Follow this blog:
RSS

Meet the companies looking to profit from climate change

By | March 7, 2013, 7:57 PM PST

For some investors, the time for spending huge sums of money to stop climate change has passed. It’s happening. Now, working under the assumption that significant change is inevitable, some firms are investing in businesses that stand to profit as the climate warms. Bloomberg Businessweek reports.

Companies such as Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs have purchased stakes in alternative energy projects including wind farms and tidal energy plants; they also set up carbon-trading desks. But now that efforts to curb greenhouse gas emissions in a major way have largely faltered, the appeal of investing in cleantech firms and carbon offset schemes has dimmed.

The costs of adapting to climate change may reach $130 billion a year by 2030 — bad news for many of us, but good news for investors who foresee opportunities. Here are some companies looking to capitalize on the planet’s warming trend.

Drought and abnormal weather can help spur business.

  • Water Asset Management buys water rights and makes investments in water treatment companies. “Not enough people are thinking long term of [water] as an asset that is worthy of ownership,” says Chief Operating Officer Marc Robert. The New York hedge fund has about $400 million under management.
  • Switzerland-based Land Commodities advises individuals and funds on purchases of Australian farmland, which could become more valuable as arable land becomes more scarce. According to the firm’s pitch, inland cropland Down Under is far from rising seas yet close to Asia’s hungry customers. The Switzerland-based company worked on more than $80 million in transactions last year.
  • New York-based investment firm KKR bought a 25 percent stake in Nephila Capital, an $8 billion Bermuda hedge fund that trades in weather derivatives. “More volatile weather creates more risk and more appetite to protect against that risk,” says Barney Schauble at Nephila Advisors.
  • Arcadis is a Dutch engineering firm that offers flood-protection services. Their revenue was up 26 percent last year to $3.25 billion thanks in part to superstorm Sandy. The company has contracts with New York’s Nassau County and New York City to bring water treatment facilities back online. Arcadis recently bought ETEP, a Brazilian water engineering and consulting firm.

With glaciers disappearing, there’s suddenly access to a lot of ground that no one has ever seen.

  • NunaMinerals, a mining company in Greenland, spent last summer prospecting for gold in the southern part of the island. Mining companies spent $91.5 million on mineral exploration in the Danish territory in 2010.
  • Additionally, Anglo-American and Danish mining startup Avannaa Resources have committed more than $15 million on a joint venture to explore for copper in the eastern part of Greenland.

Hotter temperatures and increased humidity are leading to outbreaks of the mosquito-borne disease dengue. There were 66 cases in the Florida Keys in 2011.

  • ‘Eco-entrepreneur’ Jason Drew is one of the investors who has bet about $30 million on Oxitec, a startup in England that has engineered a mosquito that can’t reproduce. When their transgenic mosquito mates with a wild female, their offspring don’t survive into adulthood.

[From Bloomberg Businessweek]

Image: J. Fang

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Janet Fang

About Janet Fang

Janet Fang is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Janet Fang

Janet Fang
Contributing Editor, Healthcare

Janet Fang has written for Nature, Discover and the Point Reyes Light. She is currently a lab technician at Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory. She holds degrees from the University of California, Berkeley and Columbia University. She is based in New York.

Follow her on Twitter.

Janet Fang

Janet Fang

Janet does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
6
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
-6
Planet Love
Posted by mememine69  |  Below your threshold
+3 Votes
+ -
Nice to know wealth is all that matters
Climate change is going to be a great profit making side of industry, sure many will loose their lives and its going to be a problem for a large part of the population but personally who cares as long as their is profit to be made.

There is a silver lining.

No I don't think global heating is going to go away or is fake and we can't really reverse or fix it all we can do is adapt to it and watch most of the large mammal world go extinct. Oh well that just how things role why feel down when profit is just waiting to happen.
Posted by Kiljoy616
8th Mar
+1 Vote
+ -
Profiteering only makes people question is more.
You hit on 2 key, and related, parts of the global warming mess.

First, everyone of its loudest proponents has a solution that will cost the average citizen of the planet big dollars and put much of that money in the proponents pockets. Case #1 Al Gore, but there are thousands of others like him.

Second, why do none of the proponents support adaptive technologies as you suggest? See first point. There is more money to be made trying to fix warming, not adapt to warming.
Posted by Hates Idiots
8th Mar
-1 Votes
+ -
Doing what comes naturally, just like the rest of the
fauna and flora.

Life of all forms, either adapted or perished, and the world continue in its merry ways, and none of the beasts of the past tried to stop the cooling or the warming, and many or most life forms continued to exist.

Using warming to create profitable enterprises, is adaptation the human way.

What would have happened 500 million years ago, or 300 million, or 60 million, if humans had been around and concerned themselves with saving the world and all animals and plants from the certain doom that comes with each ice age, or each warming period? Would we have been able to save the dinosaurs, and the mammoth, and the sabre-tooth tiger? Would we want to exist in a world populated with that type of life? Perhaps, but, everyday life would be so much more dangerous.

Adaptation is what humans are good at, and the human species has already gone through many warming and cooling periods, and we survived all of them, even while many perished. With current technology, we're a lot better equipped to handle and survive any kind of climate change, even the supposedly human created "global warming", which is all a fantasy. But, fantasy or not, we adapt a we go on, and we improve our lives while, (OMG!!!), profiting from the endeavors that we undertake to survive and make life easier under all conditions. Profit has been turned into a dirty word by liberals, while the truth of the matter is that, profit is what business is about, and wealth creation is what eliminates poverty.

Get over it, people!
Posted by adornoe
8th Mar
0 Votes
+ -
Evolution = Adaptation
All well said!
On a grand scale, the Cosmos is infinite and all things change and morph from one type of energy into another, which is exactly that - Evolution and Adaptation for all living species. No one can stop or prevent that from happening. Cataclysms come and go like a mega Space vacuum cleaner sucking and sweeping the dirt away and making space for a fresh start.

But the point at hand is that we as humans cherish life and always try to protect it in all its forms (perhaps because it is part of the balance of life). For the majority, its a natural gut feeling embedded into our minds.
For the purpose, we have created all sorts of organizations to helps us oversee and achieve that, primarily by means of science or technology. The balance in nature should be maintained as much as possible, even if some species do fade away to make space for new ones.
Yes it is not all doom and gloom as many portrait it to be, but if the situation is not closely monitored and (if necessary) corrected, it might well go all the way of the Dodo.

I also see nothing wrong with making profits in the process by exploiting the new opportunities the climate change is presenting. The fact which I am not entirely happy with (generally speaking) is when that is done blindly and without much consideration. The primary objective should be to preserve the planet by extracting the much needed energy from its "infinite" re-sources and rationally utilizing its "finite" ones untill we find abundand new sources for the latter.

With the risk of sounding cynical or blatant I have to say that, as always, there is another side of the coin here too; no one would care about profits, or ponder about poverty, when all that is left on the planet are dry sands and dead oceans, and all because it was left in the hands of the investors who were blindly chasing (only) profits.
Posted by fo128
Updated - 12th Mar
0 Votes
+ -
2300 - 12 degrees warming - Humanity extinct
QED
Posted by yarraberb
8th Mar
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!