Follow this blog:
RSS

Solar group to World Bank: Give us gas and oil’s $12B, and we’ll cool planet

By | November 22, 2012, 4:55 AM PST

Hot Spots: Desertec has identified large swathes of continents suitable for "concentrated solar power" that could wean the world off fossil fuels.

Square these two sentences:

  • Earlier this week, the World Bank called for urgent action to stop catastrophic global warming.
  • Over the last 6 years, the World Bank has financed $12 billion worth of fossil fuel projects - the sort of thing that stokes the planetary thermometer -  according to renewables energy group Desertec Foundation.

Scratching your head?

So is Desertec, the Hamburg, Germany international outfit that wants to build solar power plants in the deserts of North Africa, the Middle East, China, the U.S., Australia and elsewhere to wean the world off of fossil fuels.

Desertec director Thiemo Gropp. To paraphrase him: "Please, sir, can I have $12 billion?"

The group’s director, Thiemo Gropp, has issued an open proclamation under the headline, “$12 billion in World Bank funds would be better invested in desert power than in fossil fuels.”

In one overarching project, Desertec aims to provide 15 percent of Europe’s electricity by 2050 via solar plants in places like Morocco and Egypt. It’s particularly fond of “concentrated solar power” in which mirrors reflect sunlight onto a fluid that heats up and ultimately drives a steam turbine.

It’s also keen on wind energy. It targets substantial reduction in CO2 emissions - and CO2’s warming effects - via a substantial switch to renewable energy.

Of course the money - not to mention the politics and infrastructure - can be prohibitive. Thus the request for $12 billion.

“Had this $12 billion been invested in harnessing renewable energy in the sites where the wind blows the hardest or the sun shines the fiercest such as, for example, the deserts of Asia, the Americas and Africa, our mitigation efforts would already have taken a big step forward,” Gropp says.

The Washington, D.C.-based World Bank’s mission is to provide loans to developing countries and reduce poverty. Gropp applauds it for already spending considerably on climate change.

He also praises it for earlier this week urging individual countries to redirect fossil fuel subsidies into renewables. Now, he says, the bank should heed its own advice.

Images from Desertec Foundation.

More Desertec and big solar, on SmartPlanet:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Mark Halper

About Mark Halper

Mark Halper is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Contributing Editor

Mark Halper has written for TIME, Fortune, Financial Times, the UK's Independent on Sunday, Forbes, New York Times, Wired, Variety and The Guardian. He is based in Bristol, U.K.

Follow him on Twitter.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Mark has no financial holdings in the companies he writes about. He occasionally travels at the expense of companies or their press relations agencies in order to report on a company or industry event related to it; Mark will prominently disclose this information when appropriate. This relationship will have no influence on his coverage. Companies he covers do not get to review columns in advance, or select or reject topics.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
8
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
What hypocrites.
The World Bank leader was just decrying how bad global warming is and then funds 12 Billion in fossil fuel projects. How hypocritical can you get? This is why most people do not believe the myth of global warming.
Posted by RobertMoore12@...
22nd Nov
+1 Vote
+ -
Not hypocrites, just incomplete reporting
Now, now. Let's not forget that the money invested in fossil fuels will power many more homes than what it would power with renewable energy right now. The technology and infrastructure still needs to develop and become as cheap as fossil. During this transition period, lenders need to increase their share of renewable energy loans but not stop loans for cheap fossil either, especially relatively cleaner power like gas, as that would just leave many without power. So unless you're happy for everybody to stop having kids or you're happy for many to go without power... You need to leave room for both. The journalist should have mentioned that. THAT's why people are confused about what to do about global warming.
Posted by aliciamontoya
22nd Nov
+3 Votes
+ -
Hypocrisy - yes, but...
... not related to global warming at all, but rather how unpredictable the powers to be are because they always turn in the direction in which the wind blows favourably for them. It just shows - that just like the government - they can't be trusted when they feed you with their one hand and take all you have with the other.

My personall association with the story is that when dealing and negotiating, the inhabitants of the middle east, India, Pakistan and even Greece (just to name a few), are notorious for being able to strip you down of all your belongings and leave you naked in the process, while at the same time they cunningly manage to instill a warm and pleasant feeling inside you that you somehow ended on top of the deal and they are the actual loosers, or as the englishmen would say - getting something for nothing (it also works vice-versa but I prefer the first option if related to me :)!)

That is exactly what this World Bank mockery smells of - a farce!
Posted by fo128
Updated - 23rd Nov
+1 Vote
+ -
Show me the money
Gotta wonder if there Solyndra executives involved.

No thanks, we already have enough money taken from us for failed concepts.
If you believe the world needs cooling, figure a way to do it on your own dime.
Posted by FoodStampPlanet
23rd Nov
+2 Votes
+ -
Everyone's got a great idea to solve all the world's problems...
...as long as they have access to OPM. (Other people's money)
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
23rd Nov
0 Votes
+ -
Decentralized solar makes more money
Desertec can't possible work. As was detailed in the Hermann Scheer book: Energy Imperative.
We need a solar Feed-in Tariff policy for SF that requires PG&E to pay all homeowners $0.54 kwh for feeding solar onto the grid. Solar is best gathered where it is used & needed. That makes money for the family & gives them power after an earthquake, or when the grid goes down. Mayor Ed Lee agrees with me. See the video: Youtube: paul8kangas. How much energy is lost in transmission? Making money for centralize corporations is a bad idea. Decentralize.
Posted by Paul kangas
23rd Nov
0 Votes
+ -
Mercurtec
You could put the plants on Mercury; there is even more solar potential. Then you have only to solve the problem of grid conection by making a variable powerline stretching between 100 and 200 million kilometers.
Posted by praoss
10th Jan
0 Votes
+ -
give me 1billion and I'll do better
www.orionsolartech.com has the worlds most versatile and dynamic solar energy system.
I would have this all over the planet for 12 billion and it would be more popular than granite counter tops with their no ROI
Posted by Gary McCallum
Updated - 28th Jan
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!