Follow this blog:
RSS

Meet the tonic for a clean energy future: Molten salts

By | January 30, 2013, 5:52 AM PST

Salting the highway. Molten salts can help produce hydrogen that would power cars such as this Mercedes Benz prototype.

So the world has an energy hangover from its centuries long binge on fossil fuels. Here’s the coming cure: molten salts.

These intriguing elixirs and their handy thermodynamic properties will soon stream and bathe their way into any number of power and industrial applications that will help the planet kick its addiction to hydrocarbons.

Want to produce hydrogen? Store solar energy? Remove CO2 from fossil fuels? Build a much safer and more effective nuclear reactor? Slash the carbon footprint of oil sand production?

Then try a molten salt.

HOT STUFF

As the name implies, these substances are salts that melt at a high temperature - hundreds of degrees C, depending on the particular salt. They’re stable, they’re good at absorbing heat, they don’t boil easily (convenient when you need a very hot liquid) and they flow like water.

Many of you will already know that molten salts could hold the key to turning solar electricity into a round-the-clock affair, rather than the intermittent “only when the sun shines” state that characterizes it today. A handful of “solar thermal” power plants - Gemasolar in Spain and Crescent Dunes in Nevada, for example - are or soon will start to warm up molten salts with special reflective mirrors in order to store heat that by night they can convert to steam and drive a generator.

Keeping the heat on. Mirrors reflect sunlight that warms molten salt in this Gemasolar plant in Spain. The salt releases heat to drive a turbine at night.

Regular readers of my blog will also know that alternative nuclear reactors that use molten salt fuel and coolants at high temperatures could trump today’s conventional reactors in many ways. They’d be safer, meltdown proof, would operate more efficiently, leave much less long-lived waste, and their waste would be less suitable for fashioning bombs. Use thorium instead of uranium in those reactors, as China is planning, and those advantages hold even truer.

Here’s another potential use, as I wrote recently on my blog for the Weinberg Foundation, a London-based non-profit group that advocates alternative forms of nuclear energy:

Molten salts can help extract hydrogen while at the same time removing CO2 from hydrocarbons like oil sands, according to Western Hydrogen Ltd., a Calgary-based company.

Deploying molten salt technology developed at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Idaho National Laboratory, Western Hydrogen thinks it can pull hydrogen out of “carbonaceous” materials such as the bitumen in the oil sands common in Canada, as well as from other petroleum residue and petroleum coke.

Their so-called molten salt catalyzed gasification process runs water and carbon compounds through a bed of high temperature (around 850 degrees C) molten salts, out of which comes hydrogen and “sequestration ready” carbon dioxide, Western Hydrogen’s website explains in a “low carbon” energy scenario.

The hydrogen could be used as transportation fuel in the elusive hydrogen economy, and it could also feed petrochemical production processes which today use hydrogen derived from more expensive and less environmentally friendly processes, Western Hydrogen claims.

Western Hydrogen also plans to use its process to yield carbon monoxide and deuterium (an isotope of hydrogen that, incidentally, is key to nuclear fusion plans) that it would combine into synthetic liquid fuels.

CANADIAN KICK-OFF

The company hopes to start operating a pilot plant during the first half of this year near Fort Saskatchewan, Alberta in partnership with Aux Sable, a Canadian company that processes “offgases” from oil sands and would thus provide Western Hydrogen with a feedstock of presumably bitumen. The plant is being fabricated by Burlington, Ontario-based Zeton.

Western Hydrogen, which says it funded the DOE project and has exclusive rights to the technology, hopes to establish a larger demonstration plant by late 2014 and to be “commercially ready” by 2015.  It appears to be targeting the oil sands industry as a main source of raw material.  Chairman Guy Turcotte and CEO Neil Camarta have extensive experience in the oil and oil sands industry.

The company also envisions a  “zero carbon” hydrogen production process in which it would feed algae and water into the molten salt bed and route the resulting CO2 back into an algae farm to help replenish the hydrogen production process. According to the company’s website, the process could also tap other biomass sources such as wood chips.

Western Hydrogen’s fondness for molten salts extends to other processes as well. In partnership with Salt Lake City based Ceramatec, it is developing a molten salt technique to “upgrade” bitumen into a pipeline-ready heavy fuel oil.

The methanol man. Jiang Mianheng, son of former Chinese leader Jiang Zemin, wants to use thorium molten salt reactors to produce hydrogen that would form methanol for cars. Jiang, who is head of the Shanghai branch of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, sees many other uses for the reactors, including coal gasification.

MOLTEN V. MOLTEN

Perhaps in competition with the Western Hydrogen-Ceramatec process, small, molten salt nuclear reactors (MSRs) could serve the same purpose of powering the separation of oil from the tar-like sands, as could other forms of alternative nuclear reactors. China is looking at using thorium MSRs to produce hydrogen and for various fossil fuel production processes, including coal gasification.

I know what some of you financial wizards might be thinking: What companies are developing molten salts, and can I invest?

I’m expecting to reveal the names of companies and researchers as they make business breakthroughs. I’m unable to say more at the moment. So for now, you’ll have to settle for the half-full glass of molten salt that you’ve just consumed. That was more than half, in fact. I’ll be serving fully topped drinks just as soon as some non-disclosure agreements allow.

So please come back to the bar soon - or follow me on Twitter for instant service. Feel free in the meantime to write in with the names of your favorite molten salty in the comments section below.

Cheers!

Photos: Mercedes-Benz hydrogen car from icedsoul photography, Teymur Madjderey via Flickr. Gemasolar tower from Toresol Energy. Jiang Mianheng from Mark Halper.

More salt for your energy diet, on SmartPlanet:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Mark Halper

About Mark Halper

Mark Halper is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Contributing Editor

Mark Halper has written for TIME, Fortune, Financial Times, the UK's Independent on Sunday, Forbes, New York Times, Wired, Variety and The Guardian. He is based in Bristol, U.K.

Follow him on Twitter.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Mark has no financial holdings in the companies he writes about. He occasionally travels at the expense of companies or their press relations agencies in order to report on a company or industry event related to it; Mark will prominently disclose this information when appropriate. This relationship will have no influence on his coverage. Companies he covers do not get to review columns in advance, or select or reject topics.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
8
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
-2 Votes
+ -
Can't we just leave the carbon etc. in the ground?
Is it possible to imagine a human future that can benefit sustainably from modern technologies that does not require dirty great holes in the ground. moving carbon from deep underground into the upper atmosphere, or leave countless generations to live with our irresponsible dalliances with fissile nuclear material. Molten salts are not benign substances. They require expensive anti-corrosive containment, an inordinate amount of energy to heat them up (hence good for energy storage if you can get past their high latent heat), and most are poisonous if not contained. I am definitely not sure about this. It was once said that nuclear power would be too cheap to meter.......how stupid were we?
Posted by mjxguerra
30th Jan
-1 Votes
+ -
Molten salts are very corrosive
While I hope molten salt technology can be made to work, it's been around since the '50s and not seen commercialization ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molten_salt_reactor ). I think it was either in the late '80s or early '90s when a test nuclear reactor in Idaho using molten salts was allowed to meltdown, and there was no radiation leakage or permanent damage. The problem with molten salts is that they are very corrosive, and you have to use a lot of energy keeping them molten.
Posted by zackers
30th Jan
+1 Vote
+ -
A history lesson
I think zackers is confusing two very different designs and, in the process, contributing to the false myths about both designs.

This is what two people who worked on the Molter Salt Reactor Experiment (MSRE) - see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molten-Salt_Reactor_Experiment - had to say.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ENH-jd6NhRc

It is possible that zackers was thinking of the EBR II? See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Experimental_Breeder_Reactor_II. This is what people who were there had to say about this design.
http://vimeo.com/35261457
The section on Passive Safety describes a test like the one described by zackers.

As my references indicate, there were no corrosion problems of the kind zackers suggests. The last phrase of his post suggests that he does not understand where the heat comes from which keeps the salts molten, that he does not understand how the MSR works.

In short, zackers, if you are going to express an opinion, please offer support for your opinion!
Posted by Vundla
30th Jan
0 Votes
+ -
Bombs from nuclear fuel?
The author is wrong to assert that standard spent fuel is attractive as bomb material. A very short time in a reactor makes standard nuclear fuel way too hot to handle outside of special facilities. The plutonium in the spent fuel is not of weapons grade, so a nuclear device is unlikely to be easy to make from the material. As a dirty bomb, it might succeed if not for the first problem.
Posted by JeremyBoak
30th Jan
-2 Votes
+ -
How will it save CO2?
What process will be used to make the salt molten? Will we be using fosil fuels to do it?
Posted by k8 br
30th Jan
+1 Vote
+ -
How will it save CO2?
Either you have not read the article or have not understood it.
The latter would require an IQ above 60.
Posted by kwickset@...
30th Jan
0 Votes
+ -
Save CO2, It Won't.
The proposed system for tar sands, or oil shale would not reduce CO2 emissions. The Author just assumes that the industry would 'sequester' the CO2. That means it would be injected into the ground at high pressure, to leak out later.

The Author also assumes that the corporations using this process will gladly accept the 20 to 30% loss of output required by the sequestration process.

Perhaps Canadian corporations are different than those in most other nations???

The author also assumes that the corpotations using the process will gladly accept the 20 to 30%
Posted by YetAnotherBob
10th Feb
0 Votes
+ -
salts
Well the Gemasolar and the Thorium MSR or LFTR projects are both interesting and both have been built as prototypes.

Gemasolar has detailed info on their website, so scaling the 12.5MW avg current plant up 80 fold and it becomes possible to build a an almost 24/365 load following 1GW avg power plant. The cost $26B, and spread over an area of 57 sq miles of 218,000 helio stats (147M sq m).

A LFTR would use more advanced FLIBE salts but probably 100s times less salt since all the heat is produced in a small volume the size of a house. If the reactor vessel covered 147 sq m, or 40ft across, it would be a million times smaller. That's energy density for you.
Posted by energy_guy
31st Jan
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!