Follow this blog:
RSS

Nuclear heat is on in Norway

By | December 21, 2012, 4:32 AM PST

Good on paper. The Halden test reactor (above) provides steam to Norske Skog's neighboring paper mill.

Nuclear reactors generate electricity. Everyone knows that. The general idea is simple: Start a chain reaction that creates a lot of heat and capture the heat to drive a turbine and make electricity, just as with coal- and gas-fired power plants,

But aren’t there other uses for heat? Don’t industries like steel, cement, petrochemicals, oil and many others require high temperature processes that manufacturers feed with C02-spewing fossil fuels? Wouldn’t it make sense to use small reactors instead, and thereby shrivel the leviathan carbon footprint left by those mighty mills that are stamping out goods and materials without which modern society cannot live?

Yes it would. And one country - Norway - is showing the way.

Its small test reactor in the town of Halden is furnishing steam to a nearby paper mill, according to the “Material Testing Reactors” website published by France’s Energy and Alternative Energies Commission (CEA).  Wikipedia identifies the user as the Saugbrugs paper mill, operated by Norske Skog Corp.

Halden by night. That's not a nuclear glow. Just the lit up fortress.

The Halden test reactor is jointly operated by the 34-nation Paris-based Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Countries like France and others use it to investigate new nuclear possibilities (it is the site of  thorium trials set to start next month in which privately held Thor Energy will run thorium as a potentially superior replacement for uranium fuel).

Those countries will be keeping an eye on the steamy business at the paper mill, which is potentially just a warm-up act, so to speak, to much higher temperature processes that alternative nuclear designs could provide.

The Halden reactor is essentially a small, conventional reactor that runs at about 240 degrees C - hot enough for steam, but not toasty enough for searing industrial processes, the World Nuclear Association explains.

But alternative designs like liquid molten salt reactors and pebble bed reactors operate at significantly higher temperatures, in some cases, around 700 degrees C. One design that uses lead bismuth as a coolant (coolants such as water in conventional reactors absorb heat from reactions and transfer that heat to the turbine) can exceed well over 1,000 degrees C.

Build these in compact versions that can easily fit into factories, and you’re looking at a carbon light industrial future. Halden is taking one small step in that direction.

Photos: Reactor from Institute for Energy Technology (IFE) via Wikimedia. Halden at night from Bård Halvorsen First, via Wikimedia.

More hot and alternative nuclear, on SmartPlanet:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Mark Halper

About Mark Halper

Mark Halper is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Contributing Editor

Mark Halper has written for TIME, Fortune, Financial Times, the UK's Independent on Sunday, Forbes, New York Times, Wired, Variety and The Guardian. He is based in Bristol, U.K.

Follow him on Twitter.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Mark has no financial holdings in the companies he writes about. He occasionally travels at the expense of companies or their press relations agencies in order to report on a company or industry event related to it; Mark will prominently disclose this information when appropriate. This relationship will have no influence on his coverage. Companies he covers do not get to review columns in advance, or select or reject topics.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
1
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
Norway and nuclear power
High time somebody in Europe besides France (which has faltered after its EDF was bullied into privatization) saw that nuclear is the only clean fuel big enough to put fossil carbon out of existence. How many people know that it isn't a fossil fuel, unless you count gold as a fossil reserve too? The uranium and thorium are most of what's kept the Earth's core molten for 4,500 million years.
If wind had any prospects, we'd be building sail-powered merchant ships. The US Navy's capital ships save millions of gallons of oil, probably billions, by using highly enriched uranium. And that's a primitive use. The liquid fueled thorium reactor uses a non-fissile main fuels, and a starter arrangement for the first charge of fissile material (surplus plutonium from retired nuclear bombs could be used), and from thene on converts the thorium to fissile uranium and consumes it. There is no long-lived waste, and the fission product waste works out at about a ton for the amount of energy that requires about two million tons of coal. The input consumed is, of course, about a ton of thorium.
Posted by SmartAlbert
23rd Dec
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!