, and all should be well.
Posted by opcom
29th Jan
0 Votes
+ -
don't look at the light
and wear a sign to warn others....

Why, exactly, is everyone worried about hiding where they go and what they do...?
Posted by wizoddg
19th Mar
0 Votes
+ -
Use them for license plates
I'd prefer we start pulling down , shooting and painting the cameras we've told the government we don't like the spying and they won't listen , i figure it's out tax dollars we can wreck them if we want .
Posted by cptfreakout
29th Jan
0 Votes
+ -
"Failing that, why not simply tip your head at a 15-degree angle...
...because you have no idea where the cameras are since they can now be made to have only a visible pinhole.

I'm surprised that most security cameras still don't have cameras at floor level looking up, since even half-wit thieves know better than to look at the cameras...
Posted by wizoddg
19th Mar
0 Votes
+ -
"Use them for license plates"
Different situation entirely--license plates exist o that you are NOT anonymous, and at least in the US you have no 'right to drive.'
Posted by wizoddg
19th Mar
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!