Follow this blog:
RSS

Revealed: China has another secret stealth fighter

By | September 18, 2012, 4:30 AM PDT

Another day, another top secret Chinese stealth fighter.

It was just at the beginning of last year that the world learned of China’s efforts to deliver a stealth fighter capable of challenging the world’s elite air squadrons. Since then, photos of the mysterious J-20 have emerged periodically, each time revealing an aircraft that seems to be making rapid progress and raising suspicion that someone has been privy to classified technology. Now, it appears that a second stealth aircraft has emerged as a potential alternative to “Mighty Dragon.” And there’s even suspicion that there’s also a third warplane in the mix.

Whereas the J-20 is being developed by Chengdu, the new J-31 is engineered by rival firm Shenyang. A photo posted over the weekend on the China Defense Blog shows a worker sitting inside the stealth-shaped plane that appears strikingly similar to the the J-20. Like it’s competitor, the new jet features dual engines and the sharp, angular form factor reminiscent of the F-22 Raptor.

The fact that China is having various firms working on a viable design isn’t surprising. The F-22 and F-35 were the result of an open competition that pitted major aerospace firms Northrop, Boeing and Lockheed against one another. In the end, Lockheed won out both times, earning the right to turn their prototypes into combat-ready weapons. David Axe of Wired’s Danger Room blog remarked that China may be taking an approach similar to how the U.S. military built up their current stealth fleet.

He writes:

It’s unclear whether Beijing intends to compete the J-20 against the J-21 for a single acquisition program. It’s equally possible both jets are meant for production. It’s also conceivable that neither is — that they’re both strictly test vehicles. “Feng,” an analyst writing for Information Dissemination, believes Beijing can only afford to manufacture one of the new planes and will be forced to choose. But that’s conjecture. As with any Chinese weapons initiative, among outsiders there are more questions than answers.

However China is going about it, they have yet to prove that they can take R&D from simply stealthy-looking to something actually capable of radar-evading maneuverability. Most of the design, engineering and testing is being carried out in secret, with little details beyond snapshots that get leaked on the internet every now and then. The best example of how covert this whole stealth business is is this strange photo taken in June of a suspiciously disguised jet being delivered to a Shenyang hanger.

Is this the J-31? Or another fighter that the Chinese military is also trying to keep under the world’s radar?

More stealth weapons coverage on SmartPlanet:

The latest military weapons:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Tuan Nguyen

About Tuan Nguyen

Tuan C. Nguyen was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2011 to 2013.

Tuan Nguyen

Tuan Nguyen

Contributing Editor

Tuan C. Nguyen is a freelance science journalist based in New York City. He has written for the U.S. News and World Report, Fox News, MSNBC, ABC News, AOL, Yahoo! News and LiveScience. Formerly, he was reporter and producer for the technology section of ABCNews.com. He holds degrees from the University of California Los Angeles and the City University of New York's Graduate School of Journalism.

Follow him on Twitter.

Tuan Nguyen

Tuan Nguyen

Tuan C. Nguyen does not hold any investments in the technology companies he covers.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
11
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
It's hardly a surprise that it looks just like an F-22...
...because it probably is. An unknown amount of data on the F-22 and F-35 has been hacked from Lockheed-Martin's networks over the years, either by the Chinese or by those who have sold the data to the Chinese.

The real question is if they can actually mass produce and deploy these planes for less than the trillion dollars it's going to cost us to do so.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
18th Sep
0 Votes
+ -
Did you even think about that question???
"The real question is if they can actually mass produce and deploy these planes for less than the trillion dollars it's going to cost us to do so."

Wow... Serious failure to think about that one John...

China... Where you can go buy a knock off of anything cheaper than anywhere else in the world. Where the people have no respect or honor and steal any and all ideas and IP they can get their greedy little mitts on... Yes, they can produce them for far less than the trillion dollars it will cost us... Far less than a Billion I would say... Far less...

The real questions are "what are they going to do with them?" and "how many are they going to make?". Is that another cold war I see on the horizon?
Posted by i8thecat4
18th Sep
+2 Votes
+ -
No, it is a serious question.
We know that China can knock of things cheaply. But is the end product worth the effort? I present their disastrous high speed rail fail as a prime example; done on the cheap and choc full of corruption. They were also incapable of integrating technologies copied from established manufactures. The end product is practically useless as designed.

These fighters operate on the bleeding edge of technology; there is little room for cheapness here. Your iPod fails, you toss it and buy a new one. A fighter that is unreliable and unable to function on a moments notice is useless. During the cold war, the Chinese were able to get by with cheap Soviet copies, making up for the low quality by building them in vast numbers. (thus making them disposable) That strategy will not work with this level of technology.

If they build these like they did their HSR, we don't have so much to worry about.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
Updated - 18th Sep
0 Votes
+ -
Jealousy has blinded you people eyes. Say no to bias.
Whatever you saying, dude. We'll see who will be the final winner to dominate the world. Big mouth on fantasy is a problem, but to succeed them is another matter in reality. Try your best to demonize and bad-mouthing China as long as you majority jealousy (blindly hatred to Chinese) Americans still have chances.
Posted by nikowilliz
3rd Oct
+1 Vote
+ -
stealth is the operative word?
The biggest source of our military development flow to China is, of course, the U.S.companies our taxes pay to develop the technology. Not content to make billions from the US taxpayer and feeling no loyalty to American security (only their pocket books) our military corporations sell it easily to the Chinese. Or as an earlier post suggested, the Chinese also steal it via hacking and theft.
Welcome to Godfull Capitalism triumphs over Godless Communism - or, Animal Farm 2012.
Cheers!
Posted by affordablecomputerguy@...
18th Sep
0 Votes
+ -
stealth is the operative word?
@affordablecomputerguy-Excellent! So much truth.
Posted by pete_evangelist@...
18th Sep
-1 Votes
+ -
Bench marking
China would obviously base their weapons development by bench marking relative to the best in existence. There is no point in developing something that is known to be inferior.

Do they have a motive to mass produce? I doubted, because the future of air combat/defense is remote controlled and programmable piloting of aircraft.

Is weapons development newsworthy? Not really, it just attracts readers.
Posted by Edwina Lee
18th Sep
0 Votes
+ -
I don't know about that...
China has a huge population and I don't think they would have any problems training a huge number of disposable pilots... Remote aircraft vs disposable pilots, the remotes have a clear advantage, but then again, it all depends on who is flying them... This top secret Chinese stealth fighters is more than likely a prototype. For all we know the production model could be remote controlled.
Posted by i8thecat4
18th Sep
0 Votes
+ -
Not likely
Pilotless planes don't need a cockpit, can be much slimmer. The design would be completely different, they would start from scratch as a remote-controlled aircraft if that's what they were going for.

A pilotless plane can fly circles around one that's hampered by carrying a human pilot, no matter who's flying it.
Posted by Greenknight_z
19th Sep
0 Votes
+ -
But I know
Mass production of weapons means that they will be manufactured much like car production, perhaps much of that production would also be produced by robots. So mass production speed would be virtually proportional to the amount of mass production machines used.

Why train pilots and burn up expensive irreplaceable oil & coal?
It is senseless.

Well, war is senseless. It is insanity.
Posted by Edwina Lee
18th Sep
0 Votes
+ -
Real machine
The configuration is different from the F-22, but it will probably fly more instead of do squat, suck in trillions, and peel like the F-22.
Posted by WINSTON982
Updated - 19th Sep
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!