Follow this blog:
RSS

How much money would you save by telecommuting?

By | September 21, 2012, 5:48 AM PDT

If you work from home you already know the benefits: a short commute (from your bed to your desk), relaxing working conditions, and interesting coworkers. But the money you save, or could save, by working from home might be the biggest benefit.

A new tool developed by Govloop and HP puts a specific monetary value on how much telecommuting saves. The site is intended for government employees looking to work a few days from home, but it can be used by anyone to see how much they save, or will save, by making the switch. The Telework Calculator assumes you drive and asks how many miles you drive to and from work, how long it takes you on average, your car type, and how many days you want to telecommute.

Let’s say you live in the city and it takes you 40 minutes to drive 10 miles (roundtrip) to work, on average. You drive a small car and just for fun let’s say you want to work at home everyday. According to the calculator, you would save an impressive $6,210.02 each year. Now, a substantial amount of that savings comes from the 174 hours of productivity saved each year (valued at $5,936.67). But you also would save an estimated $273.35 on your car and reduce your greenhouse gas emissions by 1,387 pounds per year.

The savings can benefit an employer as well. Christina Morrison, public sector marketing manager for HP, told NextGov that the cost to an employeer for a teleworker should be no more than $200 per month compared with $1,000 per month for an employee to work in an office space.

“By 2013, hopefully we’re going to see a change in more federal employees being able to telework because the infrastructure has been rolled out and put into place,” Morrison told NextGov. “If people start changing the telework conversation away from simply working from home to focusing on the business benefits, we’ll start to see more executives on the IT side and the management side opening up their minds a little more to this change.”

Try the calculator for yourself.

Photo: Flickr/Chiot’s Run

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Tyler Falk

About Tyler Falk

Tyler Falk is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Tyler Falk

Tyler Falk

Contributing Editor

Tyler Falk freelance journalist based in Washington, D.C. Previously, he was with Smart Growth America and Grist. He holds a degree from Goshen College.

Follow him on Twitter.

Tyler Falk

Tyler Falk

Tyler does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what he covers.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
6
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
oversight in the calculator
Interestingly enough, the calculator doesn't seem to compute the savings in gas, which far outweighs wear and tear on the car. What an amazing oversight.
Posted by davecohn@...
21st Sep
0 Votes
+ -
For people who buy their cars "new"...
...fuel is not the most expensive aspect of ownership; Depreciation is.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
21st Sep
0 Votes
+ -
cost of ownership
John,
I agree with you that depreciation is ultimately the most expensive aspect of ownership. However, in terms of cash out of your pocket on a daily or weekly basis, I would have to put gas costs ahead of depreciation.
Posted by davecohn@...
24th Sep
0 Votes
+ -
...which is the problem.
"cash out of your pocket" is the problem most people have with understanding the costs of things anymore. Gasoline is probably the only thing we buy anymore where we stand there and watch a display wiz past showing us what we're actually paying for something. If only a car displayed all of the other costs associated with it as you drove it, like depriciation, financing costs, etc.

We get upset about fuel prices because we actually see the counter spin up. And yet, that "cash out of pocket" is but a fraction of the ultimate cost of owning a car.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
24th Sep
0 Votes
+ -
The value of showing up for work
While I recognize and enjoy the benefits of staying one or two days max at home, I don't think the office is coming to its end tho'. In a world that gets more and more complex and fast paced, I think it is useful to go to the office, that is where the business breath, communication takes place and trust is built.
Teleworking is good for outsourcing work that may not be very relevant to the business, but the core? I don't thnk so.
Nothing replaces face to face communication. It's very hard to build trust via skype.
The watercooler is also useful.
Posted by aelena74
22nd Sep
0 Votes
+ -
home energy costs?
Are the costs of energy usage at home considered in the Telework Calculator? In other words, could one argue that the energy saved at the office is simply equivalent to energy used at the home office?
Posted by pmacb23
23rd Sep
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!