Follow this blog:
RSS

Listen to Chris Nelder discuss energy independence on NPR

By | November 15, 2012, 6:01 AM PST

SmartPlanet energy columnist Chris Nelder was recently interviewed by WHYY-FM (Philadelphia) reporter Susan Phillips for a segment for National Public Radio’s “StateImpact Pennsylvania” series.

The radio piece is a tight look at why the United States can’t kick its energy import habit — and a nice summary of the columns Nelder has been writing for us since he first joined SmartPlanet in October 2011.

An excerpt of Nelder’s comments on the radio segment:

Part of the reason why we’ve failed to reach energy independence for the last many many decades is because economic growth goes hand in hand with energy consumption. And our economy runs on fossil fuels. We need oil for transportation we need natural gas for things like fertilizer, and petrochemicals. And we need coal for things like steel.

You can listen to the entire thing — it’s about five minutes long — here.

Photo: U.S. president Barack Obama tours the DeSoto Next Generation Solar Energy Center with Lew Hey, chairman and CEO of FPL Group, left, and Greg Bove, FPL construction manager, in Arcadia, Fla., in Oct. 2009. (Chuck Kennedy/The White House)

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Andrew Nusca

About Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca is the editor of SmartPlanet.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca

Editor

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet and an associate editor for ZDNet. Previously, he worked at Money, Men's Vogue and Popular Mechanics magazines. He holds degrees from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and New York University. He based in New York but resides in Philadelphia.

Follow him on Twitter.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca
Andrew Nusca does not hold any investments in the companies he covers.
If you liked this, don't miss...
4
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Disagree with Chris Nelder on the reasons why we're not energy independent
Sure, he's correct on the wide variety of needs and the humongous needs that a robust economy demands.

But, the U.S. could have been energy independent many years ago. The only reason that we are not, is because of the many hurdles put in front of the energy sector by a massive number of regulations which prevents them from seeking and developing the huge number of energy sources available to the oil and coal and natural gas industry. Whatever is being developed now, is in spite of the attempts to handcuff the energy industry, and if government had its way, we could all be riding around in bicycles and waking to most places we need to get to.

When people focus on just one narrow aspect of the overall problems with our demands for energy, then, the most important questions won't be addressed.
Posted by adornoe
15th Nov
-1 Votes
+ -
Chris Nelder right and everyone else wrong?
So you're saying reports (actually two reports) like this, predicting Marcellus drilling for the next 50 years, are completely wrong?

http://online.wsj.com/article/AP535162a5b4d84e558ea4f85c52a0f4d5.html

Mr. Nelder has been pulling his hair out, yelling, turning his face beet red, etc. for the last 5 years as natural gas production has soared and made a mockery of the "peak energy" doomers (of which Nelder is one of the more prominent).

Nelder's views are so far off base not sure if he can even post on The Oil Drum anymore, much less have his voice heard in mainstream media. I'm surprised WHHY takes him seriously. 5 years from now, when the Marcellus production is far higher than it is today, this report will look pretty silly. But it will be an interesting addition to the Nelder-doomer-oeuvre.
Posted by James.McMurtry
15th Nov
+1 Vote
+ -
The USA has already a shortage of fresh water,
Wait till the shale gas mess starts showing his real face. When well casings start to collapse eaten by the same aggressive and toxic chemicals used to crack open the rocks. When Methane, the main ingredients in natural gas which is twenty times more potent as a greenhouse gas then CO2, is bubbling up everywhere. Lot of farmers have already today no water for their live stock or to irrigate. Thats the real problem behind Fracking.
Each fracking shot uses Millions of Litres of clean fresh water, which will be lost for ever or at least along time even in geological terms. Who can make drinking water out of oil or natural gas, you may get rich.
Go look at this from an old hand in Fracking: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSWmXpEkEPg&noredirect=1
Dont just listen to the biased and from the O&G Lobby paid off so called experts.
Posted by Sourdough12
15th Nov
-2 Votes
+ -
You are, hopefully, aware that, the envionmental movement is well-konwn for
exaggerating the "problems" with any kind of drilling or digging for our energy. Fracking is one of those things which is exaggerated in order to scare people in to demanding that government step in and prevent it.

Drilling for oil is another example where the environmentalists try to scare government officials and the citizens into action, but, what most people fail to realize is that, most of the damage from drilling is being caused in countries where the U.S. is powerless, like in the middle-east and in Venezuela and Algeria.

So, who to believe: the environmental movement, or the reality on the ground, which makes the environmental movement powerless, except in the U.S.?
Posted by adornoe
18th Nov
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!