Follow this blog:
RSS

Hasta la vista, incandescent light bulbs!

By | February 1, 2013, 5:37 AM PST

These days, Arnie is muscling up on LEDs and other low carbon technologies.

Former muscle man, action movie star and California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger famously declared in the 1984 hit The Terminator, “I’ll be back.”

He certainly kept his promise, appearing fictitiously and real across cinemas, politics and public scrutiny as a cyborg, a wayward husband, a businessman, the Golden State’s top boss and in many other roles.

Arnie left political office in 2011, but now he’s back again. This week, he and his new non-profit, low carbon economy group - called R20 Regions of Climate Action - are joining with lighting giant Philips to promote regional and municipal LED lighting as a technology that can help slash the substantial carbon footprint of less efficient conventional light sources.

“Cities, states, and provinces are where the real action is when it comes to energy efficiency projects,” Schwarzenegger said in a press release. “We look forward to having Phillips join our building and street lighting efficiency campaign and help to make everyone an action hero in building sustainable communities and fighting climate change.”

At a Vienna R20 sustainability conference in Schwarzenegger’s birth country, R20 and Philips jointly announced an “LED Street Lighting Toolkit” to help regional and local governments quickly install LEDs  (light emitting diodes).

R20 is a coalition of public and private entities, backed by the United Nations. It works with “sub-national” governments to help implement low carbon energy sources and energy efficiency measures, with an aim of reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

LEDs require only about 20 percent of the electricity required to power a conventional incandescent light bulb conventionally used in homes. They are also more efficient than conventional mercury vapor and high pressure sodium street lights, and vendors rate them with a much higher life expectancy (only time will tell if they’re corrrect). And they are easier to control.

In commercial offices, however, LEDs have struggled to catch on because they are virtually no more efficient than less expensive - albeit shorter lived and more environmentally hazardous -  fluorescent lighting.

But if Arnie has his way, that will change. To borrow from another of his Terminator catch phrases, it will be hasta la vista, conventional lighting.

Photo: Dessertdarling.com

SmartPlanet has built a body of stories about LEDs. A few examples:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Mark Halper

About Mark Halper

Mark Halper is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Contributing Editor

Mark Halper has written for TIME, Fortune, Financial Times, the UK's Independent on Sunday, Forbes, New York Times, Wired, Variety and The Guardian. He is based in Bristol, U.K.

Follow him on Twitter.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Mark has no financial holdings in the companies he writes about. He occasionally travels at the expense of companies or their press relations agencies in order to report on a company or industry event related to it; Mark will prominently disclose this information when appropriate. This relationship will have no influence on his coverage. Companies he covers do not get to review columns in advance, or select or reject topics.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
8
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
LED
LEDs have a long way to go to be competitive. Price is still prohibitive and amount of light comparisons are low. In actual use, we have to use more LEDs to get the same illumination as what we had using incandescents and fluorescents.
Posted by ron@...
1st Feb
0 Votes
+ -
No extra bulbs needed
I don't see that ... today, you need only one LED bulb to replace one incandescent bulb that uses 8 to 10 tens more power. Obviously, you need more than one LED but that is not relevant.
For a descent LED bulb, there's no noticeable difference in illumination (I haven't heard anyone complain at least ...).
They are still vastly more expensive, but in my experience that is the only problem with LED bulbs in terms of using them.
Posted by AaronLenoir
1st Feb
+2 Votes
+ -
Not so hot
I'm using 150 watt long-life bulbs (130 watts at 120V) for HEAT. Not all sockets can take them, but in a small room they're quite useful. Might even be cheaper than central heat, considering that I'm only using one room at a time.
Posted by ka5s@...
1st Feb
0 Votes
+ -
Not always useful
Using the light bulb as a heater would only be efficient if you are in a dark place where it's cold. Obviously when it's light but cold or dark and warm, the bulb becomes either an inefficient heater (loses energy as light that you do not need) or an inefficient light (loses energy as heat that you do not want).
Posted by AaronLenoir
1st Feb
-1 Votes
+ -
No LED can replace this
Unlike CFL's, as of now there are no LED's that provide over a 100 watt equivalent.
For some reading, sewing, or other craft work, a 150 or higher wattage light is needed. I have a 250 watt clear glass worklight in a fixture above my bench grinder. I tried a 150 watt CFL but it took too long to warm up, was too "yellow", and too dim for safety.
Posted by JTF243@...
1st Feb
0 Votes
+ -
A lumens is a lumens is a lumens...
CFLs come in all different color ranges as do LEDs... Yes CFLs can take a few moments to warm up... You telling us that you don't posess enough forethought to turn a light on?

Grow up, quit yer whining and pouting and try to be a man.

This isn't rocket science... All you need are more lumens... Add more lights in the color of your choice dum8@ss. If you can't make it work then you are either too dum8 or are too butt-hurt to try... Perhaps you should give up manhood and go to beauty school or something.
Posted by i8thecat4
Updated - 5th Feb
-1 Votes
+ -
Always keep a good head and carry a lightbulb
Good article. Readers might also like to check out Slicer's thoughts in a similar vein - along with a suggested playlist to make up a Requiem for the Incandescent Bulb.
http://t-rinder.typepad.com/blog/2011/09/keep-a-good-head.html
Posted by TheSlicer
2nd Feb
-1 Votes
+ -
Arnold? For Efficiency? A True Lie!
Let's have a moment of Total Recall here, people. And follow the money. We can start with the fact that Arnold proudly owned six, no seven Hummers, and brought the vehicle to prominence, which came with a cushy funding of his non-profit by GM. http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0422-02.htm
He may have greened his image by converting them, but GE did no such thing, and they would never have been sold had it not been for him.

For those who don't know the backroom story of his meteoric political rise, he was tied to funding from Enron, whose deregulation power price gouging nearly bankrupted the state, and one of his first acts as governor was burying the $5 Billion lawsuit the state had filed against them.

What this means for Philips, we'll have to see.
Posted by Lumenator
2nd Feb
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!