Follow this blog:
RSS

SmartPlanet: What’s in store for 2013

By | January 4, 2013, 3:27 AM PST

We had a pretty great year here at SmartPlanet in 2012. And judging from early indicators, we’re going to have an even better one in 2013. (Which means as a reader, you will, too.)

So if you’ll indulge me, a quick note on what’s been done — and what’s to come.

The most common piece of feedback about SmartPlanet in 2011 is that you wanted us to be smarter: more analysis, more reporting, better writing, more editing. You came to SP for intelligence but thought we could do better.

That’s exactly what we did this year: we hired a bunch of professional journalists, boosted our budget and brought you the good stuff. Last year, we were essentially a powerhouse blog network focused on innovation. This year, we became a kick-ass, coherent publication focused on global business innovation. That’s no small feat. (Thanks for sticking with us during the transition.)

We enter 2013 on extremely firm footing. Our readership — that’s you! — is rock-solid. Our writers are striking out and taking on more difficult assignments, and they’re paying off. Editorially, we’re trying new things every chance we can get. (Even if they don’t work out.) And our sole advertiser, IBM, continues to support us with great enthusiasm, as it has since we at CBS relaunched SmartPlanet in 2009. It’s hard to find that kind of stability in the wake of a global economic crisis, but here we are.

There are several things we weren’t able to achieve in 2012. Despite our editorial reorganization, the website — lovely as it is — still reflects the old structure and look, which is confusing. (We’re going to address that in the spring.) Our leaf-and-grass logo fails to embody our focus; we’re going to revisit that this year, too. And we’re going to put an extra push behind our mobile efforts — phone and tablet — now that so many of you are using them to read SmartPlanet.

On the editorial front, we’re going to keep focusing on quality. Just before the holiday break, I appointed four editors — congratulations Adrienne Lewin, Aly Windsor, Heather Clancy and Laura Shin! — to oversee different sections of the site. Over the last four months, we’ve been turning bloggers into writers and urging them to go out into the world and tell us about the great people, places and ideas they discover.

Bottom line: SmartPlanet should be an absolute delight to read. That’s what we’re working toward.

But we can’t do it alone. We need your help. Keep the feedback coming — you can use the contact link in my bio below to send it directly to me — and tell us what you do and don’t like.

And please, tell your friends about us. Share our articles. Pass along our newsletter. This is a community; let’s grow together.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Andrew Nusca

About Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca is the editor of SmartPlanet.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca

Editor

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet and an associate editor for ZDNet. Previously, he worked at Money, Men's Vogue and Popular Mechanics magazines. He holds degrees from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and New York University. He based in New York but resides in Philadelphia.

Follow him on Twitter.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca
Andrew Nusca does not hold any investments in the companies he covers.
If you liked this, don't miss...
20
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
Environmental Issues
Further issues with the environment (causes uncertain, but does not mean do bugger all), like erratic weather, melting of some ice sheets/glaciers, warming of some sea's devastating coral, disruption of ecosystems by near extermination apex predators like sharks (for fin soup) or the accidental introduction of species wiping out indigenous population like Lion fish in the Atlantic..................
Posted by neil.postlethwaite@...
4th Jan
+3 Votes
+ -
factual reporting would be real nice...
...without a spin of any kind. too many of your articles present opinion as fact with a very liberal spin on them.

others and I have called the authors on this kind of 'reporting', please look through some of the readers comments for lots of examples.
Posted by Cabo Wabo Addict
4th Jan
+5 Votes
+ -
We have lots of factual reporting. LOTS.
But I concede that we aren't doing a very good job labeling where we do reportage versus commentary. It's not zero sum, and there's room on this site for both. But there's clearly misperception we need to address.
Posted by andrew.nusca
4th Jan
-2 Votes
+ -
"lots of factual reporting"
does not excuse the occasional liberal jabs... You say there is room on this site for both reporting and commentary. Yes, you definitely need to "label" each so your conservative readers can pass over your "commentary" articles before getting to the last few lines in the article, where the liberal agenda is usually planted.
Posted by Jeffp77
7th Jan
0 Votes
+ -
This is an open forum. We respect all opinions.
And we've got plenty of politically conservative readers who contribute to the discussion in a positive way.

But if you're going to troll us in our own comments, please go. Our only "agenda" is making sure that tin-hat theories like this (agenda? really?) don't continue.
Posted by andrew.nusca
10th Jan
+8 Votes
+ -
Medicine for dummies, art stuff, sustainable living, disaster planning
Well done on a brilliant newsletter. I'd love you to continue with all the above please plus the environmental stuff, social science and other sciencey issues. Plus anything quirky. Just what you've been doing really. I often share the medical stuff with colleagues in healthcare as it is often food-for-thought (especially the neurological stories) and the disaster response and sustainability stuff helps with my job as an emergency planner (and it's interesting anyway).You do what the BBC set out to achieve: to inform, educate and entertain. Again - very well done.
Posted by jayneheaney
4th Jan
0 Votes
+ -
Well gosh, thanks!
Count on it.
Posted by andrew.nusca
4th Jan
+2 Votes
+ -
CHANGES?
Just one tiny item, an error most sites make is to change appearance just for the "new" look", Would prefer most just "leave the look" and use resources to improve the product. We would think someone has learned the lesson of Detroit auto when for years they just changed "the look", and foreign cars "changed the workings" guess who sold better, but guess web design folks need work. Will withhold on rest of your promises until I see them/
Posted by hmmmmm!
4th Jan
0 Votes
+ -
Nope, this is all about function.
I think we can do a better job letting the site get out of the way of the stories. Wouldn't you agree?
Posted by andrew.nusca
4th Jan
0 Votes
+ -
I agree about the functionality
I almost always get to the site from the daily email newsletter, by those few times I've gone to the website first, it has been a little difficult to find what I was interested in or looking for. I haven't done that enough to make any specific recommendations or even to say now what I found to be frustrating, but I am encouraged that you have a plan.
Posted by AlanLaRue
6th Jan
0 Votes
+ -
Thanks for this, Alan.
I suspected this was the case for many of you. Good feedback to have.
Posted by andrew.nusca
10th Jan
+1 Vote
+ -
Kudos
Site has been immensely informative and useful. Often quoted, and used to prod legislators, both state and federal. Don't believe the site has been in the way of the stories, and the quality of the stories has continually improved. Have not noticed any particular bias or spin unless such things as accepting climate change as a given is somehow a bias, but do appreciate it when an author precedes or follows an opinion with something like "In the author's opinion..." Looking forward to your coverage 0f 2013!
Posted by GlennSL
4th Jan
+4 Votes
+ -
Sins of omission
There were plenty of stories about global warming that were overlooked by SP's staff because they did not present the orthodoxy that man-made global warming will destroy our civilization. For example, there was a paper published in Nature's Climate Change journal that tree ring data indicates that Roman times were hotter than today, with changes in the earth's orbit contributing more than four times any current anthropogenic warming (see http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v2/n12/full/nclimate1589.html ). This is in stark contrast to climatologists who keep insisting that the earth's climate was cooler before 1750.

Another report missed by SP's staff was a report by the US Energy Information Administration that U.S. energy-related CO2 emissions in early 2012 were the lowest since 1992, bringing us almost to Kyoto treaty levels (see http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=7350 ). While warm weather helped, the biggest factor was the continuing switch from coal to natural gas in electricity generation. This benefit from fracking got almost no discussion by SP's staff. While it's not a long-term solution, it's done far more to reduce our carbon emissions than renewable energy has to date.

Yes, there's a lot of hysteria out there from people who don't believe in man-made global warming. But lost in all the noise is plenty of evidence that we don't know anywhere near the whole picture yet. And also missing here at SP is any serious look at solutions other than windmills and solar panels.
Posted by zackers
4th Jan
+1 Vote
+ -
If we missed a study...
...it's because we simply don't have the resources to cover it.

We've been very good, I think, in recognizing that intermittent renewable energy sources aren't the only answers to energy production. (We cover oil and gas, too, for that reason.)

I don't believe we've covered this particular angle of fracking, which sounds fascinating. But it's not a deliberate omission -- it's just a symptom of the fact that we cover many other industries besides energy, and there's only so many folks to go around.
Posted by andrew.nusca
4th Jan
+1 Vote
+ -
Going atomic
I think we've thrown a few words on nuclear into the SmartPlanet reactor as well..
Posted by markhalper
5th Jan
0 Votes
+ -
ped-al
is there something ped-al going on?
in 3 sentences you have "kick-ass", "no small feat" (thrown in for comic relief) and on "firm footing".
Posted by Sunon@...
4th Jan
0 Votes
+ -
I had to read this three times before I understood what you were saying
...but bravo, sir. I'm glad to send a thrill up your leg. So to speak.
Posted by andrew.nusca
4th Jan
0 Votes
+ -
That's all fine & dandy, but.....
PLEASE do something about the app!!! (at least the iPhone version; I don't know if there is an Android version so I can't comment on that.)

I have encountered several issues since its inception, and it still sucks. And when I try to comment on it via the feedback feature within the app, all I get is a response from TechRepublic asking me why I'm contacting them when I should be contacting you. UGH! Get it together! You're supposed to be SmartPlanet, not Dumb-IgnorantPlanet.
Posted by CMJRoss
5th Jan
0 Votes
+ -
I agree; it sucks.
We don't have the resources to update it as frequently as we should. I'm hoping we address that this year.

Have you tried our mobile site (m.smartplanet....)? It's been updated and is actually better than the app right now.
Posted by andrew.nusca
10th Jan
0 Votes
+ -
SP is going great!
I have been a member for about a year, and I am reading more and more content on this site and sharing it with people. I don't have nay real suggestions on changes or improvements, other than to keep up the great work!

PS,

Thanks for your support IBM.
Posted by kinserfr
6th Jan
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!