Follow this blog:
RSS

Navy gets another hypersonic railgun, fires test shots

By | October 22, 2012, 4:40 AM PDT

The U.S. Navy has moved one step closer to attaining a devastating battleship-ready weapon. In February, naval researchers finally began testing a railgun prototype. Now, we’ve learned that they have a second test gun to blast targets with.

But whereas the first prototype was developed by military contractor BAE systems, this one comes courtesy of General Atomics, which recently announced a successful test firing shortly after the delivery of their “Advanced Containment Launcher” to the Naval Surface Warfare Center in Dahlgren, Virgina. Though Navy officials have yet to detail how the two competing systems differ, both have proved capable of sending projectiles a distance of 100+ nautical miles at speeds of up to 5,600 mph. That’s almost eight times farther and two times faster than conventional guns.

Electromagnetic Railguns achieve this by using electricity instead of traditional gun propellants such as explosive chemicals. Here’s a brief explanation of how the technology works:

You can basically think of an electric rail gun as a really big electrical circuit. It consists of a power source, two conducting rails running parallel to each other and, in between them, a piece of conductive metal known an armature that houses the round. To fire a round, a powerful electrical current at a magnitude of about a million amps is sent flowing through the positive conducting rail, through the armature and back towards the power source in a semi-circular motion to generate an electromagnetic field. The force generated by the electromagnetic field is what causes the round to launch at such high velocity.

The Navy chose to pursue development of the launcher system through the two industry teams—General Atomics and BAE Systems—as a way of reducing risk in the program and to foster innovation in next-generation shipboard weapons. “We’re evaluating and learning from both prototype designs, and we’ll be folding what we learn from the evaluations into the next phase of the program,” said EM Railgun program manager Roger Ellis.

Both General Atomics and BAE Systems have already started working on concept designs for a next-generation prototype EM Railgun with improved firing rates. Further advancements include upgrades to the automatic projectile loading systems and thermal management systems for the barrel.

Officials plan to evaluate the concept designs at the end of the year.

The latest military weapons:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Tuan Nguyen

About Tuan Nguyen

Tuan C. Nguyen was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2011 to 2013.

Tuan Nguyen

Tuan Nguyen

Contributing Editor

Tuan C. Nguyen is a freelance science journalist based in New York City. He has written for the U.S. News and World Report, Fox News, MSNBC, ABC News, AOL, Yahoo! News and LiveScience. Formerly, he was reporter and producer for the technology section of ABCNews.com. He holds degrees from the University of California Los Angeles and the City University of New York's Graduate School of Journalism.

Follow him on Twitter.

Tuan Nguyen

Tuan Nguyen

Tuan C. Nguyen does not hold any investments in the technology companies he covers.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
12
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
Rail Guns
I suppose the Russians and Chinese are all ready copying the designs...
Posted by james_lucier
22nd Oct
+2 Votes
+ -
Since the morons can't secure a laptop let alone a network.. .YES
I'm sure the Russians and Chinese are already placing bets on which war monger toy maker will win.
Posted by Reality Bites
23rd Jan
+1 Vote
+ -
Rail guns are cool.
But they have an inherent reliability problem that will keep them from being a primary weapon.

They cannot be fired when there is no power. One small EMP or a random hit that knocks out power and the ship is a sitting duck.

Even the heavy 5 inch turrets of the WW II era could be manually traversed, aimed and fired when power was out.

Rail guns have the potential to be a big hit long range weapon, but they will never replace the venerable 5 inch naval gun.
Posted by Hates Idiots
22nd Oct
-1 Votes
+ -
Aren't they like - -
a linear accelerator? Alternating magnetic fields "push-pull" the payload down the barrel, accelerating the full length of the barrel. This is what builds up the speed and kinetic energy.

But, as with everything, it has limitations. "Hates Idiots" is correct about the EMP. Not only would the railgun be out of commission, so would the ship's propulsion system. So they would need a "non-electric" back-up for the defense of the ship. The 3"-5" guns would be good for the "under 20 mile" threats.
Posted by JTF243@...
22nd Oct
-2 Votes
+ -
rail guns?
What is it with you people. Why the fascination with military stuff? Am I reading, Mechanics Illustrated or something? No one cares except for the negative economic consequences of defense spending on us poor taxpayers..
Posted by affordablecomputerguy@...
24th Oct
-1 Votes
+ -
Railgun limitations
All I have read, so far, indicates that all rail guns erode the rails at a ferocious rate. A few rounds and the rails become useless. So, where's the benefit except to the military contractors who eat money at an equally ferocious rate? A million amps makes for a very hot arc.
Posted by radiodog4@...
7th Dec
-2 Votes
+ -
More toys for the Pentagon psychopaths
Why couldn't the war mongers and child killers figure out how to deliver a MRE to a starving child?

Guess BAE and General Atomics only know how to make murder weapons and toys for psychopaths. The two war mongering cretins should be shut down, with no one making new psychopaths toys perhaps the psycho's would have to get by murdering fewer people.
Posted by Reality Bites
23rd Jan
-3 Votes
+ -
Hey Tuan Nguyen
What's with the obsession with weapons. And why are you printing PR pieces handed to you? What in the world does this subject have to do with Smartplanet?
Does it benefit your owner, IBM?
Posted by affordablecomputerguy@...
4th Feb
+3 Votes
+ -
I don't get some of you bozos...
This is technology that has implications into many areas of the future of our lives. Transportation technology, building technology, medical technology, etc. None of you bozos can see outside the box you are handed? Really?

From an inside the box perspective I see an very powerful and precise weapon... Not a weapon of mass destruction, a surgical precision weapon that can take out a tank or ship at 100 miles and much faster than any missile and with far fewer casulties. Does it cost a little money, yes it does, but like most military tech, it will find its way to the public sector and will most likely make our lives better... You know, like the internet you are currently connected to that started as an expensive US military project.

You all seem to be falling into 2 categories and perhaps the glass is half empty, or perhaps it's half full. This is smart planet, Yeah it's only a blog site, but this is a place for people who see the glass is always 100% full, 50% liquid, 50% air and if you can't see that then you don't belong. Go turn on Faux News or something and rot yer brain some more. John McGrew aka Hates Idiots and Adornoe definatly do not belong here.
Posted by i8thecat4
Updated - 7th Feb
0 Votes
+ -
Multiple Perspectives
I get what you are saying, and it definitely holds water that the military's technology can be adapted to suit public and civil needs, sometimes to amazing effects. It is awesome that this is all possible, but right now all we've got is a railgun.

Truth be told, there is a difference between being "outside the box" and "ignoring the box's existence". Sometimes the thing is obvious and there, and that's all it needs to be. Creative thinkers are awesome, but we need grounded thinkers too.

50% liquid, 50% Air, 100% Glass.
Posted by Dualgunner
22nd Apr
+1 Vote
+ -
Credibility
is reduced when one openly attacks people for having differing points of view (ad hominem), and worse yet when your spelling is poor (definatly is spelled definitely).

The make love not war message is not inherently bad - in fact it is inherently good - if perhaps a little naive. That said, smart planet (as far as I can tell) is about technology that can change our world.

On the positive side I can certainly see this technology being used to propel things into space, or from distant space to closer to earth (near earth asteroids to collection orbits).
Posted by dimonic
28th May
+1 Vote
+ -
arms race
the arms race won't end. even if this were to turn into a relatively peaceful planet with nations of good will trying to convince rather than coerce their neighbors into a trusting state of mind, the suspicious nature stitched into our bones since we lobbed rocks across the valley at one another would prevail. hence, we must harvest better rocks and get our hands on that new thing, the spear.
as for the argument that WWII hastened the perfection of penicillin, we'd have gotten there without the carnage. no, i don't think our participation in that war was unnecessary.
Posted by Sunon@...
1st Mar
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!