Follow this blog:
RSS

Just a partial nuclear restart would save Japan $20 billion

By | January 24, 2013, 6:02 AM PST

Nuclear nights. A return to nuclear power would help slash the costs of keeping the lights on in Japan. Above, Tokyo's Shinjuku district, with Mt. Fuji silhouetted in the background.

Japan’s post-Fukushima energy pendulum continued its slow swing back towards nuclear this week, as a leading government advisory group declared that the country could save $20 billion by restarting only half of its shut nuclear reactors.

“It is important to steadily restart those nuclear power stations that are shown to be safe by the Nuclear Regulation Authority,” the Institute of Energy Economics, Japan (IEEJ) said on its website, as reported by Bloomberg Businessweek.

Firing up half of the dormant 52 reactors would slash energy costs by 30 percent, or 8 trillion yen ($20.3 billion), by next year, claimed IEEJ, which is overseen by the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry.

Prior to the shut down, nuclear generated about 30 percent of Japan’s electricity. All but two of the country’s reactors remain closed following the tragic March, 2011 earthquake and tsunami that led to meltdowns at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear station.

Japan has filled the gap with financially and environmentally costly fossil fuels, including imported coal and liquefied natural gas. It paid 6 trillion yen ($67.7 billion) for imported LNG in a year, twice as much as in the previous 12 months, according to an official cited in the story.

One IEEJ associate, Nobuo Tanaka, warned recently that the country faces potential economic catastrophe if it does not return to nuclear.

Japan has also embarked on efficiency programs that have curtailed energy usage for a wide swathe of business and the public, who might be tiring of the measures. Although a poll showed 80 percent of Japanese opposing nuclear as recently as last March, the pubic overwhelmingly voted in a pro-nuclear government in early December.

The new prime minister, Shinzo Abe, is now pushing to reconsider the previous government’s intentions to permanently abandon nuclear by 2040. Reactors could start reopening this summer, after Japan’s nuclear regulator announces tighter safety standards.

The move toward a safer nuclear future also opens the door for research and development of alternative nuclear technologies like thorium fuel as well as molten salt, pebble bed and fast reactors, which between them offer a number of advantages over conventional solid fuel uranium reactors. Those benefits include improved efficiency, safer operation, the ability to use nuclear waste as fuel, and a reduction in long-lived nuclear waste.

Photo: Mrhayata via Wikimedia.

More nuclear reacting from Japan, on SmartPlanet:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Mark Halper

About Mark Halper

Mark Halper is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Contributing Editor

Mark Halper has written for TIME, Fortune, Financial Times, the UK's Independent on Sunday, Forbes, New York Times, Wired, Variety and The Guardian. He is based in Bristol, U.K.

Follow him on Twitter.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Mark has no financial holdings in the companies he writes about. He occasionally travels at the expense of companies or their press relations agencies in order to report on a company or industry event related to it; Mark will prominently disclose this information when appropriate. This relationship will have no influence on his coverage. Companies he covers do not get to review columns in advance, or select or reject topics.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
7
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
One man's saving is another man's cost
Japan's government has greatly benefited from the fossil fuel revenue bonanza. This conflict of interest, and the nuke-friendly result of the recent election, are reason to doubt the alleged antinuclearism of the Japanese public. It is likely the supposed polls on this point were wholly mendacious.
Posted by GRLCowan
24th Jan
+4 Votes
+ -
You can't wave a wand and replace all that capacity...
...bottom line the plants are there, and the reality that it would be a mistake to abandon them is kicking in. Nothing wrong with working towards alternative forms of energy/conservation, but as is the case for the rest of the world, nuclear provides a bridge to lower our dependence on fossil fuels and provide the baseload that we need.
Posted by Diveguy7317
24th Jan
+4 Votes
+ -
While under the Kyoto treaty...
...even with a stagnated economy, Japan's CO2 emissions increased by 7%. I haven't seen any estimates of how shutting down their nuclear capability has caused this figure to increase further, but since nuclear was roughly 1/3rd of their power, I'd imagine it's substantial.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
Updated - 24th Jan
-3 Votes
+ -
Smartplanet?
anything to do with nuclear is Dumbplanet. Where are you people getting your paychecks? Nuke stuff is dangerous, expensive, you can't get rid of it ever, et al.
Are you on the level with this type of article? SmartPlanet , with the emphasis on smart, remember?
Posted by affordablecomputerguy@...
24th Jan
+1 Vote
+ -
And replacing nuclear with coal is "smart"?
Because that is what is happening in Japan and Germany.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
25th Jan
0 Votes
+ -
In Japan it's gas
Not so much coal, as far as I'm aware. Gas is very lucrative for the central government.
Posted by GRLCowan
25th Jan
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!