Follow this blog:
RSS

Scientific American’s top 10 science stories of 2012

By | December 27, 2012, 8:32 PM PST

Scientific American named the top ten science stories of 2012 — a list that touches on big topics like climate change, technology and daredevil attempts that stretch the limits of humanity.

Tell us what you think of them, or what else you would add, in the comments below.

10. Exploring the depths and heights

The magazine named as notable the skydive that Felix Baumgartner made from 23 miles in the air — the highest ever — and James Cameron’s dive (photos) almost 36,000 feet below sea level, to the ocean’s deepest point. SciAm said:

The success of both feats hinged not only on the cutting-edge gear that protected the men from either thin air or crushing pressure, but also on clever thinking to reach their destinations.

9. The debunking of calorie-restricted diets for longevity

While previous studies have indicated that animals such as rats and roundworms had aged more slowly if they consumed fewer calories, a study conducted over 25 years comparing rhesus monkeys on a restricted-calorie diet to those on a normal diet found no difference. However, two factors did seem to make a difference: genetics and eating healthy food. And here are some others studies showing just what kind of food is healthy: not eating red meat, eating a Mediterranean diet or even avoiding fatty food.

8. The commercialization of space travel

As the U.S. ramped down its space shuttle program in 2011 (and China ramped up its own), private companies took up the slack. Most notably, SpaceX made a cargo delivery to the International Space Station (photos of launch).

7. Avian flu genes revealed

In 2011, two research groups identified what mutations could make a feared avian flu virus, H5N1, transmissible by air — and much more contagious. For a few months, the government, scientists and journal editors held off publishing them for fear the information would fall in the wrong hands, though others argued such information could help epidemiologists identify and fight any dangerous mutations in the wild. Eventually, they published the information.

6. Arctic sea ice reached an all-time low

On September 16, the area of ice covering the Arctic was at its smallest since record-keeping began in 1979. In recent years, scientists have said the lack of ice up north was creating strange weather patterns in the northeastern U.S. and Europe. This year, some even said the same of Hurricane Sandy:

Some scientists ventured to say that the loss of sea ice helped Hurricane Sandy “turn left” from the Atlantic Ocean into New Jersey and New York City. Such a shift in direction had never been recorded before. A “blocking high pressure system” in the North Atlantic—a likely result of the lack of ice—prevented Sandy from heading northeast out to sea, as hurricanes would typically do.

5. ‘Obamacare’ mostly upheld by Supreme Court

The health care ruling will have a large effect on scientific research, as SciAm reports:

the law contains provisions to boost comparative- and cost-effectiveness research (via the newly established Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute). Such research could lead to medical and public health advances that will help the largest number of people.

4. Publication of Encode, Encyclopedia of DNA Elements

Following on the publication of the human genome project 12 years ago, the Encode project, which stood for Encyclopedia of DNA Elements. As we wrote in September, it is helpful in understanding the behavior of cells, tissues and organs:

The news could drive drug research and help us understand the environmental influence of disease risk and even explain why one twin gets a disease while the other doesn’t.

3. The landing of NASA’s Curiosity rover on Mars

Curiosity has a pretty big mission: to look for evidence of whether life could have existed on the Red Planet. But it’s landing was itself a big deal, involving some complex maneuvering whose success caused an eruption of cheers at NASA and around the world. Here are some photos of what Curiosity saw on Mars in its first few weeks, and the first color, panoramic photos.

2. The finding of the Higgs boson

It was one of the biggest physics breakthroughs in the last century: the detection of the elusive “God particle,” the Higgs boson. As SciAm said:

The Higgs represents the final chapter in the story of 21st-century particle physics. It completes the Standard Model, the theoretical description of all the known particles and forces (and by some metrics the most successful theory in the history of science)

1. Hurricane Sandy’s destruction of the U.S.’s East Coast

“Meteorologists dubbed Sandy a “frankenstorm” for its meteorologic mash-up of a hurricane moving up from the south, a winter storm moving in from the west and a ridge of high pressure forcing the systems to merge and move inland,” says Scientific American. The superstorm caused $250 billion worth of damage and claimed about 250 lives.

Related on SmartPlanet:

via: Scientific American

photo: James Cameron, post-dive. (Mark Thiessen/National Geographic)

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Laura Shin

About Laura Shin

Laura Shin is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Laura Shin

Laura Shin

Contributing Editor

Laura Shin has been published in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal and The Los Angeles Times, and is currently a contributor at Forbes. Previously, she worked at Newsweek, the New York Times, Wall Street Journal and LearnVest. She holds degrees from Stanford University and Columbia University's Graduate School of Journalism.

Follow her on Twitter.

Laura Shin

Laura Shin

In the unlikely event that Laura has a professional or financial relationship with a company she writes about, it will be prominently disclosed.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
5
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Retracting former predictions isn't popular.
Of course the media being generally scientifically illiterate rarely understands the implications of the turns and reversals in scientific opinions, predictions and directions - even major ones. One of the most - if not the most critical and significant this year was by the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) and the National Research Council (NRC) which it funds. For the past decade there has been a strong push to sell algae biofuels (actually researched for the past 80 years) as a replacement for fossil fuels along with billions of dollars of gov. grants supporting the efforts.

What was missed by all the single minded would be biofuel developers, most scientist, and our scientifically illiterate government leadership was the simple 1st step in any energy source evaluation - a mass balance analysis and life cycle analysis - all of which has consistently shown (at least four such studies over the past two years) that algae biofuels and terrestrial biofuels all require NPK fertilizer to have any significant impact volume wise on the global energy deficit left by the declining, finite and environmentally hazardous fossil fuel industry. They completely ignored the commonly known fact that NPK is itself is petroluem dependent in its component production. No one seemed to make the connection that 95% of global food production is also dependent on petroleum/NPK relationship and that an NPK dependent global biofuel industry (estimated to require 4X the NPK of the current global food production effort) would not only dramatically raise food prices, but could also put the ever expanding global human population at risk to serious food shortages - and the chaos that comes with them (remember the minor food price/availability riots of 2008?).

The announcement by the NAS/NRC that algae biofuels are a non-renewable and non-sustainable source for large scale energy production is a major departure from the majority of rhetoric and wishful thinking by gov. scientist and science advisors in recent years - and as well the it is the handwriting on the wall for those companies feeding off of gov. grants for biofuel development. When you consider the long term affect of developing biofuels without understanding their drain on the remaining petroleum resources and the affect on global food availability this was a major aversion of global catastrophe and which if it had happened - could have made all the 10 items above comparatively superfluous to our species at that point. http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/24/us-usa-biofuels-algae-idUSBRE89N1Q820121024
Posted by dduggerbiocepts
Updated - 28th Dec
0 Votes
+ -
Hurricane Sandy #1?- over extending the implications.
While there is no argument that Sandy was a coincidentally a "perfect storm" (3 weather systems interacting not in a good way) and the damage was extraordinary, before we all conclude (like most of the media) that this is an artifact and proof of catastrophic climate change we might consider the following:

1. The northeast area where Sandy came ashore is one of the oldest developed areas of the country with equally old buildings and built under older (if any) and less restrictive building codes - making the area unusually at risk to such a low frequency major storm complex and its extreme damage.
2. In spite of all the media pontifications and alarmist hand wringing regarding Sandy's relationship to climate change you might want to read this NOAA announcment: http://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/global-warming-and-hurricanes
Posted by dduggerbiocepts
28th Dec
0 Votes
+ -
Sandy
Here are Dr. Jeff Masters comments on Sandy from the Weather Underground:

Hurricane Sandy was truly astounding in its size and power. At its peak size, twenty hours before landfall, Sandy had tropical storm-force winds that covered an area nearly one-fifth the area of the contiguous United States. Sandy's area of ocean with twelve-foot seas peaked at 1.4 million square miles--nearly one-half the area of the contiguous United States, or 1% of Earth's total ocean area. Most incredibly, ten hours before landfall (9:30 am EDT October 29), the total energy of Sandy's winds of tropical storm-force and higher peaked at 329 terajoules--the highest value for any Atlantic hurricane since at least 1969, and equivalent to five Hiroshima-sized atomic bombs. At landfall, Sandy's tropical storm-force winds spanned 943 miles of the the U.S. coast. No hurricane on record has been larger. Sandy's huge size prompted high wind warnings to be posted from Chicago to Eastern Maine, and from Michigan's Upper Peninsula to Florida's Lake Okeechobee--an area home to 120 million people

http://www.wunderground.com/blog/JeffMasters/comment.html?entrynum=2316

You generally can't attribute any individual weather event like Sandy to climate change but all weather is affected by it. Without climate change Sandy may have been 5 or 10% less intense and the blocking high south of Greenland may not have been there to turn it to the west. But that's just educated speculation on my part.

The real evidence of climate change however comes from taking the data from Sandy and the data from all of the other weather events and analyzing it to discover how things are changing over time. But humans are wired to take note of the big exceptional events so many of the climate change acceptors will point to it as evidence as many on the denier side point to things like big snowstorms and the increase in sea ice around Antarctica and evidence against it. I think generally the more scientifically literate you are the less you fall for these things.
Posted by riverat1
Updated - 29th Dec
0 Votes
+ -
How the hell is obamacare a scientific thing of ANY type?
n/t
Posted by jonrosen
31st Dec
0 Votes
+ -
Agree.
I second. And I would have thought the Higgs is the number 1 event of the year. And what has Sandy got to do in venturing into the next science frontier / progress ?
Posted by bsarich
31st Dec
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!