Follow this blog:
RSS

How Kansas City is making millions from human waste

By | December 31, 2012, 2:15 PM PST

After cities have cleaned out waste in water treatment plants, they’re left with clean water and something called sewer sludge that’s packed with human waste, toxins, and other impurities you wouldn’t want in your water. Kansas City treated it like other cities and burned it in incinerators. Until they realized its value.

Now the city uses the sludge as fertilizer on its 1,340 acres of city-owned corn and soybean fields. Don’t worry, the crops aren’t used for human (food) consumption. Instead, the city sells the crops to biofuel makers. It’s an endeavor that’s turned into a money maker for the city, The Kansas City Star reports:

The ingenious part of the equation is that Kansas City has made $2.1 million in net income over the past six years doing something that used to cost it money.

“That is fantastic,” said Tammy Zborel, who works with a sustainability program for the National League of Cities. “That is not a common practice for cities to engage in that level of farming.”

The city still uses the incinerator for some of the sewer sludge, but it’s only a fraction of the amount it uses on the fields. In 2011, 9,982 tons of sludge were used as fertilizer, while only 2,044 tons were incinerated. Impressive.

Kansas City-owned farm turns human waste into revenue [Kansas City Star]

[h/t Grist]

Photo: Flickr/pasa47

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Tyler Falk

About Tyler Falk

Tyler Falk is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Tyler Falk

Tyler Falk

Contributing Editor

Tyler Falk freelance journalist based in Washington, D.C. Previously, he was with Smart Growth America and Grist. He holds a degree from Goshen College.

Follow him on Twitter.

Tyler Falk

Tyler Falk

Tyler does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what he covers.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
9
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+3 Votes
+ -
This is news?
Milwaukee has been doing this for at least 50 years. The end product was even available to consumers, sold at retail as Milorganite. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milorganite and http://milorganite.com/ .

One of the interesting things we learned in using it is that tomato seeds can pass through the human intestinal tract undamaged and later germinate in your lawn or garden.
Posted by lmarks@...
2nd Jan
+3 Votes
+ -
DOA
This would be great if biofuels had proven to be a competitive and profitable energy source as an industry. The gov. has pretty much given up on biofuels for the foreseeable future and all of those billions of dollars of grants are over. (http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/24/us-usa-biofuels-algae-idUSBRE89N1Q820121024). Besides large scale biofuels lack of sustainability, the flood of cheap natural gas coming to the US market has pretty much been a double economic whammy ending large scale biofuel development as a significant energy source. Of course there are always pet food crops and golf courses to spread the sludge on.
Posted by dduggerbiocepts
2nd Jan
-1 Votes
+ -
Stop mucking about!
You know the old saying: where there's muck there's brass. Maybe they should call it
fartiliser. I wonder how they decided which sewage they would burn, and which would go on the land. Maybe they need a bit more land.
Posted by kitemanmusic
2nd Jan
0 Votes
+ -
Washington
Metro Washington DC has been processing sludge for many years into fertilizer.

We just saw a good example of that at midnight last evening.
Posted by dcr100@...
2nd Jan
+2 Votes
+ -
I am curious.
How they are preventing toxins like mercury in the sludge from getting into the corn and later into the bio fuel, as it has shown up in other corn products?

Bio fuel is already more polluting than most other fuels. Adding mercury to the toxic off gases is adding insult to injury for the stupidity of bio fuel.

http://naturalsociety.com/study-finds-high-fructose-corn-syrup-contains-mercury/
Posted by Hates Idiots
2nd Jan
+1 Vote
+ -
Learn!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Stv0NgX-jdc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKfjC5Hq0hU

The digestion is done at a very high temperature. This kills all bacteria that can cause harm to humans.

http://www.directindustry.com/prod/haase-energietechnik-ag-co-kg/biogas-plants-21720-55852.html -- I know Mr.Harry Haase the original inventor of this company. Today they use anything from food waste, to cow manure to make abundance of energy. In fact his own farm is producing so much energy that he ran a pipe line to his neighbor's home to supply free energy! They have installed vary large units all across Europe, African and other nations.

In Washington the sludge accumulated by giving subsidies to oil companies to the tune of 80 BILLION dollars a year for the past 50 years.

They have been making GOBER GAS (cow dung gas) in India for the past 50 years!
When the so called Third world countries (third in the world is the correct name) have learned the lesson and have changed their habits to utilize all the natural resources, we have people who want to "dig baby dig".
Posted by usdoc1
2nd Jan
0 Votes
+ -
Insightful
Thank you. Shame that few readers will take the time to click through your contributions
Posted by Zen Neophyte
3rd Jan
0 Votes
+ -
Bio gas in NH.
There is a family owned dairy farm in NH that installed a digesting system a few years ago to process their cow manure.

They make enough gas to power a turbine that powers the farm and feeds the modest excess to the local grid. The digested waste is spread as fertilizer on their hay and corn fields they use to feed the cows.

They save money on electricity and fertilizer they used to buy, they save on the fees they paid for proper disposal of the cow manure (per federal regulations) and they make a small profit on the power they sell to the grid.

The idea has created a lot of interest, but so far no one has replicated it.
Posted by Hates Idiots
7th Jan
0 Votes
+ -
Sustainability?
Does this eliminate the potential for those fields, in the future, to be used for consumable crops without extensive remediation? Seems very short sighted.
Posted by mbguzzetta
3rd Jan
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!