Follow this blog:
RSS

Sailfish: the first real competitor to iPhone and Android?

By | December 4, 2012, 3:00 AM PST

Right now, it seems that iPhone and Android phones are the main kinds of mobile phones and will be forever.

After all, Microsoft has spent billions to develop and promote the Windows phone, but it’s not exactly selling like hotcakes (four million in the third quarter this year, as opposed to Apple’s 23 million and Android’s 123 million).

If Microsoft can’t break into this market with all its brand recognition and cash, then who can break in?

Well, it could be a Finnish startup consisting mostly of ex-Nokia employees, according to a feature in Quartz. The company, Jolla (pronounced Yah-la), produces a mobile platform called Sailfish. It will unveil its first phones running Sailfish in early 2013 and selling them by spring.

So, why does Quartz think the company has a chance to compete with iPhone and Android, which seem to have a lock on the market?

1. Sailfish’s functionality is innovative

While a Sailfish-powered phone looks like iPhone/Android phones, it can do something the others can’t: “The phone’s home screen can be filled with up to 9 concurrently running applications,” says Quartz.

Even more interesting is that you can do something with an application without even opening it. The application’s “cover” — the rectangle that represents it on the home screen — has buttons that allow you to control the app, so for instance, you can flip through contacts in your address book without actually opening it up, or forward a track on your music player without opening the app.

The Jolla team seems to have asked itself: What does the user want to accomplish, and what’s the smallest number of taps required to accomplish it?” Quartz says.

2. It’s going to enter the market through the back door

Great, so the phone is innovative. But how could a tiny startup get enough market infiltration against Apple and Android?

Well, Jolla doesn’t actually plan to compete with them in markets where they already dominate. It is instead doing its first big deal in China, where phone sales grow 80%-100% every year, and where there are enough first-time buyers of phones to give a newcomer a foot in the door.

To do so, it’s partnered with D.Phone, China’s largest mobile chain retailer, which has 2,100 stores throughout the country.

But wait, is being in stores really that big a deal? Well, yes, as Quartz reports:

In China, things work a little differently than they do in rich countries. Retailers like D.Phone, for example, wield outsize influence over the rest of the mobile device market. In the West, cell-phone carriers generally pay the handset-makers part of the cost of a phone in return for being the exclusive carrier for that particular device. In such a market, a new phone based on an OS that nobody has heard of doesn’t stand a chance because the carriers won’t take a gamble on it; they might not recoup their outlay. In China, however, the retailers buy handsets and charge customers full price for them. The way carriers compete for exclusivity is to offer retailers and their customers the biggest possible amount of free airtime.

3. It already has an answer to one potential pitfall

People sometimes choose phones not because of the phone itself but because of the apps that are available on it, and developers make apps for operating systems with lots of users. And that is one downfall of Sailfish — it has a chicken and egg problem: no apps to attract consumers, no users to attract developers.

But Jolla has thought of that as well, and is making the Sailfish operating system open source. This means that handset makers, software companies, and mobile carriers can all make suggestions or even alter the code themselves to make it more lucrative for them. Quartz explains:

“So, for example, if a company like Samsung offers an Android handset, it has to obey by rules laid down by Google so that it can include the Android app store, called Google Play, on its devices. It can’t use another app store. Revenue from Google Play goes to Google, not Samsung. By contrast, if a carrier wants to include, for example, its own app store or music service in Sailfish, that’s no problem.”

This also means that Jolla offers a sweetener to carriers. Because its interface is so different and the OS was written specifically to avoid infringing existing patents, it could be free of the de-facto licensing fees that usually come with using Android on a phone.

4. It should be able to steer clear of the patent wars

The final reason that Jolla has a chance in this seemingly closed market is that it has created an operating system specifically designed to not infringe on existing patents. That saves it not only from costly lawsuits, but also from having to pay licensing fees for using another company’s patented technology.

For all these reasons, Quartz concludes that Jolla’s Sailfish phones could become the Red Bull to iPhone and Android’s Coke and Pepsi. Only time will tell if that will come to pass.

Related on SmartPlanet:

via: Quartz

photo: screenshot

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Laura Shin

About Laura Shin

Laura Shin is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Laura Shin

Laura Shin

Contributing Editor

Laura Shin has written for The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Los Angeles Times, Audubon and SolveClimate.com. She is currently a senior editor at LearnVest.com. Previously, she worked at Newsweek, the New York Times and Wall Street Journal. She holds degrees from Stanford University and Columbia University's Graduate School of Journalism.

Follow her on Twitter.

Laura Shin

Laura Shin

In the unlikely event that Laura has a professional or financial relationship with a company she writes about, it will be prominently disclosed.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
5
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Patent Law Area
"All progress takes place in the outlaw area" R. Buckminster Fuller

I guess Fuller would approve, but why not just use LINUX instead?

Is Linus Torvalds patenting anything?
Posted by bill1514@...
4th Dec
-1 Votes
+ -
The OS/UI sounds pretty much like what Windows Phone does:
"The phones home screen can be filled with up to 9 concurrently running applications,"

Concurrently running apps is not new on a smartphone, and Android and iOS and Windows Phone 7/8 have had that for a while.

So, when it comes to avoiding the patent wars, perhaps not, since, if Sailfish does take off in any significant way, the other smartphone OS providers will likely find some patent that was violated.
Posted by adornoe
4th Dec
0 Votes
+ -
More competition... A good thing.
Apple seems to have the patents on gestures... And it looks an awfull lot like just another iPhone wannabe (exactly what Roid is and as Roid so plainly demonstrates, open source also means open to malware and hackers, and that is not a good thing)... On the other hand, I haven't seen everything Sailfish offers and if they do indeed bring new innovation to the table. If they do, then they are welcome as innovation benefits us all. And god knows that Roid and Windows Teletubby Phone didn't bring anything innovative to the table.
Posted by i8thecat4
4th Dec
0 Votes
+ -
The iPhone is getting old and stale and not much in innovation lately,
and, Android has started the trend towards an iPhone-free-world, and Windows Phones will be taking away some or a lot of that market from Apple soon.

Time to get fanatical about something other than iPhones or Apple.
Posted by adornoe
4th Dec
0 Votes
+ -
No reason it can beat Android
The reasons listed in this article are ridiculous.
"1. Sailfishs functionality is innovative"
I don't see innovation here. It looks like their "covers" are somewhere between Live Tiles (WP7 & WP8) and widgets (Android). They don't offer anything widgets don't. Also, all of the sliding seems like a pain. I'll take a home button over the slide in from the right across the entire screen.

"2. Its going to enter the market through the back door"
I'm really not sure how well this will work. It may be a valid point. Even so, I can't honestly see this phone becoming big in America or Europe. Our tastes are not defined by the tastes of China. Even if it does get big there (if it is in the same price range as Android/iOS, it won't), it won't spread to first world countries.

"3. It already has an answer to one potential pitfall"
You describe a pitfall (the lack of apps) and claim the solution is being open source. These two attributes are unrelated. Their policies will be attractive to manufacturers and carriers, but they won't remedy the lack of apps. If I were a manufacturer, I'd pay Microsoft for their patents (assuming they are valid) over android long before I'd use this unproven, ugly OS.

"4. It should be able to steer clear of the patent wars"
The way the patent system is set up, you can never be sure you are clear of patent wars. If this device starts gaining any ground (which it won't), someone will come up with something. Have you not been reading the news about the patent wars? Everything is patented.
Posted by Patrick Aupperle
Updated - 10th Dec
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!