Follow this blog:
RSS

Survey says the U.K. holds most of the world’s ’soft power’

By | November 26, 2012, 11:47 AM PST

While many of us look to indicators such as Gross Domestic Product or even Gross National Happiness to determine a country’s “success,” there’s another squishy yet sophisticated lens to consider: what’s known as soft power. First coined in the 1980s by the political scientist and Harvard faculty member Joseph Nye (made famous in his 2005 book Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics), the term is generally understood — and I’m being very basic in this description — as a reference to global cultural influence.

One very softly powerful publication, the glossy Monocle magazine, which covers the intersection of business, style, and politics, has recently released its third annual Soft Power Survey in its December/January issue. Appropriately, the ranking of 30 of the world’s leaders in soft power was determined with a bit of subjectivity when it comes to the quality of a country’s collective design abilities. The editors used some quantitative evidence, too, such as the number of foreign students in the nation (presumably, a sign of a country’s attractiveness).

“The rapidly evolving nature of world politics is throwing up a host of new challenges for the practitioners of statecraft,” write Monocle’s editors in the introduction to the survey online (available to subscribers only). “A shifting balance of global power and the effects of instant information have made soft power a critical component of foreign policy strategies.” An audio countdown of the Top 20 can be heard on Monocle’s site. Keeping with Monocle’s jet-set brand, it’s of course read in sexy, sophisticated British accents and features elegantly simple visuals of the top-ranked nations flags and an icon indicating whether it moved up or down on the Monocle list from last year.

Some highlights of the 2012 ranking: Turkey makes the top 20 for the first time, thanks to the popularity of its soap operas across Europe and the bold new routes of Turkish Airlines, according to Monocle.

The top 20 is dominated by chic European nations, some lacking in economic power although they might still hold cultural cachet: Belgium, Austria, Spain, the Netherlands, Italy, Finland, Norway, Denmark, Sweden, to name several (or so). There are two Asian nations in the top 20: South Korea, at number 9, thanks to K-Pop’s international appeal, and Japan, at number 6, because ”its fashion, food…are formidable assets.” China, if you’re curious, ranks 22.

There’s one South American country included: yes, Brazil, coming in at 17. As Monocle’s editors explain, “we all like Brazilians…[and Brazil's] ability to mix people of all cultures.” Not all is glorification in the Monocle analysis, however: the editors make it clear that Brazilian corruption is certainly a challenge in that nation. Other well-liked countries Canada and Australia come in at number 8 and number 7, respectively.

France, listed as number 3 in 2011 and a perennial capital of enviable style and culture, slipped to #4. The Top 3 are Germany (3rd); the United States (2nd); and the United Kingdom (1st). The U.S. and the U.K. have changed ranks from last year. To Monocle’s editors, the London Olympics celebrations highlighted not only the U.K.’s innovative culture through the ages, but also symbolized its current dominance in areas such as high fashion and art. And, largely via the 2012 Olympics, the U.K. leads in pop-cultural and architectural spectacle, too.

Image: Ktrinko/Wikimedia Commons

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Reena Jana

About Reena Jana

Reena Jana was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2011 to 2013.

Reena Jana

Reena Jana

Contributing Editor

Reena Jana has written for the New York Times, Wired, Harvard Business Review online, Fast Company, Architectural Record, Artforum, Time Out New York, Harper's Bazaar, and GQ. Previously, she was the innovation department editor at BusinessWeek. She holds degrees from Columbia University and Barnard College.

Follow her on Twitter.

Reena Jana

Reena Jana

Reena occasionally consults with companies, and when her writing discusses a corporation or other organization with which she has worked, she will disclose this fact. Reena does not hold any investments in the companies she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
8
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
-1 Votes
+ -
What we need
is to get rid of this competitive nonsense altogether.

Yes, I'm British (for lack of a less cringeworthy title) but like most of us, I actually couldnt care less about the stylings of some idiot company.

Lets look at influence shall we?
Our cuisine is mostly stolen from the French, unless you class dead animal boiled with vegetables as cultured. Our customs are laughed at by our neighbours, and we are known as soft on immigrants. (Perhaps this is whats meant by soft power; how many cheap immigrant workers a nation controls. I live on the South Coast, arable land used for growing wheat, brassica and fruit - picked exclusively by teams of Europeans who collect outside the work agencies at 5 in the morning. We dont even grow our own food without 'assistance').
The Victorian mastery of steel and coal died before WW2, and the resources wasted on that ensured that the entire of Europe was as depressed as our economy, and no-one was interested in who was top of anything; we were all rebuilding.

Granted our language is spoken by most of the world as a second at least, but even that is a mixture of European words co-opted into the dialectical mess we call English. We cant even agree how to pronounce most things among ourselves.

The first nation that manages to break parochialism gets my vote. We're humans for ****s sake.
Posted by SiO2
Updated - 27th Nov
-1 Votes
+ -
Was the word "G-o-d's" censored by this site?
Or was that some other word?
Posted by adornoe
27th Nov
0 Votes
+ -
Settle down
@adornoe, I'm not into blasphemy. It only annoys the religious, and I have no beef with belief.

I was looking for something more universally human... You may, if you wish, pick a verb for it that deeply offends you and rail at me for it instead...?

wink
Posted by SiO2
27th Nov
0 Votes
+ -
What the eff are you talking about?
All I did was to question the censoring that seemed to occur with your last sentence.

Besides, the word in question is not even a verb. So, why don't you go to school to learn the difference.

Also, my question had nothing to do at all with religion, and it was more about the censorship which I thought was taking place, where I believed that "God" was being replaced by the "*" (asterisks).

Also, you are assuming too much, believing that my question was due to my religious beliefs. You don't know me, and you should stop assuming too much.
Posted by adornoe
28th Nov
+1 Vote
+ -
Actually
to **** is a verb, which I self censored. I went to a Grammar school, use several human languages, including BSL, and program regularly in numerous artificial ones on a daily basis.

And, yes I did assume, a valid assumption seeing as God's would be asterisked to ***'s, negating the need for the question - leaving only the fact you picked one word and assumed a great deal yourself about what that word was.

I'm sorry you misinterpreted - I have no problem with your belief or disbelief in a deity. Fact is, its got no place on this board in any case, so there is no argument.

Peace
Posted by SiO2
29th Nov
-2 Votes
+ -
Sooner or later, "soft power" hits "hard reality".
I am not saying any of the following to rag on Britain. But Britain's "soft" aspirations are hardly anything to envy, and I just consider them 10 years ahead of where the US is heading, and it's not good; An unsustainable nanny-welfare state and a population that doesn't seem to care.

A recent study in England found 352,000 households in which nobody had ever worked. Moreover, two-thirds of the adults in those households said that they didn't want to work. As in America, such people feel both "entitled" and aggrieved.

In barely more than generation, socialism turned Britain from the leader of a global empire to today's "soft power" of pop culture. The most telling example was the opening show at last summer's Olympic Games, which while supposedly telling the story of Great Britain, spent roughly 80% of that show on pop culture instead of the social & technical aspects that materially changed the world.

I thought it was sad.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
Updated - 27th Nov
0 Votes
+ -
Ironically
We seem to be divided on that. The Games have spawned a rash of TV programmes and other propaganda that tells the great story of the British, how we practically ruled the world through colonialism built on our inventiveness and resource. All very grand, and somewhat true as well - the story as told is something to be proud of.
Trouble is, the show you mention only did focus on where the story actually ended, where britain lost its capital B and became a member state of a larger collective. Most of the (British) people I speak to roughly agree that the Games is a total sham, waste of money and this time, laughable to boot.

The apathy of which you speak isnt just a British thing, its becoming global. The Games are supposed to be about who has the strongest, fastest and most skilled athletes, but the focus is on everybody sharing the glory and being a part of the show now. Ridiculous...
It spills out into X Factor, Rock Band and the like and is a symptom of something much larger than a single country's 'socialism'. I'd like to think it was a sign of a more global society emerging, but it probably isnt. Not if our myopic leaders have anything to say about it at any rate.

Peace
Posted by SiO2
27th Nov
0 Votes
+ -
soft power
Ok. I'll accept the idea. But, the 'leadership' of Britain is doing it's level best to shot itself in the foot, and make Britain an also-ran in the long term. The over-insistence on DRM and IP enforcement will cause a stagnation of long-term progress. And it will only reap short term profits for legacy industries. Placing roadblocks in the way of innovation will slow growth, or send it off, away from what you really want to protect and nurture. Stop SOPA and all of it's descendants from propagating.
Posted by garyfizer@...
27th Nov
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!