Follow this blog:
RSS

Lights! Camera! Atoms! Sundance to debut pro-nuclear film

By | December 18, 2012, 5:18 AM PST

The show must go on. Supporters of "fast" reactors - a dormant design that's been around for a long time - say it's time to put them in the limelight.

The case for a new type of nuclear power will hit the silver screen next month when Pandora’s Promise debuts at Robert Redford’s Sundance Film Festival.

Director Robert Stone’s website says the documentary will feature former anti-nuclear scientists and activists who now believe that nuclear power is a key to a low-carbon energy future that can slow down global warming.

“The recent reactor meltdowns in Japan have ignited passionate worldwide debate about energy and the future of nuclear power,” the website notes. “Pandora’s Promise is a feature length documentary that explores how and why mankind’s most feared and controversial technological discovery is now passionately embraced by many of those who once led the charge against it.

“The film is anchored around the personal narratives of a growing number of leading and former anti-nuclear activists and pioneering scientists who, in the face of considerable controversy, are directly challenging the anti-nuclear orthodoxy that is a founding tenet of the mainstream environmental movement.”

Fast talk. Sir Richard Branson backs integral fast reactors. He wrote to President Obama to say so.

WASTE MAKES HASTE

Promotional material suggests that the film will advocate a shift away from today’s conventional reactors and towards “integral fast reactors” (IFRs) that can burn nuclear waste as fuel and thus eliminate the controversial need to store it.

“The atomic bomb, the specter of a global nuclear holocaust, and disasters like Fukushima have made nuclear energy synonymous with the the darkest nightmares of the modern world,” Sundance says on its website.

“But what if everyone has nuclear power wrong?” it asks. “What if people knew that there were reactors that are self-sustaining and fully controllable and ones that require no waste disposal? What if nuclear power is the only energy source that has the ability to stop climate change?”

TILL WE MEET AGAIN

Cast members include Charles Till, who led the development of an IFR known as the Experimental Breeder Reactor II (EBR II) at Argonne National Laboratory Idaho until Congress shut it down in 1994. His reactor was intended to burn waste and breed its own fuel. It was also designed to be meltdown proof, as reactions would simply stop in the event that the reactor’s coolant stopped flowing - unlike at Fukushima, where reactions continued after the cooling system failed.

Not everyone agrees that IFRs and other “fast” reactors are safe (fast reactors do not slow down neutrons the way today’s conventional reactors do). Congress halted EBR II funding in part because of safety concerns and also because it worried that the breeder would increase the potential for nuclear weapons proliferation, rather than reduce it.

But fast reactors are gaining support, including from entrepreneur Sir Richard Branson, who together with climate scientist James Hansen wrote to U.S. President Barack Obama earlier this year encouraging support for fast reactors.

Bill Gates’ TerraPower is developing a type of fast reactor. China and Russia are both pursuing fast reactor development. Nobuo Tanaka, the former head of the International Energy Agency, has suggested that fast reactors could play a significant role in Japan’s energy future.

The Sundance Film Festival runs in Park City, Utah from Jan. 17-27. Pandora’s Promise is set for general U.S. release in the summer of 2013.

Photos: Sundance marquee from Resorts West, Park City, Utah. Richard Branson from GooglePlus.

More nuclear reels on SmartPlanet:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Mark Halper

About Mark Halper

Mark Halper is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Contributing Editor

Mark Halper has written for TIME, Fortune, Financial Times, the UK's Independent on Sunday, Forbes, New York Times, Wired, Variety and The Guardian. He is based in Bristol, U.K.

Follow him on Twitter.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Mark has no financial holdings in the companies he writes about. He occasionally travels at the expense of companies or their press relations agencies in order to report on a company or industry event related to it; Mark will prominently disclose this information when appropriate. This relationship will have no influence on his coverage. Companies he covers do not get to review columns in advance, or select or reject topics.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
5
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
Looking forward to the discussions...
As well as looking forward to watching the film... And I am hoping it is a balanced realistic view on a technology that we have yet to realize in the real world.
Posted by i8thecat4
18th Dec
0 Votes
+ -
Well said.
With the mania of the Cold War nuclear weapons buildup behind us the world needs to be more focused on the promising technology that has been around for decades.

Much of that tech was discarded by nations because it did not provide the bomb making byproduct materials of less efficient designs.
Posted by Hates Idiots
26th Dec
0 Votes
+ -
Just to be clear
While I'm definitely looking forward to the film, I'd just like to mention a couple points where this article is inaccurate. It's not true that IFRs require no waste disposal. The salient point is that the waste from them will be inert and only radioactive for a few hundred years instead of hundreds of thousands. The volume of material is small so IFRs essentially solve the waste problem, which was always a matter of long-term radiotoxicity, not one of space.

Also, at Fukushima the reactions didn't continue after the cooling system failed. The control rods had been inserted and the reactors were scrammed, but since the cooling systems failed they were unable to keep the decay heat in the cores from melting the fuel.

The article also states: "Not everyone agrees that IFRs and other fast reactors are safe (fast reactors do not slow down neutrons the way today's conventional reactors do)." This seems to imply that because the neutrons aren't slowed down that fast reactors are somehow more dangerous than conventional reactors. That's simply not true, and EBR-II funding wasn't halted because of safety concerns. There was an argument made that IFRs would be prone to contribute to proliferation, but that wasn't true either, it was simply used as a political ploy. In fact, the type of fuel recycling that IFRs use is inherently proliferation resistant compared to the type of reprocessing used in France and elsewhere.

For those who might be interested, the full story of IFRs, including the politics involved, can be found in Prescription for the Planet. The book can be downloaded free right here: http://tinyurl.com/9992kma
Posted by Tom Blees
Updated - 18th Dec
+1 Vote
+ -
PANDORA'S PROMISE
I am very interested in Robert Stone's new film "Pandora's Promise" (I participated in it), but am even more interested in ensuring that promotional material about the film is accurate. This is not, but I expect the film will be.

The "fast reactor" was conceived by Enrico Fermi and his associates in the 1940's and it "was born of necessity". It recognized that there are two kinds (isotopes) of uranium, and the prevalent nuclear power concept, at that time, was based on employing the scarce uranium-235 which fissions but consists of less than 1% of natural uranium. The other kind is uranium-238 which does NOT fission but consists of more than 99% of natural uranium.

Fermi et al, concluded that nuclear power could not be successful as a long term energy source if only a very small fraction of the energy contained in uranium was utilized. This is still true today , even though it has been learned that much more uranium exists today than was thought to exist in the 1940's.

In the weapons program it was learned that when U-238 absorbs a neutron, plutonium is created. and it FISSIONS. The Fermi concept is based on this fact; that U-238 could be used as a nuclear power fuel by first converting it to Pu-239.

The experimental program, involving both EBR-I and EBR-II, developed and demonstrated refinements of this concept (that fast neutrons were "better" than slow neutrons, that fuel recycle for this type of reactor was much less demanding,
that this type of reactor (as demonstrated in EBR-II) could accommodate very serious malfunctions without operator action or serious damage (perhaps this
produced the "safer" designation). Time will not permit the discussion of the many expansions and improvements that have been made to Fermi's basic concept, but the world knows.

Finally, Chuck Till did not lead " the development of an IFR known as the Experimental Breeder Reactor II (EBR-II)", he recognized the potential of Fermi's concept, gave it a new name and advanced it to the "commercial stage". He worked tirelessly to bring this technology to the world that needs it badly. I assume that Mr. Stone's movie will describe this very unfortunate period in U.S.
Energy History!

Leonard J. Koch , Laureate
Global Energy International Prize
Posted by LEONARD J KOCH.
Updated - 19th Dec
0 Votes
+ -
Idaho connection
I too look forward to seeing this film. Robert Stone and his crew visited the Idaho National Laboratory west of Idaho Falls to visit both Experimental Breeder Reactor-I and EBR-II to shoot segments for the video.INL employees are proud of the Idaho connection for the research.

Teri Ehresman
Idaho Falls
Posted by tlehre
8th Jan
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!